Rifle Scopes Hands on experience Tango 4 6-24x50mm

[Willie16wild]

I was seeing if anyone had any hands on experience will the Sig Sauer Tango 4 6-24x50mm? I am looking to see what you think of the clarity compared to other scopes. If do have any experience with the tango 4 6-24x50mm please say what scope you are comparing it with.

I would definitely like to know if you had any experience with the tango 4 6-24x50mm and vortex viper PST 6-24x50mm/ Gen II PST 5-25x50mm. That only is if you had some experience with both these scopes.

I also want to see what you think of the reticle in the tango 4 6-24x50mm.

Well I hope to hear back from some of you guys here soon. Thanks and have a good day.

 

[Pan]

From my limited experience with Tango in the field, I wasn't blown away by it. It's about the same league as swfa scopes

 

[Big Bo]

I looked at the PST & T4 in 6-24x50, side by side. T4 has clearer glass, better colors. The turn off for me is the plastic on the T4.

 

[OinCO again]

the single example I looked through was less than underwhelming. dark, surprisingly murky off of center above about 14-15x? YMMV

 

[IanHusaberg]

I'm impressed with my tango 4 3-12x42 FFP. I think the quality of the glass is great and the colors seen thru it, for the $. Its better than a Burris XTR 2. Only draw back I saw with the 6-24, is the internal MOA travel and the weight.

 

[MWM-5150]

Never owned one but messed around with several, the 4-16 and 6-24. I was not a fan of the turrets on the Tango4 scopes. I wouldn't say they were 'mushy' just a soft click, and the clicks were not audible. Additionally, I found the numbers difficult to read, this was a no-go for me since I shoot often at dawn/dusk. The G1 PST turret markings are much more visible. However, to me the Tango4 (4-16) glass seemed a little clearer with an easier eyebox than that of my 4-16 Gen1 PST, the 6-24 Tango offers a similar step up in clarity.

For the same money I like the turret mechanics better on the XTR2 or I would wait for the PST G2. The 5-25 PST G2 will provide a much nicer FOV than the Tango 4 6-24.

The reticle provided in the Gen2 PST is much better as well. The Vortex EBR-2 reticles are about the best on the market IMHO.

 

[Willie16wild]

It's been awhile since I been on here but I did get a Tango4 6-24 mil. It is a nice scope. The illuminated reticle is great though. The only thing is when I get it up to 18-20 power it gets dark so I keep it mostly around 18. It does track true though from my experience.

 

[entoptics]

I just posted a run down of the Tango4 reticle, so check that out for some images and subtension information.

https://www.snipershide.com/shootin...oa-reticle-photos-and-subtension-measurements

Unfortunately I've only had it a couple days and haven't had a chance to get the scope out in the field yet, so I can't really speak to glass quality beyond my gut reaction looking out my window. I've got quite a bit of experience with upper mid-range glass (Vortex HS-T, Bushnell Elite 6500, and Leupold VX3 LR, and I'm fairly confident the Tango4 is as good as any other glass with comparable price and features.

 

[PhOnEpHrEaK]

I’ve had my T4 6x24 for a year now, and have fired 2500 rounds with it mounted on my 6.5 from 100-1000 yards. Personally I love this scope. I have a T6 3x18 as well and I honestly can’t say that the T4 gives up much at all. I also have a PST gen 2 5x25. As far as tracking and clarity vs the T4 I would say they are equal. Though for me the advantage would go to the reticle on the PST . I prefer the zerostop of the T4 over the PST and I like the feel of the turrets better. I have no regrets about buying the T4, and I will probably own another scope in that series at some point.