Magpul PRS vs. Luth-Ar
- Thread starter BigPineyTradingPost
- Start date
Same adjust-ability from what I can see. Luth-AR, the only thing I have about it (not sure if it's the same for PRS) but the cheek riser can flex a decent bit (worse the taller it is).
PRS is way more solid, especially when talking about the comb. Ive never messed with the buttpad height, but Im almost certain Ive saw it adjusted in pics before.
Seems like the Luth-ar only has two settings for cheek weld. Normal placement and high. This could very well be me not knowing how to adjust it. Mostly likely the case.
The LuthAR is very bouncy to me
The Magpul has much better feel to it and balances out our heavier, longer barreled rifles better
The only issue is the Gen 3 has a much longer LOP so it's a touch too long for some folks.
To me, the LuthAR is an entry-level, factory stock and not an upgrade option.
The Magpul has much better feel to it and balances out our heavier, longer barreled rifles better
The only issue is the Gen 3 has a much longer LOP so it's a touch too long for some folks.
To me, the LuthAR is an entry-level, factory stock and not an upgrade option.
I don't have any direct experience with the PRS other than handling one (not shooting) but I used a Luth-AR MBA-3 carbine stock for a bit and didn't much care for it all that much. The adjustments felt a little clunky to me and I just didn't ever get to where it felt really good.
Own and have used both,
The PRS to me is a much better option.
I have a Luth AR MBA 1 on my AR10 (the fixed stock version) and it’s decent. I have the MBA 3 on my 260 bolt gun (Ashbury chassis) and don’t care for it at all.
Magpul PRS all the way for a Precision rifle especially where weight etc isn’t an issue. I like my fixed MBA1 but will most likely part with the adjustable carbine model MBA 3 in the future
I think lowlight said it best above. My 260 also has a folding adapter so I have no use for the LOP adjustable mba3 as the length is already long enough
The PRS to me is a much better option.
I have a Luth AR MBA 1 on my AR10 (the fixed stock version) and it’s decent. I have the MBA 3 on my 260 bolt gun (Ashbury chassis) and don’t care for it at all.
Magpul PRS all the way for a Precision rifle especially where weight etc isn’t an issue. I like my fixed MBA1 but will most likely part with the adjustable carbine model MBA 3 in the future
I think lowlight said it best above. My 260 also has a folding adapter so I have no use for the LOP adjustable mba3 as the length is already long enough
I'm a huge fan of the Gen 3 PRS. It's rock solid on my Mega setup. If I were going to go with something other than the PRS, it would likely be an XLR stock.
The LMT DMR stock puts them both to shame. Even more comfy/solid than the PRS and it also rides on a 6 position buffer tube so you can go shorter with the LOP unlike the PRS.
The LUTH-AR is a cheap POS. They may work fine for the occasional range blaster but put some rounds through a rifle with one and you’ll be tightening it up all the time.
The LUTH-AR is a cheap POS. They may work fine for the occasional range blaster but put some rounds through a rifle with one and you’ll be tightening it up all the time.
Similar threads
Accessories
Magpul PRS Gen 3
