Re: F-ing sick of gun shows
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: konabully</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: eleaf</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Assumming tatoos = "criminal element" is a dangerous slope.
What next? I don't disagree that there are good and bad people of all kinds, but that's not what you said. </div></div>
There was no "assuming". I have been professionally trained to identify gang related tattoos. This includes origins, rank, and status within a gang, etc. So you are the internet fairy godmother out there "assuming" his heart out, that I am a racist and don't like tattoos. I also have tattoos, just not known gang tats about my face, neck and head.
If there is anything I am prejuced about, it is people with "pointy heads". The errudite and over-educated beyond their own capabilities crowd who "assume". They are the self-appointed servants of political correctness. They are the great unappreciated martyrs who point their boney fingers to all, to defend those who "might" or "may" be offended by things of which they do not understand. You know, the "I'm the smartest one in the room" and "my opinion matters more than yours" crowd.
Obviously, you know nothing about gangs or criminals in general. Let alone, any inkling of law enforcement procedure. Do you even own a precision rifle or do you just come in here to stir the pot and pontificate your group-think ideas?
Apparently, I am wasting my time on the ignorant and I shouldn't waste another key stroke. The fact that I need to clarify or defend my previous statements to YOU, or otherwise have my words twisted beyond their original intent is rather galling. The thought police have arrived.
</div></div>
Where had you mentioned, amongst just about every cultural stereotype about Mexicans, that you are trained in identifying gang related tats?
Oh, yeah, that would be nowhere. So you saw it fit to throw out the gamut of racist comments, yet failed to mention the single qualification you have to identify one as a gang member and you wonder why someone has the gall to call you a racist?
Perhaps had you stuck with the material evidence, rather than the anecdotal bullshit, people wouldn't be making any assumptions. Even then, considering you have the training necessary to identify gang members by their tats, yet willfully chose to omit it in favor of the stereotypes, things seem pretty clear.