Re: Getting Rid of the Vertical
Yeah, all this talk of potential positional problems is all fine and good but ignores the OP's information.
ONE group with a different powder doesn't do it.
ASSuming that neither posted group is a fluke (that's why the NRA does 5, 5-round groups), then yes, look to load development.
First, clues may be in velocity spread. The slowest might not be the lowest impact, especially at 100, but DATA is your friend.
Second, clues could be in light/atmospherics. Mirage can move the image of your target that far (1 inch at 100) if it's there for some shots but not for others. Conditions can change quickly, and even heat from the barrel can mess things up.
Third, seating depth is something to try. I have no idea what to expect other than lower velocity loaded longer. I'm not the guy to ask and I wish someone who's fiddled with this a lot will chime in. The one time I saw it done it was a Rem700 with a quarter-inch of freebore and it didn't make much difference in vertical OR horizontal dispersion.
Fourth, primers sometimes make a difference. That's part of load development! Or at least fine-tuning. My favorite load seems to shoot better with regular CCI 200s than BR-2s. Yeah. Not ready to re-test WLRs, but I have about 3,000 of them...
Fifth, shooter fatigue and possible positional elements still need to be considered, especially if this is a one-group sample of each. From a stats standpoint, I like 15 total shots for accuracy testing. Groups are smaller with 3shots than with 5, so don't compare apples to oranges. But get a reliable sample.
Sixth, I refuse to speculate on the efficacy of sacrificing a spoonful of powder as a burnt offering to the Accuracy Gods, since I'm a Christian-type guy who avoids that stuff.