Help me find all options

Burdy

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Supporter
  • Jul 10, 2013
    2,055
    2,022
    Looking for a scope for a particular use case. These are the features I need:
    Side parallax
    Low magnification no higher than 3x
    High magnification no lower than 10x
    Objective no smaller than 36mm
    Weight no more than 22 oz
    Length no longer than 13"
    Glass quality as high as possible

    I'll keep updating this current list as the thread goes along:
    ScopeLow MagHigh MagObjectiveSide FocusLength (inches)Weight (oz)Tube Diameter
    (Current) Razor HD LH1.5832No1113.41"
    Swaro Z8i+1.71342Yes13.221.930
    Steiner H6Xi21242Yes11.823.230
    NF NXS 2.51042Yes11.920.530
    March F32442Yes12.2820.8130
    Steiner Predator 4S41644Yes10.918.130
    USO TS-12X31244Yes9.618.1130
    GPO Centuri31244YES9.918.930
    GPO Centuri41644Yes9.92030
     
    Last edited:
    Looking for a scope for a particular use case. These are the features I need:
    Side parallax
    Low magnification no higher than 3x
    High magnification no lower than 10x
    Objective no smaller than 36mm
    Weight no more than 22 oz
    Length no longer than 13"
    Glass quality as high as possible
    Ah....and how much money are you budgeting for this?
     
    Looking for a scope for a particular use case. These are the features I need:
    Side parallax
    Low magnification no higher than 3x
    High magnification no lower than 10x
    Objective no smaller than 36mm
    Weight no more than 22 oz
    Length no longer than 13"
    Glass quality as high as possible
    If you can deal with an additional 1.2 oz, the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42 should meet all the other requirements.
     
    If you can deal with an additional 1.2 oz, the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42 should meet all the other requirements.
    Going to look at that one. Anyone have experience with the Steiner Predator 4S? It's only missing the 3x bottom end. Very unique feature set. 4-16x44 10.9" long, 18 ounces.

    Another one that almost makes it is the Swaro Z8 1.7-13.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: StephenShivers
    I’d look at these (double check specs before you buy, and prices may have also changed from when I gathered this info). I included the Delta Stryker even though it’s above 3x it’s a pretty wide FOV so it’s comparable to many 3x scopes. Your weight limitation is a tough one but it’s one I happen to agree with you on!


    S&B Meta 3-18x42
    $4100
    FFP, 105 MOA adjustment range (12 Mils/Rev)
    28oz, 12.91” long

    March 3-24x52
    $2900
    FFP, 115 MOA adjustment range (10 Mils/Rev)
    23.5 ounces, 13.2” long

    NF NX8 F1 2.5-20x50
    FFP, 109 MOA adjustment range (10 Mils/Rev)
    28.3 oz, 12” long

    Delta Stryker 3.5-21x44
    $1600
    FFP, 153 MOA adjustment range (10 Mils/Rev)
    28.4 ounces, 12.5” long,
     
    I’d look at these (double check specs before you buy, and prices may have also changed from when I gathered this info). I included the Delta Stryker even though it’s above 3x it’s a pretty wide FOV so it’s comparable to many 3x scopes. Your weight limitation is a tough one but it’s one I happen to agree with you on!


    S&B Meta 3-18x42
    $4100
    FFP, 105 MOA adjustment range (12 Mils/Rev)
    28oz, 12.91” long

    March 3-24x52
    $2900
    FFP, 115 MOA adjustment range (10 Mils/Rev)
    23.5 ounces, 13.2” long

    NF NX8 F1 2.5-20x50
    FFP, 109 MOA adjustment range (10 Mils/Rev)
    28.3 oz, 12” long

    Delta Stryker 3.5-21x44
    $1600
    FFP, 153 MOA adjustment range (10 Mils/Rev)
    28.4 ounces, 12.5” long,
    28 ounces is getting too far out there. Thanks for the March recommendation. This one would also fit:
    D24V42FIMAN (MOA, Normal, Illumi)

    Fwiw, adjustment range is a non issue, and neither is FFP or SFP. Exposed, capped or locking turrets are all good as well.
     
    Looking for a scope for a particular use case. These are the features I need:
    Side parallax
    Low magnification no higher than 3x
    High magnification no lower than 10x
    Objective no smaller than 36mm
    Weight no more than 22 oz
    Length no longer than 13"
    Glass quality as high as possible
    Is this for a points game or otherwise?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: StephenShivers
    Is this for a points game or otherwise?
    No, its for hunting thick areas with a .300 BLK on a lightweight suppressed SBR that also enjoys some clip on use (hence the length restriction due to rail space). I've been running the Razor HD LH 1.5-8x32 for years on this setup and its been deadly. Ran across a scenario yesterday evening at low light that was frustrating. I had a buck in multiple layers of thick stuff that I had a clear broadside shot on, however I could not determine if it was an 8 point that I had been seeing that I didn't want to shoot, or a 10 point as it was so thick.

    Side parallax would have been able to cut through the brush and focus directly on the antlers. Lack of light was not yet the issue, but it was getting dark quick. A larger objective than 32mm would be welcome since we are making the change anyway and a bit more reach than the 8x top end especially as my eyes continue to age. The bottom end mag requirement is to maintain a decent FOV as things move quickly where I hunt. Weight requirement for obvious reasons. SFP is perfectly fine for this cartridge, probably preferred unless someone has a really usable FFP that fits the bill.

    Added chart to first post. Will update as this goes along.
     
    Last edited:
    No, its for hunting thick areas with a .300 BLK on a lightweight suppressed SBR that also enjoys some clip on use (hence the length restriction due to rail space).
    Until you check these out, don't laugh and remember if you can quarter the target w/the ret you have enough power. For straight-up killing I dumped everything USO, Leupold, Bushnell, ect and now only run Hawke 14211's or 14225's. They work great w/clip on's as well.
     
    Until you check these out, don't laugh and remember if you can quarter the target w/the ret you have enough power. For straight-up killing I dumped everything USO, Leupold, Bushnell, ect and now only run Hawke 14211's or 14225's. They work great w/clip on's as well.
    I have never in my life looked at Hawke. I mainly attempt to avoid buying Ch-Ch-China. Browsing their webpage though, these two options are extremely interesting from a feature set standpoint: