I'm building a new load up with the 208 and my magazine is 3.700, so I can load about 3.600 (.30-06) and still have .1 clearance.
Now let me also mention I'm getting my action trued along with a Rock Creek barrel being chambered, so whatever dummy cartridge I make for him, my gunsmith will chamber it so that I have .01-.015 jump to lands. so if I make my round 3.600, he will have a 3.610-3.615 chamber for me.
Is my goal pretty much to get the longest bullet seating that sits in my magazine? (yes I'm gonna use the magazine)
or is there something else that I'm looking for to get the right seating depth. I obviously can't do any load testing to see which seating depth would work since he is going to build the rifle/barrel off of the dummy I give him.
I've been running numbers on QL, and with a 3.600 seated 208 amax, and Norma MRP, I can hit ~2800-2820 fps with 58000 psi out of a 27 inch barrel, which is pretty damn good. shortening it to 3.500 takes about 10fps. 3.650 was 15 more fps
Now let me also mention I'm getting my action trued along with a Rock Creek barrel being chambered, so whatever dummy cartridge I make for him, my gunsmith will chamber it so that I have .01-.015 jump to lands. so if I make my round 3.600, he will have a 3.610-3.615 chamber for me.
Is my goal pretty much to get the longest bullet seating that sits in my magazine? (yes I'm gonna use the magazine)
or is there something else that I'm looking for to get the right seating depth. I obviously can't do any load testing to see which seating depth would work since he is going to build the rifle/barrel off of the dummy I give him.
I've been running numbers on QL, and with a 3.600 seated 208 amax, and Norma MRP, I can hit ~2800-2820 fps with 58000 psi out of a 27 inch barrel, which is pretty damn good. shortening it to 3.500 takes about 10fps. 3.650 was 15 more fps