So, I own a 3-15x50 Premier Heritage scope. It's a great scope but my only complaint is that the parallax adjustment has no point of reference. Compared with my S&B 5-25x56 PM2 which has reference points for parallax adjustment, this is kind of a pain. Especially when completing in a timed match where I don't have a bunch of time to monkey around with things like this.
Anyway, Premier recently came out with a parallax dial that essentially looks like a pie shaped wedge. Top of the wedge is the closest adjustment and the sideways eight symbol for infinity is at the bottom of the wedge. In my opinion this isn't as good as the S&B but, I called Premier to talk to them about an upgrade nonetheless. I can't remember what the name of the technician I talked to at Premier was but, it looks like there are three downsides to the upgrade. First, it costs $125.00. Second, he told me that they have to take the whole scope apart to install the dial and he doesn't recommend that because there is a chance that debris could get in the scope when they do this, (this seemed really bogus to me). Third, he indicated that you are just getting a wedge and it really don't help a whole lot.
Furthermore, (and this is where I would like some comment), he said that the parallax for each scope varies depending on elevation, barometric pressure and temperature. Because of this, he recommended that I go to Staples and get a silver fine tip Sharpie and manually write the parallax ranges on the parallax dial based on the environmental conditions in my area.
If this is the case, the only real fixed condition would be elevation. Even this will change depending on where I am shooting the gun. I suspect that these factors are <span style="text-decoration: underline">very</span> minor and I can't imagine that they would really impact the parallax ranges.
I have come to the conclusion that it really isn't worth sending the scope back to Premier for the upgrade. However, I really would like to have the parallax ranges on the dial. I am very insecure with the concept of taking a Sharpie and marking up a $2,500+ scope. Plus, I don't know that I would even be able to accurately range the parallax to start out with.
If anyone out there is familiar with this process or has any comments I would very much appreciate your feedback.
Anyway, Premier recently came out with a parallax dial that essentially looks like a pie shaped wedge. Top of the wedge is the closest adjustment and the sideways eight symbol for infinity is at the bottom of the wedge. In my opinion this isn't as good as the S&B but, I called Premier to talk to them about an upgrade nonetheless. I can't remember what the name of the technician I talked to at Premier was but, it looks like there are three downsides to the upgrade. First, it costs $125.00. Second, he told me that they have to take the whole scope apart to install the dial and he doesn't recommend that because there is a chance that debris could get in the scope when they do this, (this seemed really bogus to me). Third, he indicated that you are just getting a wedge and it really don't help a whole lot.
Furthermore, (and this is where I would like some comment), he said that the parallax for each scope varies depending on elevation, barometric pressure and temperature. Because of this, he recommended that I go to Staples and get a silver fine tip Sharpie and manually write the parallax ranges on the parallax dial based on the environmental conditions in my area.
If this is the case, the only real fixed condition would be elevation. Even this will change depending on where I am shooting the gun. I suspect that these factors are <span style="text-decoration: underline">very</span> minor and I can't imagine that they would really impact the parallax ranges.
I have come to the conclusion that it really isn't worth sending the scope back to Premier for the upgrade. However, I really would like to have the parallax ranges on the dial. I am very insecure with the concept of taking a Sharpie and marking up a $2,500+ scope. Plus, I don't know that I would even be able to accurately range the parallax to start out with.
If anyone out there is familiar with this process or has any comments I would very much appreciate your feedback.