Must be true...

Sounds like bullshit to me.
Looks like a company is making a claim, that can not be verified, to make headlines. Which equals free advertising.
They say that the report is not outside funded. So why would they be checking into Burisma emails? They make no claim to have been hired by Burisma in the article. So how did they have access to their email account?
Lots of questions and little info.
 
More like...

"Look! We told you the Russians are helping Drumpf"

"See the Russians are still interfering in the elections and Drumpf does nothing"

Initiate investigation.

4 more years of resist.
 
More like...

"Look! We told you the Russians are helping Drumpf"

"See the Russians are still interfering in the elections and Drumpf does nothing"

Initiate investigation.

4 more years of resist.
More like 4 more years of congress not doing shit and raking in taxpayer money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSalty
Agree with both of you.

But if I were a bettin' man, somehow the leftists and media will try to pin on "orange man bad"...and use it for a basis for more obstruction.
 
Sounds like bullshit to me.
Looks like a company is making a claim, that can not be verified, to make headlines. Which equals free advertising.
They say that the report is not outside funded. So why would they be checking into Burisma emails? They make no claim to have been hired by Burisma in the article. So how did they have access to their email account?
Lots of questions and little info.
Thats my initial impression as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aries256