• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

I think I'm making some progress now, finally (rabbit hole revisited)

scudzuki

Gunny Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 1, 2012
2,100
155
59
Philadelphia suburbs
Some of you may have read my post a week ago about the direction I've gone in order to reload more consistent ammunition.
To paraphrase, I have a very accurate digital balance that weighs down to the individual kernel of extruded rifle powders.
I am using Lapua .260 brass (once fired then neck resized as of now) and BR-2 primers and Nosler 140 gr. custom comps.
I am checking concentricity of the loaded bullets, and despite the warnings of at least one Hider, I am straightening any that have more than .002" runout at the ogive.
About half of the rounds are better than .002" out of the bullet seater and require no tweaking.

Due to the unavailability of H4340, I switched to AA4350, and ran an OCW last week, arriving at 41.9 grains as the middle of a node.
Being as AA4350 book data shows charges about a grain lower than H4350, this comes as no surprise; in fact, based on the ballistics (I did not chrono today) 41.9 gr A4350 is about the same as 42.7 gr H4350, which shoots well out of probably 80% of the .260s out there.

I bought the last Coax press Midway had in stock (! arriving Wednesday) and plan to switch to neck sizing/FL sizing dies with bushings and no expander ball if I can't get more concentric ammo out of my current tools; my research suggests that seating the bullet does not induce runout, that any runout in the loaded round was already present in the case, and the bullet pretty much follows the neck.

I shot at 100 and 400 yards today and got some mixed results.
One 5 shot group at 100 yards is the tightest I've ever shot, and 2 others were spoiled by "fliers".
Those results followed out to 400 yards, with most of the shots grouping tightly but the groups ultimately spoiled by an errant round (or 2).
If I could go back in time, I would mark the rounds I had to correct, and hopefully I would find a correlation there.

If I could ignore the fliers (which I can't) 2 of the groups at 400 would be astoundingly good (for me and my ability).
Note that regardless of my skill level, I know when I'm shooting well and when I screw up a shot, and I wasn't doing that today. The wind was 1 MPH or less the entire time I was there, in other words, perfect conditions.

Joe
 

Attachments

  • 100yds.jpg
    100yds.jpg
    85.9 KB · Views: 19
  • 400yds-1.jpg
    400yds-1.jpg
    98.1 KB · Views: 13
  • 400yds-2.jpg
    400yds-2.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 11
  • 400yds-3.jpg
    400yds-3.jpg
    94.9 KB · Views: 12
It's a stick I put together myself.
Stainless SA Remington 700 action, Brux 24" M40 profile 1:8.5 twist fluted barrel with a Little Jimmy brake on a McRees folder, pinned rail (screws opened up to #8-40) with a Steiner 5-25x56 MSR in a Spuhr 13 mil mount.
It had an XRS on it when I took this picture.

With the weight of this rifle and the brake, there's so little recoil... I could shoot this thing all day.

Joe
 

Attachments

  • 260-2.jpg
    260-2.jpg
    102.7 KB · Views: 19
What is your goal?

Bench Rifle?
Tactical Competition Rifle?

If you intend on competing in tactical rifle type competitions, consistent 3/4moa rifle will be entirely adequate. The reason I'm asking is every round downrange doing load development is life off the barrel, you could be shooting comps or practicing for comps. Find a load that shoots "good enough" and start working on developing the "software".
 
It's a stick I put together myself.
Stainless SA Remington 700 action, Brux 24" M40 profile 1:8.5 twist fluted barrel with a Little Jimmy brake on a McRees folder, pinned rail (screws opened up to #8-40) with a Steiner 5-25x56 MSR in a Spuhr 13 mil mount.
It had an XRS on it when I took this picture.

With the weight of this rifle and the brake, there's so little recoil... I could shoot this thing all day.

Joe

Joe,
Great looking DIY rig and a great shooter. You did it right.
Nice to have paper for reference down the road. I'm with you man. Punch that paper...all day long!!!!
 
What is your goal?

Bench Rifle?
Tactical Competition Rifle?

If you intend on competing in tactical rifle type competitions, consistent 3/4moa rifle will be entirely adequate. The reason I'm asking is every round downrange doing load development is life off the barrel, you could be shooting comps or practicing for comps. Find a load that shoots "good enough" and start working on developing the "software".

Oh man do I have to have a goal?
I just like shooting, want the best accuracy I can achieve, and want to understand why it is so... pretty much the way I go with all my hobbies.
Haven't thought about the end, I'm all about the means.
I understand I'm wearing out the barrel, I figure I can just spin another one on.
I like all aspects of it; building, reloading, shooting.

Joe
 
Last edited: