Re: HK 45C questons
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RockSteady</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The new hk45 and hk45c have great egros. I've had a hk45 before and it fits very well. The only drawback from the hk45 vs the 1911 is the trigger. I shoot the 1911 because of the excellent triggers you can get in them. I believe you will find the hk trigger too soft and mushy.
Goodluck! </div></div>
You are 100% correct about the triggers. You just can’t beat a 1911. Just yesterday I was shooting a nice Kimber 1911, a STI 1911 (very nice), a H&K USP45 Tactical and a HK45c. H&K does a god job with there triggers but because of the basic design they will never be as good as the 1911’s. That being said for a “defense” gun the H&K triggers are PLENTY good. The 45 Tactical’s “Match” trigger is 90% of what one of the good 1911 triggers is.
If I were using it for a competition gun there is no doubt that I would rather have a 1911. The main advantage being the trigger. But when it comes to a defense or tactical situation the H&K triggers are more than good enough to put rounds on target effectively. The SOCOM guys seem to like them. I heard the SEALS are now carrying the HK45c.
All of this needs to be taken with a grain of salt though. It’s hard to buy a “bad” gun these days. When it comes to defense pistols there are so many good options I think it comes down more to what fits in your hands better (which will let you shoot better) than any “features” a specific brand may have.
Obviously I’m a H&K dork but after that I like the S&W M&P’s, then the Glocks, then the Springfield XD’s and then the Sig’s. But you can’t go wrong with any of them. I suggest shooting them all, see what works best ergonomically for you and get one chambered in something that starts with a “4”. No matter what you go with if you can’t eliminate the threat, it’s not the guns fault.
Good luck!