Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My March 4.5-28x52 is 31.1 oz, 33.1 oz with sun shade.Not the current gen. I believe it’s over 31oz.
If it's similar to the 6-36 won't it stand out based on FOV, eyebox, and easy to use controls?Then they should make this scope stand out from the crowd it's joining into. The easiest way would be it's weight class. The razor HD LHT 4.5-21 is 21oz, pretty decent glass, but turrets lack majorly, and they have zero retention issues. This scope will likely rectify those issue, but at a smaller objective(44mm correct?) and 11oz weight penalty. I guess I'm just disappointed hoping this scope was going to be something that vortex never planned it to turn out as.
The fov on a 6-36 isn't any better than tangent 35X or NF 35X. I don't expect the eyebox to be great on a 12.5" long 6x erector 4-24, physics will not be in its favor. I don't think the gen3 has any easy to use controls that set it apart, do you? The turret locks sucked for the first year, plus the zeroing system is as out of norm as you can get.If it's similar to the 6-36 won't it stand out based on FOV, eyebox, and easy to use controls?
The fov on a 6-36 isn't any better than tangent 35X or NF 35X. I don't expect the eyebox to be great on a 12.5" long 6x erector 4-24, physics will not be in its favor. I don't think the gen3 has any easy to use controls that set it apart, do you? The turret locks sucked for the first year, plus the zeroing system is as out of norm as you can get.
I have 4 of the 6-36 gen3s. They're a good scope, I also have the $1300 delta 3.5-21 which is most likely the bones of this new vortex, as it's low japan made. I'll likely get this new gen3 4-24 and run it through it's paces, if it's not $1k better in my eyes over the Delta, it'll get passed onto someone else.
Most folks don't realize it is much easier to loose an ounce or 2 in their gut then trying to squeeze an extra ounce out of their rifle system. Just food for thought.Pretty sure 31 ounces was the weight being talked about in this thread so 32 is not some huge difference. It’s 1 ounce. lol It’s still a good weight at 32 ounces for what most all will use it for. Let’s not get all worked up over an ounce. lol
I think the R3's AFOV is only one degree better than the NF but is 2 degrees better than the TT. For whatever that's worth being a 5-10% difference.The fov on a 6-36 isn't any better than tangent 35X or NF 35X.
I think I'm a bit biased since I'm comparing my R3 to my NF 7-35. The magnification doesn't turn the whole eyepiece, the illumination isn't push button, and the zero-stop system is considerably more idiotproof/easy to use.I don't think the gen3 has any easy to use controls that set it apart, do you?
I REALLY like the R3 zeroing system though so I guess we just differ there. In fairness it doesn't help that my NF's zero-stop is non-functional right now since it came (new in box) with galling in the internal threads that prevent the clutch from rotating all the way down. I'm sending it to NF for repair after an important hunt I want to use the NF for in a few weeks.plus the zeroing system is as out of norm as you can get.
My theory (and not pointing fingers at anyone specific) is deeeep down, some folks want an excuse to not buy X gear for some combo of:Most folks don't realize it is much easier to loose an ounce or 2 in their gut then trying to squeeze an extra ounce out of their rifle system. Just food for thought.
Most folks don't realize it is much easier to loose an ounce or 2 in their gut then trying to squeeze an extra ounce out of their rifle system. Just food for thought.
Sprung vs unsprung mass?So if I lost 5 pounds from my fat ass i could just carry a 15# rifle around the mountains and it would feel like my 10# rifles do now?
Truth!The psychological diagnosis’ that pop up on here are very interesting.
I’ve used AI to provide me a psychological analysis on myself and a few other members of the this site. LolThe psychological diagnosis’ that pop up on here are very interesting.
There are spec sheets floating around in the wild, I saw one yesterday. Everything already posted in this thread is pretty spot on. 32oz, 31' - 5ish' FOV at 100 yards, same xmas tree reticle.maybe we should all just wait to see the actual specifications (and verify them) before we get our pant!es in a twist.
I just want a nice optic for a gas gun. I was looking at the Steiner T6xi 3-18 and NF 4-16x42 but might wait a bit and throw some more money at one of these (after I wait and see what the actual street price and true specs are). I'd prefer it to be a 3x on the bottom end (or even a 2.5 if I'm being honest) but can probably figure out a way to make the 4-24 work.
Yeah, after this one I'd love to see a G3 in the 3-18X range.maybe we should all just wait to see the actual specifications (and verify them) before we get our pant!es in a twist.
I just want a nice optic for a gas gun. I was looking at the Steiner T6xi 3-18 and NF 4-16x42 but might wait a bit and throw some more money at one of these (after I wait and see what the actual street price and true specs are). I'd prefer it to be a 3x on the bottom end (or even a 2.5 if I'm being honest) but can probably figure out a way to make the 4-24 work.