• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

I agree, it all depends on who lets the nuke fly first.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

I don't see nukes, I see something more like a bombing campiane like GW I
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Nah, the most bloody war since WWII would have to be the second civil war here. We kill each other better than anyone(see stats for Civil War, Gang Banger wars, Murders per year, well, you get the idea)
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Anyone who sees war with Iran without China involved doesn't understand what's going on or why.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

With our government and media. PLEASE! We can't win the two wars we are in now b/c the media lets the enemy know where we are, how many of us there are, what were bringing, how were getting it there, when were getting there. Some things should not be privy to the public, especially before it even happens. All this is only worsened by sheeple who just don't get what war really is and a government that can't get it's head out of it's ass long enough to realize it's our true worst enemy.
We're losing these two wars and to even think of another one is lunacy. The terrorists have already won. Everyday we are reminded of the freedoms they took away. Our government will never give us these rights back. They want us to be controlled by our government and so does our government. I can't fish in the hot hole b/c it's too close to a nuke plant. If I fly I might be involuntarily ass scanned. Wake up people. You can't win a war when our fighters have their hands tied behind their backs. Either turn us loose or bring us home.


We are the only country in the history of man to fight for ground and turn right back around and give it back to the same asshats we just took it from. This makes no sense at all.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: EventHorizon</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Anyone who sees war with Iran without China involved doesn't understand what's going on or why. </div></div>

Sad but true.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Roger that....As far as we know China has near 5 million troupes.
Given how good war is for the economy (theirs or ours)I don't think we want to provoke that monster.

I think the battle would be like nothing ever seen before.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: nortex</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: EventHorizon</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Anyone who sees war with Iran without China involved doesn't understand what's going on or why. </div></div>Sad but true. </div></div>I'll bite: What's going on and why? Please let me in on the secret.

Scare-mongering makes good Copy for an article, but the 'nukes' won't fly. Nuclear powers do not fight each other directly; they never have.

Many military strategists are of the opinion that a US war with Iran, because they have no airpower capability and an almost non-existant capacity to threaten US carriers, would be short and brutal: That they would be wiped-out in short order as Iraq was (and in much the same way as Iraq was).

China has a lot of men in uniform, but they can't swim to California. The Chinese economy has limited wartime potential because they have not yet succeeded in either fielding an aircraft carrier or building a modern fighter plane that can be based on it.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

China is the recipient of most of the oil coming out of Iran. The Shehab missile that Iran has developed was sold to them by North Korea ie China evil brother. If Israel is stalled by the US and or Europe Iran will gain a bomb they already have enough material for one. The Iranians are waiting until they have enough material for at least 5 before they try to put them together. Iran has suicide boats and subs, and they are all enough to sink a US carrier. Iran has F15's granted older ones but still.
China does have a 5 million man standing army. China has launched 1 or 2 aircraft carriers this last year of their own design all be it with some Russian influence. China has just come out with their version of the F35 stealth fighter....The really big picture that most people do not wish to see or just don't is look at the population in China they have well over a Billion people in their country and counting. How do you get rid of excess population? Well most countries like Switzerland sent their young men off to be mercenaries due too not being able to feed the population. Egypt right next door to Israel is in the Same boat as China way too many people and not enough food,jobs and or excetera. Most in Israel know they can deal a decisive blow to Iran's program with out a problem. The real problem becomes its neighbors and or what will the Russians and Chinese do when a boat load of their scientists get killed in the attack. The chest master knows the last move before he makes his first move on the chest board.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

