• 1 WEEK LEFT: This Target Haunts Me Contest

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

Gov. Hochul Claims Concealed Carry Permit Allowed Manhattan Shooter to Have AR-15

PatMiles

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 25, 2017
1,707
4,840
CLAIM: During a gun control rant on CNN’s Inside Politics, Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) noted the alleged Manhattan shooter had a concealed carry permit and claimed the permit allowed him to have an AR-15.
VERDICT: False. Having a concealed carry permit centers on the carrying of handguns for self-defense, not rifles.
Moreover, having a concealed carry permit does not allow a visitor to ignore the laws of a state to which they travel. The alleged Manhattan shooter had driven across the country to New York, and in New York there is a prohibition against guns which Democrats refer to as “assault weapons.”
To take it even further, even if having a concealed carry permit pertained to rifles–which it does not–New York does not recognize the concealed carry permit from any of the other 49 states, according to USCCA.
Additionally, as news of Monday’s shooting broke on Breitbart News, we noted that Mike Bloomberg-affiliated Everytown for Gun Safety ranks New York as No. 4 in the country for stringent gun control, in part because the state bans “assault weapons.” Nevertheless, the alleged attacker used an AR-platform rifle in Manhattan, the very kind of rifle that Democrats refer to “assault weapons.”
Although New York’s “assault weapons” ban failed to prevent the Manhattan attack, Hochul made clear she believes such a ban on a national level would equate to being “tough on crime.”
Similar claims were made by Democrats during the Clinton administration.
On September 13, 1994, the New York Times ran a column explaining that the very term “assault weapon” was one that “Democrats created” in the 1990s in order to ban “a politically defined category of guns.” The NYT noted there was “a spike in gun crime,” so 1990s Democrats found something they could ban in order to allow themselves to appear to be fighting crime.
Same song, different verse.
 
...the New York Times ran a column explaining that the very term “assault weapon” was one that “Democrats created” in the 1990s in order to ban “a politically defined category of guns...”
Ima blame these books here:
91h8PwcapqL._SL1500_.jpg
1st edition published at least as early as 1986. Semi-autos were listed in the book as variants of legit battle rifles.
Some States simply used the contents of the book as a template for their assault weapons ban lists.
But yeah, never let a serious crisis go to waste.
 
AR pistol? Judge for yourself.
View attachment 8737563
Look close at your pic, see the strap runs through the back like on a SB Tactical brace?
In this crop from the NY Post pic, you can see where the two sides of the cuff form a void below the body of the brace:
000.png

Full NY Post pic shows a 10.5 or 11.5 barrel.
What do you see it being?
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeroz
Look close at your pic, see the strap runs through the back like on a SB Tactical brace?
In this crop from the NY Post pic, you can see where the two sides of the cuff form a void below the body of the brace:
View attachment 8737569
Full NY Post pic shows a 10.5 or 11.5 barrel.
What do you see it being?
It’s not like an SB brace, it is an SBA4

1753902056157.png

1753902148754.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: kli3309