Re: Optimal LEO Scope
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: USACS</div><div class="ubbcode-body">When looking for a new sniper rifle optic, I think it's of paramount importance to make as informed of a decision as possible. This means looking at all the options available and doing the research on all of the options. Then, using that information to buy the best optic you can that meets as many of your needs as possible within the allotted budget.
I don't think a lot of agencies are doing this correctly. My agency is a good example. We had Vari-X IIIs for a long time. They finally got the go-ahead to replace them two years ago. Of the 6 snipers, only 1 is somewhat knowledgeable about scopes. The other 5 are not. The powers that be also don't know much about optics. So, they went with what they knew and decided that they were going to get Mark4s. They didn't do any research, they didn't bother consulting with the armorers, they didn't even see if anyone might have other suggestions from personal experience. The Mark4s are decent scopes, but they wound up being a compromise instead of a perfect fit.
Our SERT team is county-wide, and we are on the edge of a metropolitan area where part of the county is suburban, and the other part is wide-open farmland. Our callouts have been about 80% suburban neighborhood residential, but we do get some out in the county. We had a recent one where we assisted the BATFE on a major search warrant on a farm for a guy making explosives and selling them. Our sniper teams were several hundred yards off surveilling the property for several hours prior to the raid.
The one guy with the 3.5-10x40 LR/T is unhappy because 10x is not enough for a top end for the county callouts, and the other snipers with the 4.5-14x50 LR/Ts are unhappy because the 3.5x is better than the 4.5x for FOV on close suburban targets. I showed one of them the specs on a NF NXS 3.5-15x50 SFP <span style="color: #FF0000">MOA/MLR</span> w/ zero stops, and then explained optical quality and the same rugged military trials and field use (and abuse), and his response was something like "why the hell didn't we get that scope?"
It was because nobody bothered to do the research to find a scope that better suited their needs. It's good that you're doing the research, and I think it's truly the most responsible thing to do. So kudos. </div></div>
This is a well reasoned reply; I too feel that the SFP NF NSX 3.5-15x is an outstanding LEO precision optic. However, why wouldn't you opt for matching mil/mil, such as MRAD with the MLR reticle (or MOA/MOA for that matter)?
I do agree that many LEO's know very little about the equipment they use. When I was a police officer, many officers in my fairly large PD had no idea what handgun they carried other than "Sig" or "S&W", and some didn't even know the manufacturer. I thought that was pretty sad.