I agree with you Graham, except that China ordered 50 SU33's, the carrier based variant of the Su-27, about 4 or 5 years ago. They don't need to build them, they can buy them from Russia.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Finris</div><div class="ubbcode-body">China is the recipient of most of the oil coming out of Iran. The Shehab missile that Iran has developed was sold to them by North Korea ie China evil brother. If Israel is stalled by the US and or Europe Iran will gain a bomb they already have enough material for one. The Iranians are waiting until they have enough material for at least 5 before they try to put them together. Iran has suicide boats and subs, and they are all enough to sink a US carrier. Iran has F15's granted older ones but still. <span style="font-weight: bold">Iran has F14s, not F15s, and they don't have the parts to really keep them flying anyhow.</span>
China does have a 5 million man standing army. China has launched 1 or 2 aircraft carriers this last year of their own design all be it with some Russian influence. <span style="font-weight: bold">Nope. They launched a carrier that was once called the Varyag by the Soviet Navy. They never finished it and China bought it sans engines and navigation systems. It had to be towed to Dalian where it sat at drydock for about 7 years. It is in no way a Chinese design with Russian influence. It is a Russian boat with Chinese engines and navigation systems. It is also a LONG ways away from being able to launch and recover aircraft, let alone deploy with them into combat. Not to mention the tactics that have to be learned when using carriers (we have a bit of a headstart there)</span> China has just come out with their version of the F35 stealth fighter <span style="font-weight: bold">No again. They came out with a flying prototype of a stealth aircraft but they are a LONG ways away from being able to put it into production. The F22 protoypes first flew in 1990, they weren't produced for another 13 or so years</span>....The really big picture that most people do not wish to see or just don't is look at the population in China they have well over a Billion people in their country and counting. How do you get rid of excess population? Well most countries like Switzerland sent their young men off to be mercenaries due too not being able to feed the population. Egypt right next door to Israel is in the Same boat as China way too many people and not enough food,jobs and or excetera. Most in Israel know they can deal a decisive blow to Iran's program with out a problem. The real problem becomes its neighbors <span style="font-weight: bold">No one in the middle east (except maybe Syria) wants to see a powerful Iran, Israel's neighbors will look the other way if Israel strikes Iran's nuclear program. </span> and or what will the Russians and Chinese do when a boat load of their scientists get killed in the attack. <span style="font-weight: bold">not a damn thing because they could not admit to their scientists being there in the first place </span> The chest <span style="font-weight: bold">the game is called CHESS </span>master knows the last move before he makes his first move on the chest <span style="font-weight: bold">chess</span> board. </div></div>
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

China will not be "involved" just like we werent "involved" when we helped the mujahadeen kick the Russians out.

They will supply Iran with arms and everything but personal. We dont want war with China, and China doesnt want war with us, well not out in the open.

We might have won all the battles and maybe even these last two wars, but in the long run, the enemy has won. Not on the battlefield, but the freedoms we have lost since they attacked on that September morning in 2001. The taliban was able to push us to even more of a big brother style country. Just try flying, you get every inch of your body invaded, the Patriot act, now net neutrality, all on the guise of keeping us safe, well I honestly would rather be a little less safe and have all of our freedoms back.

If we do go to war with Iran, they need to keep the media at home, let the Generals run the war, get in, kill who needs to be killed and get us the fuck out. None of this 10years there bullshit. Let them fix their own country.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Finris</div><div class="ubbcode-body">China is the recipient of most of the oil coming out of Iran. The Shehab missile that Iran has developed was sold to them by North Korea ie China evil brother. If Israel is stalled by the US and or Europe Iran will gain a bomb they already have enough material for one. The Iranians are waiting until they have enough material for at least 5 before they try to put them together. Iran has suicide boats and subs, and they are all enough to sink a US carrier. <span style="color: #FFFF33">[/color]Iran has F15's granted older ones but still.[color:#FFFF00]</span>
China does have a 5 million man standing army. China has launched 1 or 2 aircraft carriers this last year of their own design all be it with some Russian influence. China has just come out with their version of the <span style="color: #FFFF00">[/color]F35 stealth fighter..[color:#FFFF00]</span>..The really big picture that most people do not wish to see or just don't is look at the population in China they have well over a Billion people in their country and counting. How do you get rid of excess population? Well most countries like Switzerland sent their young men off to be mercenaries due too not being able to feed the population. Egypt right next door to Israel is in the Same boat as China way too many people and not enough food,jobs and or excetera. Most in Israel know they can deal a decisive blow to Iran's program with out a problem. The real problem becomes its neighbors and or what will the Russians and Chinese do when a boat load of their scientists get killed in the attack. The chest master knows the last move before he makes his first move on the chest board. </div></div>


Wrong, they have F14s, and they don't ave the goodies to go with them.

Proof, on the F35. I saw a pic of somthing.

No matter how you cut it, China is a second rate military heavily influenced by Soviet doctrine. Good thing we have been studying it for 50 years. As for Iran, no way in hell are the going to get into a toe to toe conventional fight with the US, Desert Storm and OFI 1 has set te stage for no one in the near future going after us in that way. People watched us schwack the Iraqis twice in short order, they ain't stupid.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Alaskaman 11</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Finris</div><div class="ubbcode-body">China is the recipient of most of the oil coming out of Iran. The Shehab missile that Iran has developed was sold to them by North Korea ie China evil brother. If Israel is stalled by the US and or Europe Iran will gain a bomb they already have enough material for one. The Iranians are waiting until they have enough material for at least 5 before they try to put them together. Iran has suicide boats and subs, and they are all enough to sink a US carrier. <span style="color: #FFFF33">[/color]Iran has F15's granted older ones but still.[color:#FFFF00]</span>
China does have a 5 million man standing army. China has launched 1 or 2 aircraft carriers this last year of their own design all be it with some Russian influence. China has just come out with their version of the <span style="color: #FFFF00">[/color]F35 stealth fighter..[color:#FFFF00]</span>..The really big picture that most people do not wish to see or just don't is look at the population in China they have well over a Billion people in their country and counting. How do you get rid of excess population? Well most countries like Switzerland sent their young men off to be mercenaries due too not being able to feed the population. Egypt right next door to Israel is in the Same boat as China way too many people and not enough food,jobs and or excetera. Most in Israel know they can deal a decisive blow to Iran's program with out a problem. The real problem becomes its neighbors and or what will the Russians and Chinese do when a boat load of their scientists get killed in the attack. The chest master knows the last move before he makes his first move on the chest board. </div></div>


