Re: Is it worth it?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: XTR</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: arborpro</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I probably couldn't hold a candle to many of the shooters here. But i've never seen a weatherby in competition in either high-power, or long range tactical. your gonna find out your going to spend more and wait longer than you think to accurize your rifle why not go with a time proven platform. or just buy a howa barreled action. </div></div>
Big difference between a Howa/Vanguard action and a MkV. <span style="font-weight: bold">This one is the 9 lug 60 degree bolt.</span>
I've always liked them, usually beautiful if nothing else, and as stated above, the 270 is a fine hunting round. Is it a 270 win or a 270 wby? If I recall correctly the 27Weatherby was Roy Weatherby's first Weatherby magnum round.
Take it out and shoot it. It might shoot well. If you start reloading for it I've read that stock Wby barrels tend to have very long throats. just a data point to know in advance.</div></div>
What I bolded is the problem with dumping a bunch of money into these. It costs a lot more to get the same job done as a Rem 700, Sav 10 or a post 64 Win 70. If you want to hunt with it, leave it as is. If you want it for a long range rifle, then I suggest selling it for the money for the parts to build a dedicated long range rifle.
As far as old vs. new Weatherby, I would take the new. It's all built on CNC machines now that can hold very tight tolerances. As compared to the old which were built on manual machines and didn't hold the tolerances the machining world is capable of today. I have a gunsmith friend who cringed every time someone came in wanting a Weatherby action trued up. He found that usually only about 4-6 lugs touch and of those 2-3 fit face to face all the way. They have gotten better IMO now.
But going back to the original issue, this design was only meant to hold 1.5" @ 100 yds. The rifle design really does do that well. Again, IMO, I don't think it lends itself well to long range precision. With rather obvious caveat. That is the bolt rides in the action the same diameter at that. While Savages, Howas, Mausers and even Remingtons and Winchesters feel loose in comparision this really doesn't do anything more than align the bolt with the cartridge and bore on loading. As long as the cartridge isn't being damaged during loading, this doesn't make a whole lot of difference. Being held true during firing though, I think makes a difference. A slight one, but noticeable. At least from what I've seen from the other actions that do that.