• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    View thread

mid power scope $500-1k

penguinofsleep

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Nov 26, 2020
155
33
Somewhere USA
Looking for a FFP mid power scope around 3-15, 4-16, or 3-18 to put on a 6.5 grendel. Will be for plinking paper and steel, possibly hunting. Think of a typical SPR / DMR-ish "accurate enough" and not a trying to make a gas gun hit sub MOA targets consistently out at 1000 yards build.

Priorities will include a useful mil reticle at low and high power but moa reticle is acceptable if needed, forgiving eye box and parallax, not too narrow FOV, good clarity / transmission at dusk / dawn, <32oz ideally, ideally with illumination but not absolutely necessary.

Right now it's most likely going to be a Meopta Optika 6 3-18x50 mrad or Athlon Ares ETR 3-18 but am wondering if I'm missing anything else that may work in this price range. Other options I saw but haven't looked through before would be a 3-18 Strike Eagle or a Toric 2.5-15 although just looking at the reticle on paper I would prefer the meopta mrad reticle designed by DLO here.

I would also consider a(nother) Burris XTR3 (probably the non-ilum given the budget here) if I can find one for around or under $1k. I know the 3-18 Trijicon Tenmile was available for about $1100 a year or two ago but I missed that - not sure if either of these can be found for <$1k anymore. Also have an ATACR 4-16 (and a few other similar optics) and definitely acknowledge it's "better" than the above but not worth the $ to me here.
 
Just saw #6 in the below, might just fit the bill:


Good Luck with the hunt!
 
Looking for a FFP mid power scope around 3-15, 4-16, or 3-18 to put on a 6.5 grendel. Will be for plinking paper and steel, possibly hunting. Think of a typical SPR / DMR-ish "accurate enough" and not a trying to make a gas gun hit sub MOA targets consistently out at 1000 yards build.

Priorities will include a useful mil reticle at low and high power but moa reticle is acceptable if needed, forgiving eye box and parallax, not too narrow FOV, good clarity / transmission at dusk / dawn, <32oz ideally, ideally with illumination but not absolutely necessary.

Right now it's most likely going to be a Meopta Optika 6 3-18x50 mrad or Athlon Ares ETR 3-18 but am wondering if I'm missing anything else that may work in this price range. Other options I saw but haven't looked through before would be a 3-18 Strike Eagle or a Toric 2.5-15 although just looking at the reticle on paper I would prefer the meopta mrad reticle designed by DLO here.

I would also consider a(nother) Burris XTR3 (probably the non-ilum given the budget here) if I can find one for around or under $1k. I know the 3-18 Trijicon Tenmile was available for about $1100 a year or two ago but I missed that - not sure if either of these can be found for <$1k anymore. Also have an ATACR 4-16 (and a few other similar optics) and definitely acknowledge it's "better" than the above but not worth the $ to me here.
The new Vortex Viper HD is always a solid option.
 
I have successfully shot steel at 500 and mule deer out to 300 with the SWFA 6x on multiple rifles. This season, I witnessed my hunting partner shoot a mule deer at 400 yards with a single shot while carrying the SWFA 6x on his rifle. Based on my personal experience the SWFA 6x would be a great choice. No personal experience with the other choices you listed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kcormack
Looking for a FFP mid power scope around 3-15, 4-16, or 3-18 to put on a 6.5 grendel. Will be for plinking paper and steel, possibly hunting. Think of a typical SPR / DMR-ish "accurate enough" and not a trying to make a gas gun hit sub MOA targets consistently out at 1000 yards build.

Priorities will include a useful mil reticle at low and high power but moa reticle is acceptable if needed, forgiving eye box and parallax, not too narrow FOV, good clarity / transmission at dusk / dawn, <32oz ideally, ideally with illumination but not absolutely necessary.

Right now it's most likely going to be a Meopta Optika 6 3-18x50 mrad or Athlon Ares ETR 3-18 but am wondering if I'm missing anything else that may work in this price range. Other options I saw but haven't looked through before would be a 3-18 Strike Eagle or a Toric 2.5-15 although just looking at the reticle on paper I would prefer the meopta mrad reticle designed by DLO here.

I would also consider a(nother) Burris XTR3 (probably the non-ilum given the budget here) if I can find one for around or under $1k. I know the 3-18 Trijicon Tenmile was available for about $1100 a year or two ago but I missed that - not sure if either of these can be found for <$1k anymore. Also have an ATACR 4-16 (and a few other similar optics) and definitely acknowledge it's "better" than the above but not worth the $ to me here.

John
 
I have a Vortex Strike Eagle 3-18 on my .308 AR and it works great. Good solid optic in that price range. If you like the reticle you can save a couple hundred over the Meopta.

IMG_0129.jpeg
 
Thanks for the feedback everyone.

So far, it looks like I would still prefer the Meopta with the DLO mrad reticle, especially at lower mag. I do like the reticle enough that I'm willing to spend the $100-200 extra for it. It looks like there are no more Ares ETR 3-18 with mil reticles at this time (which makes sense given that the ETR 2 is supposed to be coming out soon-ish). Would have bought the XTR3 above immediately if it wasn't their SCR MOA reticle (not just b/c MOA, I just don't like the differences in the MOA reticle).

How's the reticle working out when actually looking through the glass at the lower and upper ends of magnification?

On paper, it looks like a blend of the NF mil XT and APRS series of reticles. Both are well done Christmas Tree reticles IMO, but I have a few minor dislikes with each reticle: With the NF mil XT, the "big" 1 mil dots on the tree are slightly too big and obstruct ability to see impact slightly or downrange conditions at times. With the APRS, I like it slightly more than the XT at higher magnification, but I don't know how much I would like the reticle as a whole at lower / middle magification for something that I may want to be able to "shoot faster" sometimes (i.e. same reticle would be fine for a bolt action for me). Are you able to "roughly" use the entire top half of the illuminated reticle as a "giant red dot" if you turn the brightness up (knowing that you may not hit dead center in the reticle if you do such a thing).