Is Uber Discriminating Against Men?

[Longshot231]

Just came across this video this morning.



This must be the assault he talks about in the video.



Of course we know that a woman would never do anything wrong. Right?



I haven't been able to research everything but the article below is about Uber's former HR chief who, according to the article, "for releasing the company’s first diversity report and ushering in equal pay for all employees."

She was only with the company for a year and a half. I don't know anything about the current CEO or HR chief.

Uber's chief human resources officer abruptly steps down

Uber's chief human resources officer has abruptly stepped down. Liane Hornsey told employees in an email Wednesday that she is leaving the company but gave no reason.

apnews.com

Uber wasn't new to complaints of sexual harassments. Then again, what large corporation isn't a target of sexual harassment complaints? Just think of the "deep pockets" theory.

Uber Lawsuit Exposes Corporate Retaliation against Victims - Downtown LA Law Group

Uber Lawsuit Exposes Corporate Retaliation against Victims The Ultimate Guide to Uber AccidentsSudden Stop Rideshare AccidentRideshare Injury Accident when Leaving Vehicle

downtownlalaw.com

Bonus video: Not to be outdone, Lyft gets its time in the spotlight. This woman didn't need a car to transport her. She needed a livestock truck.

 

[MK20]

In her defense she probably thought Lyft meant they showed up with a Tommy Gate so they could pick her up.

 

[Smokeshot]

Except for conservative businesses, who doesn’t discriminate against men these days?! lol

It’s trendy to be an atheist man-hating tranny fag baby killing purple haired lesbian dog spirited disgustingly obese cunt.

 

[Holliday]

Time for some lawsuits.

“The Supreme Court's recent decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services (2025) eliminated a heightened standard for "reverse discrimination" claims, ruling that employees must provide the same proof as any other discrimination claim, not requiring "background circumstances" to show a pattern against the majority. This unanimous decision simplifies the ability of majority-group plaintiffs to bring discrimination cases under Title VII, aligning with recent guidance from the EEOC and raising concerns for employers about potential increases in these lawsuits. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Case Background

• Plaintiff: Marlean Ames, a heterosexual woman, was passed over for a promotion and demoted by her employer, the Ohio Department of Youth Services. [2, 6]
• Allegation: Ames claimed the decisions were discriminatory based on her sexual orientation, as the positions were given to LGBTQ individuals. [2, 7]
• Lower Court Ruling: Both the trial court and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed her case because, as a member of a majority group, she failed to provide "background circumstances" indicating a pattern of discrimination against majority group members. [1, 2]

Supreme Court's Decision

• Unanimous Ruling: The Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Sixth Circuit's decision. [1, 2]
• No Higher Standard: The Court held that plaintiffs claiming reverse discrimination do not need to satisfy an enhanced evidentiary standard, such as the "background circumstances" requirement previously imposed by some circuit courts. [1, 3]
• Equal Proof Standard: Majority-group plaintiffs only need to follow the same proof requirements as claimants of traditional discrimination. [1]

Implications of the Ruling

• Easier to Sue: The decision makes it easier for majority-group employees to proceed with discrimination claims beyond the initial stages of a lawsuit. [1, 5]
• Impact on Circuits: This ruling will primarily affect the Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth, and District of Columbia Circuits, which previously had the "background circumstances" rule. [5, 8]
• Employer Action: Employers should review employment decisions, ensure they are supported by legitimate business reasons, provide clear documentation, and offer training to HR personnel and managers on the new legal parameters. [4, 9]
• DEI Programs: The ruling comes after a period of increased scrutiny of DEI programs following the Supreme Court's 2023 affirmative action decision, suggesting potential implications for future DEI initiatives. [10]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://www.honigman.com/alert-3005[2] https://www.huschblackwell.com/news...standard-for-reverse-discrimination-claims[3] https://natlawreview.com/article/scotus-makes-final-decision-reverse-discrimination-standard[4] https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insig...s-standard-in-reverse-discrimination-cases[5] https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/p...olds-no-higher-standard-for-majority-group[6] https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...reme-court-reverse-discrimination-lawsuit/[8] https://www.quarles.com/newsroom/pu...verse-discrimination-suits-under-title-vii[9] https://wyattfirm.com/the-u-s-supre...se-and-its-potential-impact-on-employers/[10]

 

[Holliday]

Except for conservative businesses, who doesn’t discriminate against men these days?! lol

It’s trendy to be an atheist man-hating tranny fag baby killing purple haired lesbian dog spirited disgustingly obese cunt.

Keep laughing.

SIMPs always do.

Simps are killing this country.

 

[Smokeshot]

Keep laughing.

SIMPs always do.

Simps are killing this country.



View attachment 8754566

How is my response “simping”?

 

[Holliday]

Today’s SIMP video, created by a (so called) man. Likely with his balls kept in a mason jar under the kitchen sink.

Our culture everyday is being programed by laughing SIMPS.

 

[Smokeshot]

Develop your reading comprehension skills. The emoji implies that the state of discrimination against men is a joke.

Miserbale “men” who lack mental capacity to understand simple stuff are also one of the reasons for downfall of this society.

 

[Longshot231]

Develop your reading comprehension skills. The emoji implies that the state of discrimination against men is a joke.

Miserbale “men” who lack mental capacity to understand simple stuff are also one of the reasons for downfall of this society.

It's not only miserable men that are the reasons for the downfall of society. It's the miserable women.

IMHO, they out number the number of men that are reasonable.

Everything done in the name of reform are but mere Band-Aids on a severed limb.

A step in the right direction would be to repeal the 19th amendment, stop women from voting and holding any sort of public office.

That will probably never happen in my lifetime unless the muslims take over. Then everyone will feel misery.