Rifle Scopes NF 4-16 ATACR Reticle Choice

MS660Magnum

Private
Minuteman
Jun 27, 2020
18
8
I’m looking at a new scope for a general purpose .308 win, and I’m strongly considering the 4-16x42 F1 ATACR, and I’m trying to decide which reticle would be best.

Option 1 is the MIL-XT. I know I like the tree-style reticles I’ve used (Vortex), but I’m concerned that the MIL-XT might be a little busy for that application (non-competition/general purpose .308), and I worry it will be hard to see in a 4-16 power scope.

Option 2 is the MOAR. I know, apples to oranges, but I typically shoot MOA and, importantly, so do most of my usual companions. It seems cleaner, but would I be missing out on a lot of capability, especially considering the relatively low magnification of the scope?
 
Also, as a third option, scrap the ATACR and go with a Leupold MK5 3.6-18x44. I already have one of those and I know I like it, but (strangely) I haven’t seen much comparison between that and the ATACR 4-16x42.
 
If you think the MOAR is good maybe give the Mil-R a look. They seem to go for less 2nd hand too.

I personally like all of their reticles and any would work.
 
Lol. Already there’s disagreement.

For those that have spent time behind it, how visible is the MIL-XT at lower power? It seems fairly popular on the 5-25x and 7-35x scopes, but less common on the 4-16x.
 
Welp, after days in and out of the digital shopping cart, I’ve finally hit checkout on a 4-16x42 f1 ATACR with Mil-XT. Definitely sets my new record for pricy optics. I hope the reticle won’t be too busy for my intended purpose. Plus I guess now I’ll be running a mixed fleet of mil and moa scopes.

I’ll be interested in comparing it to the Leupold Mk5 3.6-18x44 that I’ve already got, since they’re both aimed at similar markets and applications.