Is the New Zealand Navy that different from ours? The Captain is fully responsible for his vessel and receives the blame for any incident, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is the New Zealand Navy that different from ours? The Captain is fully responsible for his vessel and receives the blame for any incident, right?
Why are you asking me questions? The CO is responsible for the safe operation of the vessel, period. If operation contrary to policies, procedures, regulations, etc. is found to be the cause of an incident the CO is responsible. When was this determination made?Is the New Zealand Navy that different from ours? The Captain is fully responsible for his vessel and receives the blame for any incident, right?
No such thing, or have you gone all woke on us?
I've owned a business for over 30 years. If my employees / sub contractors screw up I am responsible. That's the way it is.
Out from what? You haven't made a good point yet!Well it's been fun triggering the simps but it's getting boring. I'm outtie.
Yer right. She's got no responsibility for the ship that she was assigned to be captain of.Which has absolutely nothing to do with anything in this thread. But I am certain you have an abundance of experience in your stated issues.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with anything ever said in this thread. Can you not read, or is it a conscious decision to simply not try?Yer right. She's got no responsibility for the ship that she was assigned to be captain of.
What a deal she got. All the pay and zero responsibility. Cuz that is how it works in the military. I can hear her now, "Sorry about your ship. Can I borrow another one?"
Oh, he can read fine. It's just so much fun spinning up a 'individual' like you.Which has absolutely nothing to do with anything ever said in this thread. Can you not read, or is it a conscious decision to simply not try?
Why are you asking me questions? The CO is responsible for the safe operation of the vessel, period. If operation contrary to policies, procedures, regulations, etc. is found to be the cause of an incident the CO is responsible. When was this determination made?
Indeed. I am sure you learned him to do so...Oh, he can read fine.
And that would be wrong. Policies, procedures, and regulations have to do with proper operation. Please state the evidence the ship was operated contrary to those. Grounding was the result. Please provide the evidence you have as to the cause.I'm just spitballing here, but I'd wager running a vessel aground is contrary to policies, procedures and regulations regarding safe operation of the vessel.
My mother was prettier than Johnny Depp. Maybe not by a lot.Your mom?
My mother was prettier than Johnny Depp. Maybe not by a lot.
Side story - There is a legend that a mother can mark a child by something that catches her attention. My brother is younger than I am. He was born in November of 1966. All that year was the premiere of "Star Trek." My mother's favorite character was Mr. Spock.
I shit you not, my brother has ears that come to a point. Not a sharp point like the prosthetics, but sharp enough.
My enduring question is when she was pregnant with me, why did she have to watch "Lassie"?
And that would be wrong. Policies, procedures, and regulations have to do with proper operation. Please state the evidence the ship was operated contrary to those. Grounding was the result. Please provide the evidence you have as to the cause.
That's a very well crafted debate tactic. Funny how you tried to reverse that and take it off the table. Probably would have worked in a freshman debate.And that would be wrong. Policies, procedures, and regulations have to do with proper operation. Please state the evidence the ship was operated contrary to those. Grounding was the result. Please provide the evidence you have as to the cause.
Then there would be no need for an investigation. The captain is guilty period. Sorry, that is not how it works. There are reasons other than incompetence for a grounding. Many. So the end result is NOT the proof.Dude, you're having trouble understanding other people.
But, to answer your question, here goes.
The ship running aground IS the evidence the ship was being operated contrary to policies, procedures and regulations.
I suggest that you read and take to heart, Jocko's 'Extreme Ownership'. She owns it an no matter how hard YOU try to make excuses for her, SHE owns it. You border on pathetic.Then there would be no need for an investigation. The captain is guilty period. Sorry, that is not how it works. There are reasons other than incompetence for a grounding. Many. So the end result is NOT the proof.
![]()
'Electronics malfunction' to blame for freighter mishap in Detroit River, Coast Guard says
Until repairs are made and the ship is cleared, it cannot continue on its voyage to Milwaukee, the Coast Guard said.www.freep.com
I suggest that you read and take to heart, Jocko's 'Extreme Ownership'. She owns it an no matter how hard YOU try to make excuses for her, SHE owns it. You border on pathetic.
Then there would be no need for an investigation. The captain is guilty period. Sorry, that is not how it works. There are reasons other than incompetence for a grounding. Many. So the end result is NOT the proof.
![]()
'Electronics malfunction' to blame for freighter mishap in Detroit River, Coast Guard says
Until repairs are made and the ship is cleared, it cannot continue on its voyage to Milwaukee, the Coast Guard said.www.freep.com
That's a fucking river, not the open ocean.
