Poll-Help me change the NFA

[Birddog1911]

Moderator: If you feel there is a more appropriate section, please feel free to move this there.

This poll is to conduct research on changing the NFA rules. While I would support a complete removal of the law, I don't believe that it will happen anytime soon.

So what I'm trying to do is appeal to a politicians base emotion; greed. I plan to write to a willing congressional delegate to change the law, and greatly lower the cost of an NFA tax stamp. I hope this will also help repeal the 1986 full auto law, as well.

Please, answer the poll and tell me what you think. I will be cross posting this at every gun forum for which I am a member, and ask that you do NOT hit the poll at the other sites, in order to maintain the accuracy and integrity of the poll.

The choices are:

I would not own a registered firearm or device, regardless of cost

I would own a registered firearm or device, regardless of cost

I would own a registered firearm or device if the cost were greatly reduced

I would own multiple registered firearms or devices if the costs were greatly reduced

I do ask that we try to keep this poll at the top for at least a week, so that I may collect as much data as possible. Once I have collected as much as I can, I will be writing Doug Lamborn to propose the bill, or whatever measure may be used.

 

[Switchblade]

Re: Poll-Help me change the NFA

Alphabet organizations do not have Constitutional Powers to make their own rules. Therefore, any Alphabet named Organization has no true legal power. Read the Constitution:

“ No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">(This means no state can make any law repugnant to the constititutional rights of the citizen, ie BAN any firearm)</span></span> nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. ”

Any federal rule made by an alphabet organization is repugnant to the constitution as it was not created by the legislation, nor was it ratified by the house.

Therefore, any ban on any firearm is repugnant to the laws of the land as prescribed by the Second Ammendment

<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic"><span style="text-decoration: underline">As passed by the Congress:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

As ratified by the States:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
</span></span></span>

Common Language as ratified by every state..."shall not be infringed"

 

[slowkota]

Re: Poll-Help me change the NFA

I don't have a problem with the stamp cost... its the ridiculous price of most FA firearms, that is holding me back from ownership!

 

[KYS]

Re: Poll-Help me change the NFA

If the cost of the stamp had inflated with the passing years it would be almost $2000.00 an item now. I wouldnt kick the hornets nest.....

Its not the price, its the wait times.

 

[Alderleet]

Re: Poll-Help me change the NFA

Your rights will not be infringed, unless the NFA deems it a classified device...

 

[patriotoutlaw]

Re: Poll-Help me change the NFA

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Switchblade</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Alphabet organizations do not have Constitutional Powers to make their own rules. Therefore, any Alphabet named Organization has no true legal power. Read the Constitution:

“ No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; <span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">(This means no state can make any law repugnant to the constititutional rights of the citizen, ie BAN any firearm)</span></span> nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. ”

Any federal rule made by an alphabet organization is repugnant to the constitution as it was not created by the legislation, nor was it ratified by the house.

Therefore, any ban on any firearm is repugnant to the laws of the land as prescribed by the Second Ammendment

<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic"><span style="text-decoration: underline">As passed by the Congress:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

As ratified by the States:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
</span></span></span>

Common Language as ratified by every state..."shall not be infringed" </div></div>




YES! and THANK YOU!