Wrong, they have F14s, and they don't ave the goodies to go with them.

Proof, on the F35. I saw a pic of somthing.

No matter how you cut it, China is a second rate military heavily influenced by Soviet doctrine. Good thing we have been studying it for 50 years. As for Iran, no way in hell are the going to get into a toe to toe conventional fight with the US, Desert Storm and OFI 1 has set te stage for no one in the near future going after us in that way. People watched us schwack the Iraqis twice in short order, they ain't stupid. </div></div>

China is able and willing to invade Taiwan while we are fully occupied with Iran and Afghanistan, as well as exercise what it thinks are it's "historical rights" to the whole South China Sea as far down as Indonesia. They even want the island chain thatincludes Okinawa, because like 200 years ago there were some Chinese there.
Whileour much reduced Pacific Fleet is occupied in the I.O., and the limited number of Marines in the Pacific are deployed to the Invasion of Iran, the Chinese will act.They very well may ally themselves with Pakistan against us.
China is raising hell because we are considering putting a Brigade of Marines in Bumfuck Australia,because they feel even that is in their Zone of Influence. The Phillipines bases are long gone, Oki and japan much reuced, so the best response we can produce a very limited number of Marines and Soldiers from Guam or Hawaii, and Oki.North Korea may very well take advantage of our preoccupation to invade South Korea.
Once China and North Korea are in Taiwan and the South there will be little we can do about it, except nukes and wailing.
Russia would love to see that, and will do everything possible to support Iran with sophisticated weapons and crews.

MADdoesn't work with Iran. They don't fear being vaporized, because the world wide conflict and death created will bring their 10 year old last Mahdi, who was murdered a thousand years ago,levitating out of a well in Qum to lead Shiite Islam to glorious and bloody victory against the Jews and Infidels. The Iranian leadership welcomes mass murder and nuclear conflict.

I doubt Iran could make a missile capable of launching a nuke at Israe. Most likely it would land in the Med, causing coastal flooding,or in the West Bank. That is if it isn't shot down by one of our Star Wars systems.
But they might be able to hit,or deliver by surface or aircraft, nukes against the Gulf States that we are using for bases.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Once the USA engages so do all the allies and they have carriers ,subs ,planes and men - china may have a zillion soldiers but ya gotta transport that sub fodder some how .If it gets that ugly there are Nukes with -France ,England , Israel ,USA and then there are the NATO allied forces even Japan - all allies if needed -Its not a force to be sneezed at -No one wants a nuke on their door step and China must think about its ability to trade with the western world -while it may hurt us more to start with it will crush them long term if we stop trading with them and the USA doesnt pay them a yellow dime .
I dont know shit but there are always many scenarios
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ch'e</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Once the USA engages so do all the allies and they have carriers ,subs ,planes and men - china may have a zillion soldiers but ya gotta transport that sub fodder some how .If it gets that ugly there are Nukes with -France ,England , Israel ,USA and then there are the NATO allied forces even Japan - all allies if needed -Its not a force to be sneezed at -No one wants a nuke on their door step and China must think about its ability to trade with the western world -while it may hurt us more to start with it will crush them long term if we stop trading with them and the USA doesnt pay them a yellow dime .
I dont know shit but there are always many scenarios
</div></div>
None of our "allies" have any effective force projection. France has a little, but they won't commit. England has no carrier or amphib. Neither does Japan. Neither does Isreal.Subs?who has some there? isreal has a couplein the Red Sea, with a few Tomahawks.
We will be doing this on our own.
Nobody else is able or willing to help Taiwan, or us. South Korea either.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body">[/quote]I'll bite: What's going on and why? Please let me in on the secret.

Scare-mongering makes good Copy for an article, but the 'nukes' won't fly. Nuclear powers do not fight each other directly; they never have.

