Thanks for the input from everyone. Other than being slightly heavier, what is the downside of using the double pull?
I’m going to disagree with all the double-pull glazing. It’s too tall for regular use…..is the downside.
I don’t want to say that the triple pull is a solution looking for a problem, I know the hunter guys like them, but it’s got to be close to that. I live in the mountain west and have never really shot a PRS match on a “square range”. I’ve shot matches (PRS and Comp Dynamics, not hunter) all over Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico, Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma and I would still never spend the money on a double or triple pull for any of these matches. Most of the time, I use a PRS length ckye pod…unless the feet are too wide and then it’s Harris. I’ve always made up any height I needed with sliding the bipod back on the rail or picking a different position-solution. I suppose the OP could pack that triple pull around to help balance the load in his backpack or as a backup at a match that had golf-cart/SxS support but I doubt he will find much use for it.
Perhaps the difference is that most PRS stages include some phrasing that makes it so that a prop has to be used “to support” the rifle. Whereas hunter stages give you a limited shooting area and put tall grass, shrubs, etc in the way. In one case, super tall bipod legs can lift you over the shit but in the other, longer legs don’t make a prop more useful as a support.
One, maybe two stages at Cameo, one at Blue Steel Ranch (Steel Safari) none that I can think of in OK, TX, KS, or WY. Out of 200 some odd stages of National Match shooting? Hardly seems super useful.