I've got some questions concerning camouflage.
I see lot of very nice paint jobs on rifles, some seem to almost disappear into the background which is the idea.
But do certain paint schemes become less effective at intermediate distances. What I mean is that do certain schemes seem to blend back together to reform the outline of a rifle and become more visible out to the point where the eye looses the ability to pick out detail. Kind of like when you're hunting and you don't see the deer at first per se, you see a horizontal line in a sea of vertical tree trunks.
If that's the case, would it be better to paint a rifle in larger "prints" to break up the outline? How about like applying face paint where you paint recessed areas a lighter color and protruding areas a darker color.
Or do you just find a good color scheme for the area as a base, pattern it anyway you like and rely on other materials to break up the outline (sounds the best but may not always be practical).
I hope this makes sense.
Paul
I see lot of very nice paint jobs on rifles, some seem to almost disappear into the background which is the idea.
But do certain paint schemes become less effective at intermediate distances. What I mean is that do certain schemes seem to blend back together to reform the outline of a rifle and become more visible out to the point where the eye looses the ability to pick out detail. Kind of like when you're hunting and you don't see the deer at first per se, you see a horizontal line in a sea of vertical tree trunks.
If that's the case, would it be better to paint a rifle in larger "prints" to break up the outline? How about like applying face paint where you paint recessed areas a lighter color and protruding areas a darker color.
Or do you just find a good color scheme for the area as a base, pattern it anyway you like and rely on other materials to break up the outline (sounds the best but may not always be practical).
I hope this makes sense.
Paul