Many military strategists are of the opinion that a US war with Iran, because they have no airpower capability and an almost non-existant capacity to threaten US carriers, would be short and brutal: That they would be wiped-out in short order as Iraq was (and in much the same way as Iraq was).

China has a lot of men in uniform, but they can't swim to California. The Chinese economy has limited wartime potential because they have not yet succeeded in either fielding an aircraft carrier or building a modern fighter plane that can be based on it. </div></div>

I agree that China would never try to conquer US soil, but neither would the USA be so foolish as to try the reverse.

That said I don't think the USA could eradicate enough of the ground forces to stop them in the middle east....Not before they got dug in to little towns everywhere...Then the planes become fairly useless....Unless you are willing to do what it takes and level the place. Historically we do poorly in that sort of fight.

Also, China has an insane anti-aircraft program so while they lack planes they will be shooting back like swarming locusts.
I think we lack the manpower, the physiological commitment, and the finances to fight them on the open battlefield. I think they have what we lack...In spades.

Not that we couldn't win, but I think we wont make the tough collateral decisions to get the job done...The media would sink our troupes before they got started.

Interesting discussion.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ch'e</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Here is a list of current ships from france and England -they both have carriers ,subs amphibious vessels

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_French_Navy_ships

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Royal_Navy_ships </div></div>
Big deal.England has scrapped all it's harriers so it's carriers, that had limited capablity anyway,have no planes. One carrier is worn out and needs refit desperately but England is broke. They have one LPH and two LPD.s So they can put 8 LCU's and 12 LCVP's on a beach,and some helos. That's if all their ships are servicable and don't have their engines torn apart for overhaul.
The French have one carrier, which carries 16 jets and a E2C.It's reactor leaks. It's propellors are defective. They have 3 LHD's and a LPD.So they can put 12 LCU's and 2 LCAC's on the beach,if all their notoriously unreliable ships are fit to sail.
America has 11 powerful Nuclear carriers and more amphib capability than the whole rest of the worldcombined, by far.
But it's not enough, and Russia, and China, and Iran know it.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

This is turning into an interesting discussion. Isn't our military going through budget cuts right now? Or parts of our military?
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

there are three countries left who do not have a rothschilds owned central bank. They are: Iran, N. Korea and Cuba. Watch the watchers....
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Fact of the matter is neither us or China wants to start that fight. Both sides already realize the outcome, and no one wins. Well, maybe some 3rd world countries will. Nukes!! Aren't we the country that drafted the whole "show your nuke program" after the cold war ended (or did it)....Oh, and by the way we never signed our own country up, we(NATO) just made everyone else. So, no one really knows how many nukes we have, and how many new silos have been built in the US (and probably now Iraq and Afghanistan). As far as technology goes, we get at least 40%-60% of our technological ideas from everyone else. Remember every country has their own R&D division regardless of how poor they are, and they don't let secret squirrel toys out. Don't think for a minute the US doesn't have some really cool war toys that no one has ever seen. UH, same goes for China. You don't have that many people in your military and not use them as lab rats. China or Russia probably has some of our old equipment we left in the frozen tundra of Alaska. Back in the 70's when our military was conducting training programs/exercises and air dropping heavy equipment out in the sticks. I think they forgot what happens when you drop 18 or more tons from 10-20K ft. on partially frozen soil during the thaw season. So, we left a lot of STUFF burried about 20-40 feet deep in Alaska. Wow, this is a fun thread.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mustafa</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Finris</div><div class="ubbcode-body">China is the recipient of most of the oil coming out of Iran. The Shehab missile that Iran has developed was sold to them by North Korea ie China evil brother. If Israel is stalled by the US and or Europe Iran will gain a bomb they already have enough material for one. The Iranians are waiting until they have enough material for at least 5 before they try to put them together. Iran has suicide boats and subs, and they are all enough to sink a US carrier. Iran has F15's granted older ones but still. <span style="font-weight: bold">Iran has F14s, not F15s, and they don't have the parts to really keep them flying anyhow.</span>
China does have a 5 million man standing army. China has launched 1 or 2 aircraft carriers this last year of their own design all be it with some Russian influence. <span style="font-weight: bold">Nope. They launched a carrier that was once called the Varyag by the Soviet Navy. They never finished it and China bought it sans engines and navigation systems. It had to be towed to Dalian where it sat at drydock for about 7 years. It is in no way a Chinese design with Russian influence. It is a Russian boat with Chinese engines and navigation systems. It is also a LONG ways away from being able to launch and recover aircraft, let alone deploy with them into combat. Not to mention the tactics that have to be learned when using carriers (we have a bit of a headstart there)</span> China has just come out with their version of the F35 stealth fighter <span style="font-weight: bold">No again. They came out with a flying prototype of a stealth aircraft but they are a LONG ways away from being able to put it into production. The F22 protoypes first flew in 1990, they weren't produced for another 13 or so years</span>....The really big picture that most people do not wish to see or just don't is look at the population in China they have well over a Billion people in their country and counting. How do you get rid of excess population? Well most countries like Switzerland sent their young men off to be mercenaries due too not being able to feed the population. Egypt right next door to Israel is in the Same boat as China way too many people and not enough food,jobs and or excetera. Most in Israel know they can deal a decisive blow to Iran's program with out a problem. The real problem becomes its neighbors <span style="font-weight: bold">No one in the middle east (except maybe Syria) wants to see a powerful Iran, Israel's neighbors will look the other way if Israel strikes Iran's nuclear program. </span> and or what will the Russians and Chinese do when a boat load of their scientists get killed in the attack. <span style="font-weight: bold">not a damn thing because they could not admit to their scientists being there in the first place </span> The chest <span style="font-weight: bold">the game is called CHESS </span>master knows the last move before he makes his first move on the chest <span style="font-weight: bold">chess</span> board. </div></div> </div></div>

