Re: Premier Reticles scope question
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 19Scout77</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: runngun</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why? The one that comes with it is better, and the Butler Creek wouldn't fit well over the raised edge anyway. </div></div>
They are a striking example of over-engineering.
The POS covers should be tossed as far and as fast as possible. The let in a TON of dust and water and the minute you carry your rig slung, the ocular cover pops off.
IMO the ONLY problem with the PRH 5-25 is the ocular cover. IT CAN BE FIXED!! First, focus your reticle and lock down the lock ring. Then take a No 17 butler creek ocular cover and stick it is a sealed ziploc freezer bag, and stick in a put of boiling water for a 30 seconds or so--in order to make more pliable the BC--but keep it dry (hence the ziploc). While the BC is still hot, sling it on over the eyepiece and past the locking ring until it is fully seated and straight. Leave it open and let it cool off before you close it so you don't cause any condensation, and you are done, and it ends up looking like this.
Hot water is a tight fitting BC's friend!
</div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: runngun</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Why? The one that comes with it is better, and the Butler Creek wouldn't fit well over the raised edge anyway. </div></div>
<span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-style: italic">runngun</span></span>,
I'm curious - what in your opinion makes the Premier Ocular cover better than a Butler Creek, especially when fitted as <span style="font-style: italic">19Scout77</span> described above?
Keith