Yer right. She's got no responsibility for the ship that she was assigned to be captain of.
What a deal she got. All the pay and zero responsibility. Cuz that is how it works in the military. I can hear her now, "Sorry about your ship. Can I borrow another one?"
You do know why there's an investigation don't you?Then there would be no need for an investigation. The captain is guilty period. Sorry, that is not how it works. There are reasons other than incompetence for a grounding. Many. So the end result is NOT the proof.
You might know this:...I was on a Navy ship that tagged a rock. Next port, new Capt. That’s how it works...
Uh huh.What we don't have is a regular supply of dickheads that need shooting coming across the border.
Yes because Didnt Earn It isn’t a thing right.There’s been a lot of stupid shit posted in the bear pit but this has to be right towards the top. The fact that some of you honestly believe that the reason she crashed is because she’s female and/or lesbian is comical. I work with some of the most respected eye surgeons in the country and what a surprise, some of them are women! Not only that, a couple are even gay! Gasp! Some of you couldn’t pass a basic math test and you are going to judge a navy captain. In case you’re wondering why no women will sleep with you you might start here. And no, having to pay for it doesn’t count.
Legal immigration - it's a thing.Uh huh.
![]()
New Zealand immigration hits an all-time high as movement surges following pandemic lull
WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — New Zealand’s immigration numbers have hit an all-time high, enabling employers to fill jobs but also putting pressure on the housing market, according to econo…www.8newsnow.com
Slightly before my time. IIRC it was ‘93 off Somalia the Wasp tagged a rock while doing circles. The Navy didn’t air their dirty laundry to us, but there was a new Capt pretty quickly.As expected?
Please expand on that useless response. Because you said exactly nothing.
You remind me of my ex wife who always had to say something stupid under her breath as she left the room.
Maybe you should add in another, "go read a book".
You love to insult people, but hate it when it's turned on you.
There isn't a single SH member here that would label me as being in cahoots with @DarnYankeeUSMC to include himself. We've practically argued against each other in every topic that we've ever crossed paths with and frankly I don't like him all that much. But in this topic- I will fully defer to the gentlemen and agree with 100% of what he's trying to educate you on.Which has absolutely nothing to do with anything ever said in this thread. Can you not read, or is it a conscious decision to simply not try?
Name one...Then there would be no need for an investigation. The captain is guilty period. Sorry, that is not how it works. There are reasons other than incompetence for a grounding. Many. So the end result is NOT the proof.
![]()
'Electronics malfunction' to blame for freighter mishap in Detroit River, Coast Guard says
Until repairs are made and the ship is cleared, it cannot continue on its voyage to Milwaukee, the Coast Guard said.www.freep.com
What about that captain of a cruise ship who ran aground and half-capsized the ship because he was showing off to his girlfriend?
I don't think he was lesbian or any kind of DEI hire.
I am not reading through this whole thread. I do think a full investigation must be made to prove or disprove incompetence. I think the carpet munching is secondary. And even if she was promoted in order to comply with DEI, being a DEI hire is not the cause of the accident. I am not defending her or even backing up @AZLong .
I don't know if I can make the point any clearer.
I get it, they have not lost a ship since the time of WWII. And the only time they have lost one is just now. And I am okay that it turns out to be DEI hire causes problems, And I think it does.
A long time ago, before you could get you engineer stamp, you had to work in the field and log some time doing road construction or electrical work. An architect had to weld or nail on a few tails before designing them for others.
Problem was, most woman and, of course, cripples could not complete the physical work requirements. So, they got rid of that internship requirement. And so you have engineers and architects designing stuff, never having once picked a hammer.
I've been in a taxi in Naples, utter madness.He was Italian… have you driven in Naples?
Heck, the whole post WW2 Italian Navy has glass-bottomed boats so they can see the pre-WW2 Navy.
Plus likker was involved in both cases!
Sirhr
That's where you're completely wrong about most of us.
I wouldn't expect you to recognize that, since you couldn't be wrong about anything, and everyone else is at fault for her having the accident.
I don't give a flying rats ass who is or was in the seat and I stated that. You conveniently skimmed over it so you could browbeat us with your moral and intellectual superiority.
How many vessel/craft investigations have you been intimately involved in?
Have you answered any of the questions we've asked of you?
What proof have you shown the Captain in change of the vessel followed all procedures and regulations?
So shut your leftist fucking dick sucker.
I wish you the best of luck. Rather odd goal, but to each his own.I think someone is trying to get laid by a lesbian.