I have alot to add here once I have the time as I spent a year working intel in the 5th and 7th Fleet AORs. IRAN is a threat and a war with them would be very different than it was with IRAQ, mainly due to the Straits of Hormuz and the 6 KILO class subs they have. They would surely be sunk in port right off the bat, but it would still be a different fight for sure. IRAN has the largest Navy in the gulf and lots of small craft(seen pics of a couple ragheads on a jet ski with a stinger)....As far a China goes, I know quite a bit about their capabilities as well.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Donttrytorun</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

China is able and willing to invade Taiwan while we are fully occupied with Iran and Afghanistan, as well as exercise what it thinks are it's "historical rights" to the whole South China Sea as far down as Indonesia. They even want the island chain thatincludes Okinawa, because like 200 years ago there were some Chinese there.
</div></div>

China wants to reunite with Taiwan peacefully. China doesn't want to destroy Taiwan. It would be more like when Hong Kong was given back to China. Also, I large portion of the Taiwanese/Chinese would like to become part of China.

The powers that be in Taiwan are now using the Native Taiwanese people to say that Taiwan was never part of China. The Native Taiwanese are considered Austronesian peoples and were in Taiwan 8,000 years before the first Chinese people. Also, historically the Chinese empires didn't have Navys, so they were unable to have influence or control over Taiwan.

Taiwan and China are starting to have better relations. This is needed if China wants to reunite with Taiwan. At one time not so long ago you could only fly direct between the two during Chinese New Year. Now they have direct flights daily between the two countries.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

What some of you are forgetting is that England, France, and the US still have the largest battle fleets still sitting in mothballs. Ships that can be refitted and recommissioned quickly. As for England not having any carrier planes is wrong. If memory serves England and France have jointly developed a fleet of carrier planes that are very capable. Of course I might be wrong, but pretty sure I read something about it awhile back. As for the russian navy, they are in shambles worse than nato and not to mention not very modern. As for their mothballed fleets, they don't have any reserves because they are broke also, and have been selling them to third world countries for years now. Also, Japan has been quietly rebuilding its navy, which is very sophisticated(sic?), as well as it's land forces. Their military may still be more a defensive force it still has the ability to strike offensively(sic?). As for South Korea, once their military has been completely moblized it outnumbers the north koreans by a large margin. As for the north koreans their new leader leans more toward the russian influence while some of the higher regime people favor the chinese, so their government is very unstable.
So in summary, the western powers and even nato can still field more ships and men than china, north korea, and iran. As for russia, remember it isn't the ussr any more and they don't have their eastern bloc allies anymore, who by the way would side with us in a fight against russia.
But this is just my opinion, and some of my facts could be slightly off, (getting old). So please try not to roast me too bad...:))
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

USA+UN= Disaster
USA in another war without leadership= disaster
Troops are tired of being political puppets. Even though we always have been, our noses seem to be rubbed in it more and more.
The only like minded country that has enough balls to engage in any offensive strike towards any country is Israel. We don't really back them enough anymore. They probably would be apprehensive in backing us up even if it was what they needed because they do not trust our government.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Mmmm... Popcorn...

