NASA admits that climate change occurs because of Earth’s solar obit

[Shooter McGavin]

Wonder how this will play out with the Dems running for prez.

NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and NOT because of SUVs and fossil fuels – NaturalNews.com

For more than 60 years, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has known that the changes occurring to planetary weather patterns are completely natural and normal. But the space agency, for whatever reason, has chosen to let the man-made global warming hoax persist and spread...

www.naturalnews.com

 

[Centuriator]

Bunch of hacks. Next thing they will try to tell us is that the earth is not flat.

 

[nn8734]

They will ignore it as usual. Their platform has nothing to do with solving climate-related problems or any issues impacting citizens for that matter.

They just want to control you and me and everyone else. They are tyrants. Other than T Gabbard, they are the reason the Second Amendment exists.

 

[Centuriator]

I would not regard that website to be an objective reliable source of information either.

 

[Mwalex]

Solar activity is the major driver for warming and cooling. Shame people are too stupid to embrace real science instead of something that fits their political narrative.

 

[Long Range 338]

The crazies will never be able to accept this as truth, its too easy to understand and makes total sense.

Insert "Inconceivable!" meme here...

 

[nn8734]

Earth’s orbital eccentricity and axis tilt change over cycles spanning tens of thousands of years. It’s these cycles that drive our movement in and out of ice ages (glaciacions). They also impact climate cycles of shorter duration such as thermal optimums and “mini ice ages”.

these tyrants push the fear mongering to a new level (AOC: word will end in 12 years if we don’t do “something”!).

If I ever had the opportunity to do so, I’d ask her and her stupid fucking comrades if they are concerned about Earth entering into a moist greenhouse state. I’d bet my life none of them ever heard the term and would have no idea how to answer the question.

They want to turn the USA into China or Venezuela.

For the record, earth has never been in a moist greenhouse state (at least not since the Hadean period 4+ billion years ago).

 

[pmclaine]

Statements of fact like that........how will the sheep be feared into fleecing their own wool?

We should care about our environment, in my AO its markedly better since the 70s, but carbon credits and giving up hamburgers is crazy talk.

 

[pmclaine]

And it took them how many years to admit it.

Yet tonight the news will lead to "Man made climate change created Dorian"

 

[pmclaine]

Earth’s orbital eccentricity and axis tilt change over cycles spanning tens of thousands of years. It’s these cycles that drive our movement in and out of ice ages (glaciacions). They also impact climate cycles of shorter duration such as thermal optimums and “mini ice ages”.

these tyrants push the fear mongering to a new level (AOC: word will end in 12 years if we don’t do “something”!).

If I ever had the opportunity to do so, I’d ask her and her stupid fucking comrades if they are concerned about Earth entering into a moist greenhouse state. I’d bet my life none of them ever heard the term and would have no idea how to answer the question.

They want to turn the USA into China or Venezuela.

For the record, earth has never been in a moist greenhouse state (at least not since the Hadean period 4+ billion years ago).

The biggest argument about doing nothing for climate change is AOC stating the world will end in ten years.

Sounds like we are already fucked so might as well burn all the coal we can right now.

Dumb.

 

[missed]

Science Schmiance......lol!

The ice age was a result of dinosaur farts and cavemen burning wood. not a giant meteor and solar cycles!

 

[Dunraven]

Earth’s orbital eccentricity and axis tilt change over cycles spanning tens of thousands of years. It’s these cycles that drive our movement in and out of ice ages (glaciacions). They also impact climate cycles of shorter duration such as thermal optimums and “mini ice ages”.

these tyrants push the fear mongering to a new level (AOC: word will end in 12 years if we don’t do “something”!).

If I ever had the opportunity to do so, I’d ask her and her stupid fucking comrades if they are concerned about Earth entering into a moist greenhouse state. I’d bet my life none of them ever heard the term and would have no idea how to answer the question.

They want to turn the USA into China or Venezuela.

For the record, earth has never been in a moist greenhouse state (at least not since the Hadean period 4+ billion years ago).

we are currently in an ice age. how do I know? There's ice at the poles! At what level of pretentiousness does MAN need to reach, to show up on earth, and decide that conditions must remain exactly as he found them, or it's a climate change disaster?

 

[FS1]

There ain’t no money in truth or facts. Lies are where the big bucks roll.

 

[Srgt. Hulka]

WTF?!?!?! Son of a bitch! My government and the media has been lying to me for 40 frikkin years?!?!
I want every bit of my g**damn money back that I've paid in taxes and fees over the decades to fight global cooling/global warming/climate change.

I guess Ethan Huff will soon have his brakes fail in his car, and die in a fiery crash.

 

[MtnCreek]

I learned this in middle school over 30 yrs ago. But we were freaking out about the ozone layer and dolphins getting netted.

 

[Graywolf.260]

Chemistry and physics should be required subjects in school.

 

[nn8734]

we are currently in an ice age. how do I know? There's ice at the poles! At what level of pretentiousness does MAN need to reach, to show up on earth, and decide that conditions must remain exactly as he found them, or it's a climate change disaster?

Yep and currently in an interglacial. Next advance is scheduled to happen ~50k years from now.

 

[texastonk]

I've read and heard both side of this argument for years. For every scientist that does a study, for every media oulet that publishes a study or opinion from a "reputable" source, the other side of the argument has studies and opinions that counter. In my opinion the truth is some where in the middle closer to the not likely man made but earth cycles. The stuff we put into the air is far more detrimental to humans in the short go than to earth in the long run. We should always try to protect the only place we have, but the cost and measures we take should not be to our detriment either.

Either way buy more ammo.

 

[softcock]

I would not regard that website to be an objective reliable source of information either.

-
Yes it's just Click bait . the article just uses old NASA data in an argument against , and nowhere in the read does NASA make a formal statement saying that they admit anything .
.
.