• Top Shot Throwback Contest - Only a Few Hours Left To Enter!

    Tell us about your best shot or proudest moment on the range this past year! Winner gets new limited edition Hide merch. Remember, subscribers have a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Not what l expected

snowplow

Sergeant of the Hide
Minuteman
Oct 1, 2024
157
31
WA
I was shooting an 18" 1/8 twist ar15 the other day and was surprised that it grouped great with 55 gr bullets and got progressively worse as they got heavier (60, 68, and 77gr). I figured this would shoot the 68 if not the 77s. I'm no expert so I figured I'd post and see your thoughts. Should my next step be get a bunch of 55s and see what it shoots best out of the bunch, or is this weird and should I experiment with other heavier rounds? This is intended to be more of a long-range gun, so I certainly wouldn't mind shooting something heavier but it's not the end of the world.
 
I’ve got a supposed (haven’t measured it with a cleaning rod) Black Hole 1:8” 16” that groups okay with 55 Hornady Softpoints, is downright scary with 53 V-Maxes, and won’t group a 75 BTHP or 73 ELD for squat.

Haven’t tried any of the midweight bullets.
 
More info is necessary for the test ammo before any determination can be made. Specifically, what were your shooting? 55, 68, and 77 grain is not informative.
 
I wasn't being very scientific about this, I just grabbed a mix of what was on the shelf.

Barrel is a Ballistic Advantage .223 Wylde stainless fluted 18" 1/8 SPR. It is basically new. It's had about 50 rounds through it so far.

.223 55 gr Hornady Vmax Varmint express

.223 60 gr Ammo Inc Vmax

.556 68 gr Frontier bthp match

.556 77 gr AAC Sierra TMK
 
Ok that helps. I'll try out some more of various weights that are a good known accurate load. I actually thought the AAC tmk was supposed to be good. Any recommendations on what l should buy?
 
Yeah, I’d say your results are as much a factor of the manufacture as the grain weight. Ammo inc and AAC aren’t exactly match loads.

Sample size of one here, but I’ve shot a few cases of Ammo Inc 60gr vmax and it’s consistently a great performer. This is the non-reman version. No idea about any other selections they make though.
 
No offense to you, but your BA barrel might need more breaking in.
It is a "bargain" priced barrel... and isn't known to be great shooters out of the box.

Clean the barrel thoroughly... "feeling" for any burrs while doing so.... I could be as simple as a burr at the gas port.

Frankly, some Aero / BA barrels have been known to be a "hit or miss" out of the box.

AND... as mentioned, I also agree with the don't shoot one OEM round right after another... in my experience, a barrel needs to be "seasoned" in to any round... IE I allow a group of ( at least ) 5rds to be a throw away group, prior to shooting that ammo for precision.
I have seen groups shrink as the barrel "seasons" in to the next OEM load... not just sometimes, not every time ... but enough to realize it does matter.

I would suggest 2 different approaches...
Try a variety of OEM 77gr ammo... to try and find a round it likes. It can work.

Some barrels just don't like Hornady bullets Ogives.

The 77gr TMK is known to be fussy, at times.

Or replace the barrel now, with a better barrel. All my Criterion barrels shoot very well.

I realize the second version sounds a bit drastic... but... you might spend a crap load of money , on ammo, trying to "make" the BA barrel shoot to your expectations.

FWIW... I have one FN CHF SS .223 Wylde 20" 1n7 barrel, that only really likes one, specific brand 77gr ammo.... and I tried a ton of different OEM 77gr loads trying to make that one shoot the way I wanted.

Being a stubborn cuss... I would probably try a few of the "bargain" priced 77gr loads available.
PSA / AAC makes moderately priced 77gr loads, PMC, Sellier and Bellot, PPU as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mtrmn and Redlion
I agree to shoot more and see what you get. As said, BA barrels are not top shelf, but you could get lucky and get an accurate one. Federal Gold Medal Match 69grn .223 ammo usually groups well. May be worth a try.
 
... BA barrel ...
It is a "bargain" priced barrel... and isn't known to be great shooters out of the box.

The 77gr TMK is known to be fussy, at times.

... replace the barrel now, with a better barrel. All my Criterion barrels shoot very well.

I realize the second version sounds a bit drastic... but... you might spend a crap load of money , on ammo, trying to "make" the BA barrel shoot to your expectations.

Seeing many, many examples of Ballistic Advantage and Faxon barrels -- I wouldn't waste my money and patience.
If your rifle won't shoot a decent flat-based benchrest bullet or factory Federal 69 Match ammo sub-MOA at 100 and 200 yards you are flushing good money down the toilet.

You will probably want a 69-grain and heavier match bullet for consistency and wind resistance to 500 yards
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bfoosh006
I know the 69 grain Fed GMM is supposed to be in .223 the equivalent to 168gr Fed GMM in 308...in that if a gun can't shoot that, it might not shoot period.

Don't know if it's a post-covid QC issue, but in picking up some 69gr FGMM cheap lately, it's been rather disappointing compared to its 77gr tmk or 73gr Berger counterparts from Federal in at least 1/2 of my guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bfoosh006
I completely forgot to mention this above. As I said, my criterion barrels don't typically like Hornady bullets, but I've had good luck with the AAC 55gr Saber Blades. They often go on sale for .40 to .45 a round and I've been using them for my out to 400 shooting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bfoosh006