<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nZMwKPmsbWE"></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nZMwKPmsbWE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mustafa</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I agree with you Graham, except that China ordered 50 SU33's, the carrier based variant of the Su-27, about 4 or 5 years ago. They don't need to build them, they can buy them from Russia. </div></div>True. Keep in mind, though, that China's first carrier (which is rumored to be in the planning stages) will probably be of a size which can carry no more than 15 aircraft. One has to go back 500 years to find any evidence of China venturing as far as East Asia with its navy, and even then it has no history of (meaning no experience with) attempting to extend its military power beyond its own coastal waters. As you know, both carriers it bought from Russia in the 1990s have been decommissioned and one has recently become an attraction at an amusement park. If the original plan was to use them, then it looks like they got the very short end of a long Russian stick. So I doubt we'll see Chinese carriers carrying SU33's any time soon.

Finris, an Iranian sub isn't getting anywhere near a US carrier. Especially due to the manner in which the carriers are deployed. During the first weeks of the 1991 war even the closest carriers - the three stationed in the Gulf - were in open water 300 miles from their targets and never more than 200 miles from shore.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

No quite true Graham. One carrier the Chinese bought was turned into an amusement park. Cover to buy the second one, which they said they were turning into a casino. The second carrier, once called teh Varyag, left harbor in August for sea trials. It is anything but decomissioned!

111214-chinese-carrier-sailing-1145a.photoblog900.jpg
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

But if we go to war with China, where am I gonna get my iPhone5 from.How am I going to surf Snipershide while driving?
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jericho</div><div class="ubbcode-body">But if we go to war with China, where am I gonna get my iPhone5 from.How am I going to surf Snipershide while driving?</div></div>

Switch to samsung...
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mustafa</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No quite true Graham. One carrier the Chinese bought was turned into an amusement park. Cover to buy the second one, which they said they were turning into a casino. The second carrier, once called teh Varyag, left harbor in August for sea trials. It is anything but decomissioned!</div></div>Ahhh... I see the 'ole rust bucket still floats.
grin.gif


I guess my info is a bit dated. No matter, though, because in that shape it will likely share the same fate as the Argentinian <span style="font-style: italic">Veinticinco de Mayo</span>: To be wisely withdrawn to port should hostilities ever break out.
wink.gif
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hi Speed</div><div class="ubbcode-body">USA+UN= Disaster
USA in another war without leadership= disaster
Troops are tired of being political puppets. Even though we always have been, our noses seem to be rubbed in it more and more.
The only like minded country that has enough balls to engage in any offensive strike towards any country is Israel. We don't really back them enough anymore. They probably would be apprehensive in backing us up even if it was what they needed because they do not trust our government. </div></div>

Roger that!
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mustafa</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No quite true Graham. One carrier the Chinese bought was turned into an amusement park. Cover to buy the second one, which they said they were turning into a casino. The second carrier, once called teh Varyag, left harbor in August for sea trials. It is anything but decomissioned!</div></div>Ahhh... I see the 'ole rust bucket still floats.
grin.gif


I guess my info is a bit dated. No matter, though, because in that shape it will likely share the same fate as the Argentinian <span style="font-style: italic">Veinticinco de Mayo</span>: To be wisely withdrawn to port should hostilities ever break out.
wink.gif
</div></div>
To be fair the technology gap between the 1940's Argentinian carrier and the 1960's subs and ships chasing her were much larger than the perceived gap between an Admiral Kuznetsov carrier like Ex Varyag. Depending on how the Chinese outfit her she will likely be more than a match for the Indian carrier group she is likely to face. China's first indigenous carrier will more likely be designed with a fight with the US in mind.
Having not had western eyes inside of her there's no telling what shape she is really in, but I doubt rustbucket. She's probably in better shape than Enterprise.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Grimm, good point.

But I'm not sure that it's about the technology gap (although that does play a part), it's about a gap in force protection support ability and the capacity to apply the necessary group tactics.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Grimm, good point.

