<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sgt. 0811</div><div class="ubbcode-body">How could that happen in a state that doesn't allow assault rifles or high capacity magazines? </div></div>
I'm confused too. I thought that banning weapons stopped crazy from being crazy?
Hmmm.....only two shot and reported as wounded and not killed. Still no real details but I can see this as positive promotional material for the anti's. California has banned assault weapons and hi-cap mags along with implementing some very strict gun laws. As a result of these measures the suspect did not have the capability to fire as many rounds as fast as he could have if he used an assault rifle and hi-cap mags.
Time will tell but that's what I can see happening.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jcfd2201</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Still no real details</div></div>
Takes a little while to plant ARs and High-cap mags around the scene. Maybe the local Sheriff who is known for his Rocket launcher buy-backs will plant that evil "bazooka" on the scene too.
If anyone noted, not one of the latest mayhem incidents was done with anything more than a pistol/s and common standard magazines. Not one so called assault rifle or high capacity magazine was used, but the entire left is screaming for their bans. Oh wait, you're right, they never make sense. nevermind...
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The gunman had as many as 20 rounds of ammunition in his pocket, the sheriff said.</div></div>
I'm surprised they aren't referring to it as an assault pocket and calling for their ban.