I'm loading up some practice ammo using Montana gold 165gr JHP's and Hodgedon Tite-Group. The problem is for one thing, there's no specific load info for MG bullets. And the second is, I'm getting conflicting data from reloading manuals, hodgdons website, and the jug of hodgedon powder. they all give different min and max loads. I would say significantly different considering the speed of Tite-group and the low quantity of powder required for the load.
And I stole this from a guy on the brian enos forum because he put it into words perfectly:
<span style="font-style: italic">"From a safety point of view, an important issue when changing the bullet is what that does to the internal volume of the case. For any given amount of powder, less space means higher pressure when the primer ignites the powder.
If the new bullet is shorter than the one in the original load, and you assemble the round with the same overall length, the difference in length means there is more space in the case, and pressure will be lower. If the new bullet is longer, loading to the same OAL means less space and higher pressure. (Either case assumes that the bullet bases are the same, and assumes also that they are of the same weight).
IF you have the dimensions of the original bullet you can make an adjustment in OAL for the new bullet that compensates. For example, if the new bullet is shorter by 0.010", then the internal case volume will be the same as with the original bullet if the OAL is shortened by the same amount.
If you DON'T have the dimensions, then you have to start low with a published load (preferably one from the new bullet manufacturer or the powder manufacturer) and work up."</span>
My other issue is, I'm using mixed headstamp brass. You think thats safe considering the possibility of slight differences in case thickness/capacity, etc between manufacturers when using a powder like Tite-group?
What I'm worried about is I load up a case from say federal and the load is fine, the next case is a winchester case and say it's thicker, or (not sure if it's possible) the case head is thicker, making the case capacity smaller, in turn making the round hot or even dangerous.
Am I overthinking things?
And I stole this from a guy on the brian enos forum because he put it into words perfectly:
<span style="font-style: italic">"From a safety point of view, an important issue when changing the bullet is what that does to the internal volume of the case. For any given amount of powder, less space means higher pressure when the primer ignites the powder.
If the new bullet is shorter than the one in the original load, and you assemble the round with the same overall length, the difference in length means there is more space in the case, and pressure will be lower. If the new bullet is longer, loading to the same OAL means less space and higher pressure. (Either case assumes that the bullet bases are the same, and assumes also that they are of the same weight).
IF you have the dimensions of the original bullet you can make an adjustment in OAL for the new bullet that compensates. For example, if the new bullet is shorter by 0.010", then the internal case volume will be the same as with the original bullet if the OAL is shortened by the same amount.
If you DON'T have the dimensions, then you have to start low with a published load (preferably one from the new bullet manufacturer or the powder manufacturer) and work up."</span>
My other issue is, I'm using mixed headstamp brass. You think thats safe considering the possibility of slight differences in case thickness/capacity, etc between manufacturers when using a powder like Tite-group?
What I'm worried about is I load up a case from say federal and the load is fine, the next case is a winchester case and say it's thicker, or (not sure if it's possible) the case head is thicker, making the case capacity smaller, in turn making the round hot or even dangerous.
Am I overthinking things?