But I'm not sure that it's about the technology gap (although that does play a part), it's about a gap in force protection support ability and the capacity to apply the necessary group tactics. </div></div>
I'm assuming you mean the Argies and not the Chinese. The PLAN has by my count from open sources 8 modern destroyers and 26 modern frigates. To form a carrier battle group under the US formula requires 2 multi role cruisers, 2 anti aircraft destroyers, and 2 anti submarine friagtes (or destroyers), and 2 SSNs...Really these days it's 2 cruisers, 3 destroyers, and 2 SSNs; but lets pretend the older carrier strike group model is what China will use. China's only real gap is in the multirole guided missile cruiser...a gap very shortly we will have as well, although the 4th flight of Arliegh Burkes will probably be used to cover both the destroyer and cruiser role, those ABs having everything that supposedly redesignated the Ticonderogas from DDGs to CGs. They rightly deserve the title Cruiser, just like Japans aircraft carrying destroyers are cruisers...like the Invincibles. but I digress.
IF and thats a large if the verticle launch systems on the newest Chinese destroyers are capable of providing true anti ship capabilities on par with the ABs, or China develops a true cruiser class they can put a US carrier group to sea as soon as Varyag has a carrier air wing. with 5 destroyers and 4 frigates and 2 SSNs of roughly equal technology to a US strike group.
The summary really is that soon China will have the ability to deploy a very modern carrier strike group, a raw green GSG that will need to learn to operate as a unit. But they have been practicing many of the needed skills, underway replenishment against the Somali pirates, carrier landings on that carrier on the lake they have, ship to ship blue water operations again in Somalia, I'm not a Navy guy but I'm sure there's more. The Chinese are smart they know they don't have a turn key CSG, but they are building towards the skills they need. In the non-to distant future the PLAN will become a legitimate force in at least the South China Sea. As they increase their modern destroyer and frigate force, and develop an indigenous carrier and the aviation industry to support next generation carrier borne aircraft they step into a future where China is no longer a 3rd rate navy but a legitimate fighting force to be reckoned with. They'll fight India first to test the waters, if they win it'll be on.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

The key there - navy to navy - probably resides in submarine capability. On that note, it is in the public domain that China has claimed they have had a sub within torpedo range of a US carrier. To my knowledge that claim was never confirmed.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

I believe they SURFACED a sub within torpedo range of a US carrier. As to how they did it, my guess is, look where the carrier is going. Get in front of it and sink to the bottom. Turn everything off. Surface when the carrier is in range. Viola!
Then again, what is to say that there wasn't an American SSN right behind the Chinese one when this happened. Might even be the reason they Chinese sub surfaced... "Hey Chinese sub! Surface or they will never find your bodies. Love, USN"
In international waters, there is nothing we can do to keep a Chinese sub from getting close to an American carrier unless it starts to TRUELY threaten the carrier.
Of course, when you combine that with a missile launch off the coast of CA, you can see that China is VERY concerned with making their submarine fleet at least LOOK very threatening.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

I was told they had purchased several newer diesel subs...
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Not purchased, Building. The Chinese stopped buying a lot of soviet and ex-soviet equipment after some sort of falling out. They still deal with manufacturers but a lot of indigenous industries produce copies licensed or not, home grown variants, and outright new systems. Diesel submarines are one of the successful sectors China won't outsource.

That Song class sub that surfaced near Kitty Hawk didn't really expose a weakness tue Navy didn't already know was there. The USN leased a Swedish sub for two years, in at least one exercise that sub was able to penetrate the formation around Ronald Reagan and simulate sinking her. The story was published about 3 months before the Chinese incident. The publicity of both incidents leads me to believe that the navy has a fix, isn't as vulnerable as they are leading the public and other navies to believe, or is filled with idiots: pick two.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hi Speed</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> With our government and media. PLEASE! We can't win the two wars we are in now b/c the media lets the enemy know where we are, how many of us there are, what were bringing, how were getting it there, when were getting there. Some things should not be privy to the public, especially before it even happens. All this is only worsened by sheeple who just don't get what war really is and a government that can't get it's head out of it's ass long enough to realize it's our true worst enemy. </div></div>

The media certainly doesnt let anything go to anyone. They have to get through PAO's to clear it. CNN has tried repeatedly to do some sneaky shit back in iraq, but they were caught. Mainstream media thinks that since they shot footage of classified shit, and its their equipment, that they are free to do whatever. Nice try cameramen, i'll break all your fucking equipment and have you detained.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Back to the originaal post....Not to wax religious, but the apolyptic vision of John regarding Armageddon spoke of armies of "thousands and thousands of thousands". Between the Chinks and the (east) Indians, they could field an army of that size and get it to the Iran area. That could get real nasty.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Many military strategists are of the opinion that a US war with Iran, because they have no airpower capability and an almost non-existant capacity to threaten US carriers, would be short and brutal: That they would be wiped-out in short order as Iraq was (and in much the same way as Iraq was).

</div></div>

I normally steer clear of these topics, but I'll put in my two cents and get my point across in short order.

I don't believe we will see war in Iran anytime soon. For those few of us who understand the political structure of the country, we know one thing for a fact. A war in Iran would result in WWIII due to the fact that the Israelis would have to become involved. Hamas would transport mass munitions and troops from throughout Syria and Lebanon across their allied Northern Iraq to Iran.

China? You really don't want to go there. They have a ground force that could easily occupy Iran and match US troops 3 to 1.

