• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

MicroBest Chrome BCG - Pictures and Comparison

Cascade Hemi

Old Salt
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Feb 9, 2019
    3,396
    3,760
    PNW
    This is only pictures and a comparison. There are tons of durability reviews if you do a search.

    MicroBest is the OEM for many big name manufacturers. BCM, SOLGW, etc. They offer a bunch of configurations in a handful of finishes. This is the all chrome, C158 variant. It also comes in Phosphate and Nitride. The chrome option is available with different material extractors and gas keys as well as unique fasteners and Sprinco springs. These carriers run anywhere from $90 in phosphate up to $165+ in chrome with different options.

    This is the base MicroBest chrome finish with C158 bolt BCG and I planned on installing Sprinco extractor spring and gas rings. When I took it apart I found a 5 coil CS spring and heavy gas rings. I believe they are Sprinco but the BCG was not listed as containing such and I can't prove they are Sprinco. I did not change them as a result. I paid $118 shipped to my door.

    I have a Brownells chrome BCG that I purchased last year. I do not believe it is made by MicroBest. It was listed as having a 9310 bolt. The markings are lasered instead of engraved like MicroBest. The original extractor spring and rings were pretty soft so I changed them to Sprinco. I paid $90 for the Brownells BCG, they are now listed for $120. I would choose the MicroBest over the Brownells but there is nothing wrong with the Brownells and will continue using it. The Brownells BCG has maybe 150 rounds on it.

    The last picture is a bolt face comparison of the Brownells BCG, MicroBest BCG, and a no-name BCG I bought for $40 five or six years ago. The no-name part is likely Chinese; it is out of spec in every way possible. You can see how bad it is with the naked eye looking at the lugs alone.

    I believe the MicroBest branded BCGs to be the best value options on the market today. I have been using their phosphate BCG's for many years. The chrome options are the sweet spot for quality, finish, and value. Everything you need, nothing you don't. If you do a web search for "chrome microbest bcg" you get tons of options at very good prices. I hope this helps.

    I can't insert pictures, only add them. The MicroBest is all chrome and new, the Brownells has phosphate fasteners and is used.
     

    Attachments

    • 20250222_183909.jpg
      20250222_183909.jpg
      964.8 KB · Views: 221
    • 20250222_183727.jpg
      20250222_183727.jpg
      911.4 KB · Views: 141
    • 20250222_183722.jpg
      20250222_183722.jpg
      932.4 KB · Views: 122
    • 20250222_183712.jpg
      20250222_183712.jpg
      894.2 KB · Views: 121
    • 20250222_183707.jpg
      20250222_183707.jpg
      883.2 KB · Views: 125
    • 20250222_184023.jpg
      20250222_184023.jpg
      796.2 KB · Views: 130
    • 20250222_184048.jpg
      20250222_184048.jpg
      494.6 KB · Views: 127
    • 20250222_184037.jpg
      20250222_184037.jpg
      588.2 KB · Views: 139
    • 20250222_184619.jpg
      20250222_184619.jpg
      458.1 KB · Views: 203
    • 20250222_184831.jpg
      20250222_184831.jpg
      412 KB · Views: 214
    Last edited:
    It would be interesting to hear why they switched to phosphate.
    A rudimentary search found reference that the change was simply due to the fact that the parkerized finish was; sufficient to the task, cheaper than chrome, and could be applied by more than the sole source vendor used for chrome plating. That parkerizing isn’t shiny and “holds lube” are ancillary.
     
    A rudimentary search found reference that the change was simply due to the fact that the parkerized finish was; sufficient to the task, cheaper than chrome, and could be applied by more than the sole source vendor used for chrome plating. That parkerizing isn’t shiny and “holds lube” are ancillary.
    If you simply found that by using the AI function I would not simply go off on that... Actually, during operation whatever it was called... The soldiers were told that they did not have to lube the Chrome BCG... It's caused problems.. AND, It was found that even the chrome had issues with jungle corrosion... So I think it was more than just a supply issue.
     
    If you simply found that by using the AI function I would not simply go off on that... Actually, during operation whatever it was called... The soldiers were told that they did not have to lube the Chrome BCG... It's caused problems.. AND, It was found that even the chrome had issues with jungle corrosion... So I think it was more than just a supply issue.
    AR15.com, for whatever it is worth, but the post cites references…

    IMG_7376.png
     
    I'm surprised phosphate lasted longer tbh I thought for sure the chrome would've won
    I suppose this is more of the hardness argument... Hard/brittle... Softer/ductile .... C158 / 9310 ... Etc... a lot of people don't realize that brass is actually pretty hard..., for example... But its brittle.. and as such, "easier" to machine...it just sort of flakes away...

    I can also assume that during the plating process, molecules bond to the surface of the substrate material... And during the natural case use, the chrome wears away, taking with it; some measurement of the substrate...however minute... Add to that, heat, pressure, etc...
     
    I suppose this is more of the hardness argument... Hard/brittle... Softer/ductile .... C158 / 9310 ... Etc... a lot of people don't realize that brass is actually pretty hard..., for example... But its brittle.. and as such, "easier" to machine...it just sort of flakes away...

    I can also assume that during the plating process, molecules bond to the surface of the substrate material... And during the natural case use, the chrome wears away, taking with it; some measurement of the substrate...however minute... Add to that, heat, pressure, etc...
    You couldn't possibly be more wrong about the forms of wear and / or scuffing /galling of hard chrome, if you tried....................................

    MM