Question about neck tension consistency

Too soft of a neck,

A buddy that was attempting to make an affordable device that predicted neck tension well before the seating process, ran a year long test. I was part of the test. We tracked thousands of rounds using balances that were kernel accurate and procedures that ensued charge weights and ogive to base were consistent on seated water sorted, kiss turned brass.

In a nutshell, here is what we learned regaurding seating pressure:
  • Soft seating <25lbs worked well on chambers were the lands created the final seating depth. (of course you'd never want this in a field gun) In a gun with jump SDs were very high - the worst of the bunch
  • A lot of combinations non-turned brass run sized of seated round -.002-.003 could produce over 100lbs of seating force with higher SDs
  • 55-35lbs seemed the sweet spot for normal custom chambers.
We also noted that some brass preep methods that stripped the insides of the necks like aggressive utrasonic cleaning, created issues.

All that said, in a nut shell, I've won positional matches with factory ammo. I now minimally prep brass (will FL/Bushing and use a Trimiit to get both iinside and outside in one pass), do not sort, run a A&D with auto Trickler for super fast powder drops seat on an arbor. I do move any outliers off to the side and use to zero or foul, but other than that call it a day. For PRS/NRL most of the targets are large and fairly close.. It is the wind, time and wobble that make us miss... not a bit of imperfection in the ammo.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EchoDeltaSierra
Since you’re into learning...

Too soft of a neck, wrong (not necessarily inconsistent) charge weight/oal, primer incompatibility, yield high ES/SD. If you’re at max pressure, any little variance has a huge effect. It’s like leverage in your press: the closer you’re to TDC, the more leverage you have. The closer you are to max, the more leverage variables have.

This is sage wisdom!

I’ve been working and sharing with a group of friends all chasing this same unicorn and we collectively discovered is that when one improves something in an aspect of the overall system, it seems to provide enough precision to reveal that next thing one is screwing up.
 
All that said, in a nut shell, I've won positional matches with factory ammo. I now minimally prep brass (will FL/Bushing and use a Trimiit to get both iinside and outside in one pass), do not sort, run a A&D with auto Trickler for super fast powder drops seat on an arbor. I do move any outliers off to the side and use to zero or foul, but other than that call it a day. For PRS/NRL most of the targets are large and fairly close.. It is the wind, time and wobble that make us miss... not a bit of imperfection in the ammo.

This is perfect!

I fully realize there’s a point where me scientific curiosity will push me into territory that doesn’t do a damn thing to make me a better shooter. I’m doing my part to learn wind better and NRL22 is proving to be a great way to learn “me”. Being that, my expectation is finding an efficient method to produce high-volume ammo that bests match grade with minimal time+cost as possible. This is my unicorn, plus as soon as I figure it out with the 6.5CR, I have a 300 WinMag to perfect.
 
^ on my set away from going nuts on every detail, I've been selling off some of my no-longer needed or used gear..

Just sold a Benchsource annealer and listing a bunch of digital comparators, stuff I've tried... I just wish I didn't go down that rabbet hole in the first place.. ya I know more today than I did, but I am not sure the $$ and time was worth it.
 
This is perfect!

I fully realize there’s a point where me scientific curiosity will push me into territory that doesn’t do a damn thing to make me a better shooter. I’m doing my part to learn wind better and NRL22 is proving to be a great way to learn “me”. Being that, my expectation is finding an efficient method to produce high-volume ammo that bests match grade with minimal time+cost as possible. This is my unicorn, plus as soon as I figure it out with the 6.5CR, I have a 300 WinMag to perfect.

Minimal time and low cost don't seem to go together with reloading.
 
Minimal time and low cost don't seem to go together with reloading.

Point taken. Maybe I should say I’m trying to avoid additional unnecessary expense; like jacking up 50 pieces of Nosler brass, or chronographing a ladder then realizing I had a .2 grain drift between two scales, or... or...

Humans who chase perfection amuse me.