• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Doing wierd, backwards stuff to my DPMS LR........

Hellbender

Gunny Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Apr 23, 2008
1,558
315
Lebanon, Missouri
CAVEAT: Don't try this on your .308, this entire gun will be set up and optimized for one bullet and load combo......

ANYWAY:
I hate the recoil impulse of the big AR10/LR-series rifles, it makes the rifles very difficult to shoot accurately and quickly compared to their lighter brothers, the AR15 series. I have an OLY based 243 WSSM (AR15) and it recoils and stays on target UNBELIEVABLY well compared to an LR I have of the same weight. The heavy BCG really moves the bigger guns around a lot.

The common wisdom is to ADD weight to smooth things out, and this has merit in certain cases, mainly to cure problems that cannot be easily fixed on a stock gun.

I'm building another DPMS LR in 6mm Super LR (basically a .243 Win with longer neck and sharp shoulder) with a 7.5" twist Krieger bbl, throated for DTAC's at mag length.

There are only 3 basic things that will be different in the recoil equation in these 2 rifles (AR vs. LR), as both have the same cartridge case capacity, velocity, and can shoot the same bullets.

1. Recoiling mass
2. Strength of recoil spring
3. Length of this masses movement.

I believe the biggest difference is #1, the amount of recoiling mass, as luck would have it this is also about the only one I can modify.

I took some weights with an accurate scale.

DPMS LR –– Bolt and carrier ass'y weighs 18.8 ozs, Buffer, 5.4 ozs, total 24.2 ozs.

AR15 WSSM –– Bolt and carrier ass'y, 12.0 ozs, Buffer, 5.1 ozs, total 17.1 ozs

LR is 7.1 ounces heavier than AR, over 40% heavier!! It also moves .7 inches further rearward.

I called JP Enterprises and inquired about purchasing one of their Low Mass Carriers, which supposedly weigh 11.5 ozs compared to the stock carrier @ 15.3 Ozs.

They said they are not in production yet and would give no estimate on production date.

OK............ I'll just do it myself...........

DSC04810.jpg


DSC04813.jpg


After the mods and coating it with teflon/moly, it weighs 12.0 ozs, I cut off 3.3 ozs. of weight here.

Then I pulled 4 weights out of the buffer and added 2 of the aluminum spacers to reduce buffer weight to 3.4 ozs. This still leaves 2 steel weights and some "buffing" rattle to stop bolt bounce (if I need to lose more weight, I have some other options with the buffer)

I reduced the total reciprocating weight by a total of 5.2 ozs, about 25% lighter, a total mass of 19.0 ozs., compared to 24.2 stock.

I'm still 1.9 ozs heavier than the AR15, but believe this will make a HUGE difference in the recoil feel and gun movement.

The gas port is being drilled undersized so I can ream it out as needed and I will also have an adjustable gas block. I can also make TUBB style weights to add carrier weight back in if needed.

I'm also using a 2" extended gas system, to allow the use of the slower burning powders the 6mm's need with the DTAC's.

My chambered barrel should be here in the next week or two, I'll keep you posted.
 
Re: Doing wierd, backwards stuff to my DPMS LR........

Just an FYI. (I'm pretty sure you already know this)
Lightening the reciprocating masses will increase the energy that the masses receive from the gas system.
It is likely that the gas port will need to be a little smaller than standard to achieve the same cycle energy.

I'm really interested and impressed with this.
Nice work!
 
Re: Doing wierd, backwards stuff to my DPMS LR........

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hamilton</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Just an FYI. (I'm pretty sure you already know this)
Lightening the reciprocating masses will increase the energy that the masses receive from the gas system.
It is likely that the gas port will need to be a little smaller than standard to achieve the same cycle energy.
</div></div>

I added a couple of paragraphs to the end of my post to explain the gas system mods.
 
Re: Doing wierd, backwards stuff to my DPMS LR........

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hamilton</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Just an FYI. (I'm pretty sure you already know this)
Lightening the reciprocating masses will increase the energy that the masses receive from the gas system.
It is likely that the gas port will need to be a little smaller than standard to achieve the same cycle energy.

I'm really interested and impressed with this.
Nice work! </div></div>

Or simply add an adjustable gas block to control gas flow.

Taking weight out has been the norm for quite a while in the three gun world. Less mass = less energy causing recoil.

Benny Hill @ Triangle Shooting Sports in Corpus Christi does these same mods and you wind up with a really nice shooting gun.

 
Re: Doing wierd, backwards stuff to my DPMS LR........

LoneWolf.......

The weight WILL tame it down, but at the expense of a much longer (time wise) operating cycle. The slower the gun cycles, the longer it takes to get back on target, AND the more movement, both rearward and (mainly) forward, adding to the "triple recoil" effect. I'd keep a spare bolt stop handy, and make sure your bolt stop over-run is correct, because it will really get beat on.

What you are attempting to do is compensate for an over-gassed (pressure and/or volume, two different things) gun. The manufacturers have to size their gas ports to be 100% reliable with every ammo on the market, and most of us reloaders use much slower burning propellants than the "worst case" these guns are ported for, causing very high port pressure AND volume.

It seems to make more sense to me to attack the problem at the source, i.e. turning down the gas pressure/volume.

On a stock gun, the easiest way is to stick on an adjustable gas block, you can also help a little by using Quickload and developing a load with a lower port pressure, you might be able to knock it down by 10-20% if you are using a very slow burning powder now.

At the match today, I was talking to a guy that had been through the Tubb weight, Slash buffer, etc, etc, thing on his GAP upper, he finally removed it all and put on an AGB and is much happier now. He may chime in later with his experiences, he has been watching this post.

Anyway, that's my take, and you know what that's worth!
 
Re: Doing wierd, backwards stuff to my DPMS LR........

I do see what you are saying and I understand the mechanics of it, however there is a point where the math says one thing and what is noticeable in the real world is something else.

I can tell you that with the Tubb CWS and the tungsten weight installed the cycle time is still fast enough that I am resetting the trigger while watching the round impact.

I still have some playing about to do. Remember that game guns and work guns have different functional parameters. A bit of extra oompf on the carrier is nice when you are covered in mud, snow, ice, etc.
 
Re: Doing wierd, backwards stuff to my DPMS LR........

Very true, everything I am doing is for a game gun, tailored to one load, made for match conditions.

For a duty gun, what I am doing would be stupidity, and has no application whatsoever.
 
I'm building another DPMS LR in 6mm Super LR (basically a .243 Win with longer neck and sharp shoulder) with a 7.5" twist Krieger bbl, throated for DTAC's at mag length.

Sorry for the necrobump. Hellbender, did you ever finish this? What gas port size did you use, and how did it work out? I'm halfway considering almost this exact project, apparently we think a lot a like. I have a 6mm Bartlein 1/8 and a 6 SLR reamer that I intended to put on a bolt rifle, but I'm kicking around the idea of putting it on a DPMS G2 (that already has the lighter BCG.) I'd planned on an extended gas system as well.