• Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    Drop it in the replies for the chance to win a free shirt!

    Join the contest

It's Out ...

COD piece?
tumblr_inline_nfmkadeQeV1rq29x2.jpg
 
I'd say 2 good reasons.

In your armor, it's so that the raging erection you get in battle doesn't cramp your style, when you are wearing pants of steel you need pre made room for that.

It was all the vanity rage at the time making you look like you had a big package to get the ladies talking & also show off to the other guys. The Church used to take a dim view of them and say they were sinful, but couldn't do too much about them till they fell out of fashion.
 
I try not to be cynical,,,but.... It seems whenever there is an investigation in Washington about some terrible wrongdoing...it ends up being nothing more a bunch of thieves accusing thieves of stealing. I do hope something of substance comes out of this back alley crap.
 
Everyone seems to be missing a couple big points about the whole Trump Russia investigation.

1) To appoint a special prosecutor there must be evidence of a crime (I have seen no evidence thus far of any Trump Crimes).

2) It is illegal for the FBI to investigate anything the IG is already investigating (no Parallel Investigations).

3) The same is not true for Mueller he can investigate anything pursuant to his appointment.

4) Mueller is authorized to investigate any ties between Trump Russia or anywhere that leads (it leads to FusionGPS, Hillary, DNC and Obama).

Mueller is not a leaker. Any and all leaks are mis-directions and or Canary traps/Barium Meals. JMHO
 


Really? I mean... The fucking logic here is ridiculous. This is the politically correct equivalent of planting a fake gun you carry around on a corpse after you made a bad shoot.

Carter Page is your throwaway gun...


ETA: Holy shit, the board software unrolls the first twat... That's sophisticated as hell.
 
With the unanimous approval to release perhaps it is such thin gruel that in its shallowness it's basically confirming the first memo.

Yes, but no doubt all the little Olivers are going to lap it up and say that it tastes like Free Trade vegan douchenozzle-quinoa salad.

 
The FBI also intentionally failed to follow Woods procedures (i.e., verification of every fact used to support a FISA application).

The Bureau reeks from top to bottom.

It's a grand mess to sort out, and I am not sure it ever will be. As for thumbing it's nose at the Wood's rule it is possible that quite a few people failed. And by "fail" I mean something else. The volume of people involved, or that should have been involved, is large.

http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...ses-question-did-fbi-violate-woods-procedures
 
According to gateway pundit Flynn’s lawyers are preparing a motion to drop charges. Sounds possible.

vyBmbz2.jpg


At this point I don't want anything dropped. I want everyone to double down and charge forward until they can charge no more. I do not want mangled bodies secreted away from the political battlefield under cover of darkness and claims of state secrets, I want an autopsy under stadium lights with the bleachers of democracy filled to the brim. It may be the only way we ever find out what has taken place. The cynic in me says this will not happen.

The Dems incessant and melodramatic Grim Reaping over the release of anything classified related to this investigation is such a stark departure from their usual MO that it has me transfixed. Pelosi and Schiff have painted faces of death chewing away the fabric of democracy on anyone who even suggests that the people have an interest, much less a right, in knowing what is going on. Then yesterday the NYT reverses gears and demands the court release the documents:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/us/politics/new-york-times-carter-page-documents-request-unseal.html?rref=collection/timestopic/Classified Information and State Secrets&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=collection

The New York Times is asking the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to unseal secret documents related to the wiretapping of Carter Page, the onetime Trump campaign adviser at the center of a disputed memo written by Republican staffers on the House Intelligence Committee.

The motion is unusual. No such wiretapping application materials apparently have become public since Congress first enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in 1978. That law regulates electronic spying on domestic soil — the interception of phone calls and emails — undertaken in the name of monitoring suspected spies and terrorists, as opposed to wiretapping for investigating ordinary criminal suspects.

In musing over the timeless question of whether any nation suffers more from undue secrecy or from undue disclosure, history strongly answers it is the latter.
 
It's a grand mess to sort out, and I am not sure it ever will be. As for thumbing it's nose at the Wood's rule it is possible that quite a few people failed. And by "fail" I mean something else. The volume of people involved, or that should have been involved, is large.

http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...ses-question-did-fbi-violate-woods-procedures


I think the Gop Memo set a trap for the Dems in the release their memo. I have not quite figured it out yet but that is likely good. because the Dems it appear have not either.

You posting that article just convinces me Mueller is on the Truth team which is also the Trump Team.
 
I think the Gop Memo set a trap for the Dems in the release their memo. I have not quite figured it out yet but that is likely good. because the Dems it appear have not either.

You posting that article just convinces me Mueller is on the Truth team which is also the Trump Team.
You have much more faith in Mueller than I do.
He was chosen to be "the" guy for very specific reasons from my experience.

R