Re: HK 416/17 and MR556A1
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: chainring</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: YourMotherTrebek</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Ram4X4</div><div class="ubbcode-body">There is nothing special about HK except its made by Nazis. The only HK product I will own, is the USP pistol. Preferably at a used price. Everything else is overrated, over priced, and full of unicorn shit. Plenty of American piston ARs work just as good or better than HK and cost less. LMT, LWRC, POF, hell Ruger has one now, its only a matter of time until Armalite and DPMS offers one. Bushmaster has one too I think, and the ACR which is a XM8 that works. CMMG makes a damn good one for the price. CMMG has some of the best machining on the market. And they are dirt cheap. And sell tactical bacon in a can. Cant beat that. Does HK have tactical bacon in a can? No. Enough said. </div></div>
Now here's some real ignorant comments by someone that probably has never even handled a 416.
"Plenty of American piston ARs work just as good or better than HK and cost less"
you sir are a tool
As was stated above it has the finest fit and finish of any AR15 I've owned, handled, fired or groped.
So just for shits and giggles here's my list.
1.416
2.Daniel Defense
3.Colt
4.LMT </div></div>
Tactful, as always. HK doesn't give a crap about the American Civilian market, and their firearms are overpriced by hype and ignorance. That doesn't mean they aren't decent machines, it just means that I'm not gonna spend money on 'em. LWRCI, Glock 34, and Remington 870 are sufficient for my needs. It's kinda like Harley's. I worked for my Dad and saved up to buy my first Sportster when I was 15 (yeah, had to stick to the backroads briefly until I got my DL
) and moved through several Superglides, a Fat Boy, and a Road King. Finally sold out and bought a Suzuki DL1000 because I got tired of seeing all the accountants and bankers putting on their bandanas and sleeveless shirts on the weekend and shape-shifting into "bikers" on their Harleys! I like the machine, but the image and hype and associated cost are irritating. After having a Suzuki "adventure bike" for a few years it's obvious to me that it's a better bang for my buck than Harley was. Kinda like Glock, LWRCI, and Remington 870 are when compared to HK and Benelli!
</div></div>
It's all Kool-Aid; baby, You just chose another flavor.
I fail to see where you are going with your "biker" analogy. Other than "we all could get by with less" idea, it is not a parallel.
We all don't need Schmidt & Bender optics, but i'll be damned if i'm going to give them up for a Super Sniper just cause it's the best "bang for my buck".