• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

How republicans are not offending gun owners while banning Semi Autos

Passing a decree is one thing.... enacting it is another.

They know full well what will happen if they try to ban semi automatic guns.

Frankly, so long as the dems can ignore immigration laws.... we can ignore gun laws.... personally we have the authority to ignore gun laws regardless, as they are all unconstitutional, but i digress
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuneBoer
IMG_0542.JPG
 
Well if the Republicans are stupid enough to do that, pretty much we can feel free to vote them all out of office & vote in Democrats for a couple cycles to fully flush them out (since Guns are about the only thing that keeps a lot of us voting republican), and then eventually maybe let them get back in once the ones currently in power are retired & some new ones are actually willing to do as they promised us to get in and stay in.

It seems the Republicans have all but forgotten how Clinton's AWB brought them control of the house & senate after near 40 years in the wilderness.... I'm sure the Democrats and the news media will be happy to feed them BS "Public Opinion" crap stories and polls to get them to anger their only primary supporting base & watch them all get kicked out.
 
Passing a decree is one thing.... enacting it is another.

They know full well what will happen if they try to ban semi automatic guns.

Frankly, so long as the dems can ignore immigration laws.... we can ignore gun laws.... personally we have the authority to ignore gun laws regardless, as they are all unconstitutional, but i digress


Not according to the Supreme court. The reality is, 2A protections are very narrow, many folks think otherwise like you but are wrong.
 
Not according to the Supreme court. The reality is, 2A protections are very narrow, many folks think otherwise like you but are wrong.
not according to the govt you mean?

the simple answer is....the SC is wrong.......the constitution is clear as day......and my right to own weapons is a god given right.......i do not need authority from man to exercise it.....nor does man have authority to restrict it.

the govt can bawk all it wants.....but "shall not be infringed" is pretty fucking iron clad.....and any "interpretation" to the contrary is wrong.
 
You won't do anything because at your core you are a coward.
Come out of your mom's basement and say that . You really are that little seaky weasel kid from class that would goad and fuck with the normal bigger kids to get them to kick your ass so they would get in trouble . Honestly , where is the payoff in being such a weasel pussy . I never got it and guess I never will . Oh well carry on Weasel .
 
not according to the govt you mean?

the simple answer is....the SC is wrong.......the constitution is clear as day......and my right to own weapons is a god given right.......i do not need authority from man to exercise it.....nor does man have authority to restrict it.

the govt can bawk all it wants.....but "shall not be infringed" is pretty fucking iron clad.....and any "interpretation" to the contrary is wrong.

I don’t disagree with you, but the pragmatic side of me realizes our reality doesn’t mesh with that.

The SC has decided what the 2A means, our only recourse is with in the state legislature. If we get 51% of the states to back 2A then that in effect becomes the law of the land thereby circumventing the SC.
 
Can We get the retard fish person back, he was definitely more entertaining than our current village idiot. ....

Jerry,
U need help in Conroe with "stuff", we'll give u a bigger response than we did with Strykervet..
 
This is my take on it..........................

“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.”
― Robert A. Heinlein