moa is terrible! ...why

[JByrd]

i hope moa continues to become even more unpopular so i can get lots of nice moa/moa scopes for the rest of my rifles for a fair price. mil/mil is the best! keep up the good work. but please,.... start quoting rifle accuracy in mils. whew ..i feel better now had to vent

 

[427Cobra]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

.1 mil, there you happy

 

[Austan]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

I can shoot sub 1 mil groups all day long, if I do my part.

 

[sniperaviator]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

The guy has a centimeter gun! (that is one centimeter in 100 meters, .1 mil). That is pretty damn good (about 1/4 moa for you english). Das is de vay dey sprecht it in Duetchland, ja?
Ja, die cm icht pretty fuggin gut!

 

[Bacarrat]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

I am partial to the metric adjustments myself....

 

[OFIS]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

 

[car2go4]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

im provt45 on this one.... we'll take the deals on ur moa scopes

 

[pupdawg]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: procovert45</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i hope moa continues to become even more unpopular so i can get lots of nice moa/moa scopes for the rest of my rifles for a fair price. mil/mil is the best! keep up the good work. but please,.... start quoting rifle accuracy in mils. whew ..i feel better now had to vent </div></div>

Just out of curiosity, what nice MOA/MOA scopes are you talking about specifically?

 

[JSTARSZ]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

ok, I like MOA/MOA too - how about a Vortex Razor EBR-1 reticle scope...I guess I will remain your other competitor for the MOA/MOA. I am waiting for the PST's to come out like everyone else.

 

[Guest]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

I want the IPHY ones with MDMOA reticals, 1/2 IPHY EREKS, an 1/2 IPHY M40 windage in 17 or 22X with either 44 or 58 mm bells, none lite.

 

[pupdawg]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gunfighter14e2</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I want the IPHY ones with MDMOA reticals, 1/2 IPHY EREKS, an 1/2 IPHY M40 windage in 17 or 22X with either 44 or 58 mm bells, none lite. </div></div>

No gunfighter, that's cheating.

The OP is talkin MOA/MOA not IPHY... I'd want one of those too.

I just want to know what scopes people are "dumping" in MOA/MOA specifically? NF maybe?

 

[Guest]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: pupdawg</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Gunfighter14e2</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I want the IPHY ones with MDMOA reticals, 1/2 IPHY EREKS, an 1/2 IPHY M40 windage in 17 or 22X with either 44 or 58 mm bells, none lite. </div></div>

No gunfighter, that's cheating.

The OP is talkin MOA/MOA not IPHY... I'd want one of those too.

I just want to know what scopes people are "dumping" in MOA/MOA specifically? NF maybe? </div></div>

Well if thought if mil/mil was so much better than anything else, there might be those that may want to dump their IPHY as well. I've only three so I have opening for more.

 

[Clark]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

View through a Leupold scope boosted by Premier Reticle looking at Leupold Zero Point magnetic illuminated bore sighter

Tit vs leg
Ford vs Chevy
Table saw vs radial arm saw
suspenders vs Belt
SUV vs Truck
Outboard vs Inboard
Gauss vs Tesla
electron Volt vs erg
beer vs whiskey
wet rub vs dry rub
troll vs mooch
moa vs mil

I am with the first of each choice.

 

[427Cobra]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bacarrat</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am partial to the metric adjustments myself.... </div></div>

No such thing

 

[Bacarrat]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 427Cobra</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bacarrat</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am partial to the metric adjustments myself.... </div></div>

No such thing </div></div>

Tell that to half the people on this forum.

 

[JByrd]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

OFIS avatar is hilarious , michael scott character , we all know a person/persons ,like this ,nightforce 5.5-25 np2 moa ,standardizing my herd

 

[jeffersonv]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

I think you are already there.
Seems like almost all USO SN3s on the optics for sale are MOA nowadays.
If there is a mil USO it doesn't seem to last long.

 

[Clark]

Re: moa is terrible! ...why

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bacarrat</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 427Cobra</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Bacarrat</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am partial to the metric adjustments myself.... </div></div>

No such thing </div></div>

Tell that to half the people on this forum. </div></div>

"Milliradian" has that metric twang to it.
Millipedes and centipedes are metric anthropods.
Milliseconds are double agents, at home in America AND Europe.