forgive my rookie questions. I have read through the Q&A but still need some help.
1. can a mils/mils setup from say S&B and/or USO be used in meters as easy as it can be used in yards? Or will the mils reticle not work? For example if your dope is in meters. Could you use a mil reticle to do the hold over with the dope you have in meters? Obviously .1 mil is .36" at 100yds but are they both .39" at 100m?
2. Is the mils mils setup pretty much only used with YARDS over here?
3. I understand the idea that if you miss your spotter calls the mis value in mils. 1/2 a mil 1 mil etc. But what if your spotter doesn't have a mil reticle in his spotting scope and calls the wind something like 6" , 1 foot 18" 2 feet to the right etc. Then what?
4. regarding the above. Couldn't it be argued that a moa reticle would be more accurate in calling the missed shot vs a mil? (assuming the moa reticle has marks spaced 1moa apart) since the smallest spaced mark on a mil reticle I've found is half a mil which is approx 1.8moa. So in otherwords the moa reticle with marks spaced 1moa apart would be more precise then the half mil space. Granted 1moa is 10" at 1000yds but half a mil is 18" at 1000yds. So that is quite the difference.
5. what are some advantages with the mil system over the moa system? Assuming you have true moa reticle and true moa clicks in your scope.

1. can a mils/mils setup from say S&B and/or USO be used in meters as easy as it can be used in yards? Or will the mils reticle not work? For example if your dope is in meters. Could you use a mil reticle to do the hold over with the dope you have in meters? Obviously .1 mil is .36" at 100yds but are they both .39" at 100m?
2. Is the mils mils setup pretty much only used with YARDS over here?
3. I understand the idea that if you miss your spotter calls the mis value in mils. 1/2 a mil 1 mil etc. But what if your spotter doesn't have a mil reticle in his spotting scope and calls the wind something like 6" , 1 foot 18" 2 feet to the right etc. Then what?
4. regarding the above. Couldn't it be argued that a moa reticle would be more accurate in calling the missed shot vs a mil? (assuming the moa reticle has marks spaced 1moa apart) since the smallest spaced mark on a mil reticle I've found is half a mil which is approx 1.8moa. So in otherwords the moa reticle with marks spaced 1moa apart would be more precise then the half mil space. Granted 1moa is 10" at 1000yds but half a mil is 18" at 1000yds. So that is quite the difference.
5. what are some advantages with the mil system over the moa system? Assuming you have true moa reticle and true moa clicks in your scope.