So how exactly do you propose they unfuck it after their two year witch Hunt?
Does the onset of impeachment proceedings against President Trump sound viable?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!
Join contest SubscribeSo how exactly do you propose they unfuck it after their two year witch Hunt?
Impeachment? Probably better than 50:50. Conviction in the Senate? Not likely at all.Does the onset of impeachment proceedings against President Trump sound viable?
Does the onset of impeachment proceedings against President Trump sound viable?
Does the onset of impeachment proceedings against President Trump sound viable?
You dolt, Trump didn't fuck his presidency, it was Hillary and Obama conspiring with Comey and Brennan to prop up lies about Trump's campaign so they can start an investigation.Does the onset of impeachment proceedings against President Trump sound viable?
You dolt, Trump didn't fuck his presidency, it was Hillary and Obama conspiring with Comey and Brennan to prop up lies about Trump's campaign so they can start an investigation.
Those idiots need to give Trump 2.5 years back and probably undo the mid-term election because it was clearly improperly influenced by false accusations against the Trump administration.
This is the biggest scandal in US history and the only innocent parties are Donald Trump, members of his campaign and administration and some recent appointees.
The point is the situation can't be unfucked and the people responsible need to pay.
I don't think Obama can be impeached because he's not in office but he can be indited. Same with Hillary and a bunch of other people who should be rounded up, tried and shot.
According to my friends from NC and GA, my overall disposition is as if I may "be one of them gubmint skeptical boys from pretty deep in the woods."Do you identify as a Wyomingite?
A reporter retorted to Barr at the press conference this morning (before Barr stormed out of the conference): "The president is fund-raising you're comments about spying."
Gonna be sipping a drinkie at a local 6am watering hole after my shift
You'd be surprised how many folk populate the bar at 6-7am
Said watering hole just so happens to be directly across the street from the Republican Party HQ in my jurisdiction.
They do exist in Los Angeles County
'Murica
I used to have bacon and eggs with my breakfast beer, when I worked 3rd shift..............
The libs will twist any report to their liking. facts be damned.
Does the onset of impeachment proceedings against President Trump sound viable?
"Legal experts 'flabbergasted' by AG Barr's 'deliberate political performance' he's 'too far into the tank' for Trump."
LEGOWIwho are the legal "experts",,, names please? or STFU and carry out your promise.
He already did.... And left.
I have to say I am in agreement with you. If the law does not make them pay, then maybe the peeps will. The law is meaningless. As sick as it sounds if some nutbag decides to go ballistic on these Dem effers? I think I may cheer. If they need not follow the law? Than why should we.i gotta say,,, i hope they march up to the white house and cuff him and eject him via impeachment,,, i really really want that to happen.
I'm not wasting time on it. I've spent enough time the last year or more looking into this to know exactly what the report is.Show of hands....how many anywhere have (or are) reading the actual report now that it is available? I'm weird that way...I try not to make up my mind about what something says until I actually read it as I trust no on e to "interpret" what another has written for me to "understand". Like folks who "clarify" or "interpret" the 2nd Amendment for me.
So how many of US here on The Hide are actually reading and digesting the report?
VooDoo
I have, can you give me your summation of the important parts/points?Show of hands....how many anywhere have (or are) reading the actual report now that it is available? I'm weird that way...I try not to make up my mind about what something says until I actually read it as I trust no on e to "interpret" what another has written for me to "understand". Like folks who "clarify" or "interpret" the 2nd Amendment for me.
So how many of US here on The Hide are actually reading and digesting the report?
VooDoo
"Apres moi le deluge"
Did Putin or one of his henchmen abruptly cut the TV feed link to the U.S., from news reporter Ryan Chilkote's report on the Mueller Investigation from Moscow last night??? - April 18, 2019.
The feed link cut sure looks suspicious too me...
No telling what Putin and his henchmen are up to next.
Thoughts???
Interview starts at 46:00 & and the link failure at 53:00
Show of hands....how many anywhere have (or are) reading the actual report now that it is available? I'm weird that way...I try not to make up my mind about what something says until I actually read it as I trust no on e to "interpret" what another has written for me to "understand". Like folks who "clarify" or "interpret" the 2nd Amendment for me.
So how many of US here on The Hide are actually reading and digesting the report?
VooDoo
Here is the thing, how do you know the report out there is legit? It’s pretty obvious you cannot trust those in power, so why have confidence that this is true?
If it were false, one side or the other would be pissed off and making a big stink about it.Here is the thing, how do you know the report out there is legit? It’s pretty obvious you cannot trust those in power, so why have confidence that this is true?
Now that's puttin' on some spin...?
If it were false, one side or the other would be pissed off and making a big stink about it.
The Dems are making a big stink because that's what they do but they haven't been saying it's fake and Muller hasn't said a peep about it.
That's enough for me to accept that it's the genuine report but it was written by Muller so everything has to be taken with a mouth full of salt.
I have, can you give me your summation of the important parts/points?
R
So in layman's terms they(lawyers) purposefully made it to be unclear and to be usedAlmost 200 pages of edited twisting and turning with delicate details thoughtfully omitted. My IQ is only 130.....I am having a lot of trouble drawing any solid conclusion from any of it. I'll keep reading and probably read it a couple times. But I can already tell that it is deliberately nebulous and convoluted and that it seems to have been purposely concocted and assembled to distort things beyond a simple summation.
The whole thing/concept is literally a fantastic example of Nonlinear/Hybrid Warfare.
My conclusion is that the whole report is extremely well calculated and deployed Nonlinear Warfare. A masterpiece, actually.
VooDoo