In my opinion, we're going to poke the wrong hornet's nest one day, and get our asses handed to us in the process. Our economy could not handle the strain of another Middle East conflict, and it would almost definitely lead to the demise of our monetary system.

I'm sorry, but the days of bringing a country out of an economic depression through a war act is long gone. The only reason we were brought out of the Great Depression via WWII was because of the sale of War Bonds. I honestly don't see Americans in today's technology age buying war bonds to bring a country out of economic turmoil. Especially in the age of "Me and Mine" that we live in today here in this country.

Enough said.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

No one under 21 cares about these trivial issues.

As long as they have newest smart phone, Ipad, wifi and name brand clothing "who cares?".
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shankster</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No one under 21 cares about these trial issues.

As long as they have newest smart phone, Ipad, wifi and name brand clothing "who cares?". </div></div>

<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">BACK OFF MY WIFI MOTHER F#$</span></span>... *breathing*... Sorry dude... I was having withdraws from just the thought.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Well, I put some of that together half asleep.
China: they have a huge army 5 million man standing not counting reserves if I remember. Let me remind those of you who seem to think China wont confront the US militarily. Korea, 500,000 Chinese soldiers. Yes China’s military is hampered by soviet style doctrine. How many waves of Chinese troops did it take to take a better trained and equipped US position? The Germans during WW2 had the best trained and equipped military in the world at that time. The Soviets just kept sending waves of troops to the front. We all know the Germans lost and it wasn’t due to a lack of effort. The Soviets over whelmed them with troops, and if you are losing more people than you can replace you will lose. (Eventually).
China has bought lots of Russian equipment. They reverse engineer it and manufacture it themselves. Yes on the outside the aircraft carrier looks like junk, but what is inside? The Chinese submarine fleet of Russian attack subs, very scary. The boat captains were all trained by the British at their Navy school for sub captains. Most people in the world know how big a mistake it would be to underestimate China.
Russia: They have made their position on Iran clear. If Iran is attacked Russia will consider it and attack on Russia itself! Russia has already sold everything on the Iranian wish list. Why? Simple Russia makes too much money on Iran. The real kicker here is no one is worried about the US military due to the weak POTUS that is in charge now. The Russians know that they have a chance to grab a sphere of influence while the US is under weak management.
Iran: Air force not so good. Anti aircraft teams have top of the line Russian equipment and were trained in Russia, and are good. Navy well not so good either. Missile technology, very good. Thanks you Russia and China. Terrorist groups that take orders from Iran are quite good, at being terrorists. I’m hoping that some of the older crowd remembers the Beirut Marine barracks bombing. Hezbollah (party of G-D) a Shia terror group that is ran, trained and equipped by Iran. Army is better than the Iraqi military and Afghanistan military after 10 years of US equipment and training. Please don’t forget the mentality of these people. During the Iran Iraq war the Iranian army use to go by soccer fields and gather up all the children so they could help demine areas. “Run children run” well that area is much more safe for our troops now!
Those who like to say how the US navy is invincible. I would like to remind you of the Falklands war. The British Navy had no respect for the Argentineans navy. Well unbeknown to the British the Argentineans had purchased anti ship missiles. How many ships did the British navy loose?
Suez Canal is kind of narrow and so is the Strait of Hormuz. I wonder how many anti ship missiles it would take for the US navy to get the hint. Probably nothing due to the current POTUS not allowing the US military to be involved.
Bottom line: Iran knows they have to have the bomb before the US president changes. Israel will have to deal with them before they get there. The US will not be involved. After Israel hits and deals with Iran they will be in a full scale all out war. Hezbollah in Lebanon and maybe even Syria, Egypt will have to help their Arabs brothers and Israel will have to deal with the Arab fifth column inside Israel.
The Chinese will probably not involve themselves in at this time. The Russians have a large navy contingent ported in Syria, and are providing weapons and may even attempt to put up a naval blockade of Israel. The Russian army doesn’t have enough transports to put any real number of troops on the ground. Turkey has been getting and selling things to Iran will they help or won’t they hard to say.
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

Its predicted that Israel will attack the nuke plants in Iran in the next few months. Israel is gonna take care of this little problem for us
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mustafa</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Of course, when you combine that with a missile launch off the coast of CA, you can see that China is VERY concerned with making their submarine fleet at least LOOK very threatening.
</div></div>


But...but...my gubermint tells me that was the reflection off of an airliner....



Good luck
 
Re: CouldWar w/ Iran be Bloodiest Conflict Since WWII?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Truckman11</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Its predicted that Israel will attack the nuke plants in Iran in the next few months. Israel is gonna take care of this little problem for us </div></div>

I'll drink to that any day!