Dnt optics real world experience

Offroad 22

Private
Minuteman
Jun 2, 2020
3
1
Hey guys I’ve been looking at possibly getting a little into the thermal game and came across DNT but I’m having a hard time finding people who have actually been using these for a more hunting oriented set up. There seems to be plenty of sponsored/semi sponsored videos on YouTube, which seem mostly positive but then again I couldn’t find anybody that had a review that wasn’t sent the optic for free. Just trying to figure out
if a slightly lower price point is worth it or if I’ll be better off going with a 384 in a more well-known brand.
 
I have two DNT optics. Both are the Thermnight TNC335R models. I use them to hunt coyotes (not legal to hunt big game with it in my state.) So far so good but I've only had them for 10 months. I liked the first one enough to buy another before the price increases with the tariff stuff earlier this year. I don't know anything about their other thermals (Ex. Hydra) but if they have the same core and algo they should be good too. My thermnight smokes my two iray 384 scopes from a sensitivity perspective, but Iray has come out with new stuff since the original rl25 I bought so that may be a bad comparison but they are both 384 cores I believe and there is no comparison while the Iray cost me a lot more. The surprising thing is that often the 384 core DNT picks up stuff my pulsar helion 2 xp50 pro (684 core) does not so it seems at times that it is more sensitive but I haven't looked up the specs in a long time. Prior to owning the DNT thermnight I had strong opinions about Pulsar's algo smoking the Iray models I owned as far as sensitivity/flaring/etc.... That hasn't been the case with this DNT optic and I am sure Iray's newer stuff is way better too.

The thermnight model is cool with the various features but also clunky. Ex. focusing the thermal is tough with gloves on and even without gloves on because all the lenses are packed together tightly and that lens just isn't easy to get your hand over and onto. I don't mess with the focusing on the thermal much as a result but sometimes you have to when you are stretching a shot. Focusing the digital image is easy as there is a bit of a lever and it is on top.

Daytime use of the digital part is ok. I thought it would be nicer but there is ZERO comparison to a traditional scope of almost any quality... the image is just not as clear and I don't like it as much. However, using it at night to get a better identification of critters is cool and works well most of the time. Not so good with thick hunting conditions with the IR light hitting foliage/etc..., but works really well out in the open. The other knock is there are a lot of buttons on the thing with both Digital and Thermal lenses and sometimes I hit the wrong button when I have gloves on but I've gotten better navigating all the choices.

DNT has been great to work with too. I lost the rubber eye piece hunting in the woods and they sent me a new one free of charge. How excellent is that!!! I haven't had to contact them for any issues with the scope.

The ballistics app works well but I haven't stretched shooting beyond about 400 yards at night so can't say how accurate it is beyond that.
 
I have two DNT optics. Both are the Thermnight TNC335R models. I use them to hunt coyotes (not legal to hunt big game with it in my state.) So far so good but I've only had them for 10 months. I liked the first one enough to buy another before the price increases with the tariff stuff earlier this year. I don't know anything about their other thermals (Ex. Hydra) but if they have the same core and algo they should be good too. My thermnight smokes my two iray 384 scopes from a sensitivity perspective, but Iray has come out with new stuff since the original rl25 I bought so that may be a bad comparison but they are both 384 cores I believe and there is no comparison while the Iray cost me a lot more. The surprising thing is that often the 384 core DNT picks up stuff my pulsar helion 2 xp50 pro (684 core) does not so it seems at times that it is more sensitive but I haven't looked up the specs in a long time. Prior to owning the DNT thermnight I had strong opinions about Pulsar's algo smoking the Iray models I owned as far as sensitivity/flaring/etc.... That hasn't been the case with this DNT optic and I am sure Iray's newer stuff is way better too.

The thermnight model is cool with the various features but also clunky. Ex. focusing the thermal is tough with gloves on and even without gloves on because all the lenses are packed together tightly and that lens just isn't easy to get your hand over and onto. I don't mess with the focusing on the thermal much as a result but sometimes you have to when you are stretching a shot. Focusing the digital image is easy as there is a bit of a lever and it is on top.

Daytime use of the digital part is ok. I thought it would be nicer but there is ZERO comparison to a traditional scope of almost any quality... the image is just not as clear and I don't like it as much. However, using it at night to get a better identification of critters is cool and works well most of the time. Not so good with thick hunting conditions with the IR light hitting foliage/etc..., but works really well out in the open. The other knock is there are a lot of buttons on the thing with both Digital and Thermal lenses and sometimes I hit the wrong button when I have gloves on but I've gotten better navigating all the choices.

DNT has been great to work with too. I lost the rubber eye piece hunting in the woods and they sent me a new one free of charge. How excellent is that!!! I haven't had to contact them for any issues with the scope.

The ballistics app works well but I haven't stretched shooting beyond about 400 yards at night so can't say how accurate it is beyond that.
Thanks a lot that’s really helpful. I’m Mostly looking at the Hydro line just because I’m not a huge fan of all the lenses and extra buttons on the thermonight, especially since they came out with a rangefinder on the Hydro line now as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: ping
I have a hydra hs635 on a 204 Ruger and it works great. I have had it for about 6 months and use it a lot. It has held zero without needing any adjustment. I use it for coyotes and varmints within 250 yards. I previously had a Bering Optics Hogster 35 for a few years and the Hydra 640 has a better image with better detection and recognition. The buttons and controls are easy to use and the recoil activated video works great. At the $2000 price I am not disappointed.
 
Hey guys I’ve been looking at possibly getting a little into the thermal game and came across DNT but I’m having a hard time finding people who have actually been using these for a more hunting oriented set up. There seems to be plenty of sponsored/semi sponsored videos on YouTube, which seem mostly positive but then again I couldn’t find anybody that had a review that wasn’t sent the optic for free. Just trying to figure out
if a slightly lower price point is worth it or if I’ll be better off going with a 384 in a more well-known brand.
I had the one last month and sent it back, wouldn't hold zero or track. Now, this can happen with any scope manufacturer; the customer service was phenomenal and issued a full refund. I've since then opted for a Maven RS 4 which looks very promising , built like a tank as clear as scopes costing 1k more through my eyes, got her sighted in and will test her on late season groundhogs Saturday. I wouldn't hesitate with DNT as mine was just ba fluke i'm sure and some of their other optics I've heard great things about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Offroad 22