I've tried every which way to get GRT to run on my Mac with various programs, but no joy. Hopefully I'm asking the right questions giving the right inputs.
I plan on living with this cartridge for a while. I'm invested in it, have several more barrels and am not interested in making a change at least through '26. That said, I've tried both N140 and 150 and they both shoot. I'm purely curious what the modeling says is the better choice if I wanted to land on one. Aiming for 90% + fill (alpha and gap) and a 100% (or close to it) burn rate, around 2800 + - . I THINK it's going to be 150, but I'd love to see what the data says if anyone is so inclined. Sorry if I'm missing key inputs, as I haven't got to play around with it, e.g. water volume; I realize these are two different brass brands, but if you're only willing to run one, go with Alpha. Just a general idea from the model vs. real world experience with these powders.
6GT
Alpha & GAP brass
26" barrel
105 hybrids
.060 ish jump
Thank you!
I plan on living with this cartridge for a while. I'm invested in it, have several more barrels and am not interested in making a change at least through '26. That said, I've tried both N140 and 150 and they both shoot. I'm purely curious what the modeling says is the better choice if I wanted to land on one. Aiming for 90% + fill (alpha and gap) and a 100% (or close to it) burn rate, around 2800 + - . I THINK it's going to be 150, but I'd love to see what the data says if anyone is so inclined. Sorry if I'm missing key inputs, as I haven't got to play around with it, e.g. water volume; I realize these are two different brass brands, but if you're only willing to run one, go with Alpha. Just a general idea from the model vs. real world experience with these powders.
6GT
Alpha & GAP brass
26" barrel
105 hybrids
.060 ish jump
Thank you!