Sidearms & Scatterguns Red dot or not on your "life or death" pistol?

Well used GIGN Bren 2, in 7.62x39. Acog+rmr. No iron sights. But, it probably never made the dangerous journey to the neighborhood 7-11.

IMG_0295.png

Image screen capped form Forgotten Weapons video on the rifle…
 
For those saying they are slower with the dot, you just need more practice with the dot.

When I transitions to dots I significantly lost speed, most of that was the initial shot trying to find the dot. Once the dot was acquired I was faster unless I lost the dot.

The key, at least for me, was getting the muscle memory so that as soon as the pistol presents the dot is already on target and in the middle of the window. Hours or dry fire practice at the house. Draw, find the dot repeat.

Now, unless I change guns with significantly different ergos, the dot is 99% of the time in the middle of the window and already on target or dang close. I’m am significantly faster, more consistent, and more accurate with the dot.

As far as durability/reliability, military and police are using them, competitors are using them, boat loads of civilians are using them……. I’m not worried about it with the current field of higher end, name brand dots. My personal experience of 2 holosun 507c’s, a 407c, 407k, 4 507 comps, 2 leupold delta point pros and only had 1 failure. An early delta point pro that the contact for the battery broke.
 
Talks about a gun getting beat up then decides to put most fragile trijicon dot made on a carry gun. Logical......

Not illogical. The SRO may not be their toughest design but it’s no dainty princess either. It makes up for it in field of view. I also said that a gun getting beat up is something to be aware of. It doesn’t matter what optic you have, you still wanna take care of it and do your best to keep it out of harms way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ankeny
I think we have come too several different arguments here.
IF the dot functions properly it should be faster on target with some improved accuracy
IF the dot fails which is possible you can lose up to two seconds by the time you realize it failed, acquire irons and get onto target.
IF you need sights at what would be the range to engage with a pistol you need more practice
Three very different arguments even though all are true IMO
 
I said " Should the dot fail for any reason"
Old friend I keep
My iron lined up so I can see through the red dot if it fails.

I also add angled shim so red dot is usually, depending on weapon, zeros to co align with irons

Basically my red dot lolly pops on top of the iron sights
 
Old friend I keep
My iron lined up so I can see through the red dot if it fails.

I also add angled shim so red dot is usually, depending on weapon, zeros to co align with irons

Basically my red dot lolly pops on top of the iron sights
I ran a vortex that failed, at the worst time, luckily it was just a match. Once I had the cataracts removed, w/i 6 months I pulled the dots and just use the irons.
When we did the testing after mine failed, it was interesting to see how the draw to first bang & split times were effected by those who were so used to the dot always being there.
 
I’m 40, made the transition to dot almost five years ago. I don’t plan to go back. Sure, they can fail, but anything mechanical can fail. Do your due diligence. That’s also why it has backup irons.

I have reconnected with my old plt sgt shooting PRS. We went to the sand when the M68 was brand new, I never got issued one. He mentioned shooting dots wrong for years because so many then didn’t grasp target focus.
 
Maybe the toughest factor for a precision rifle shooter (who is used to looking/seeing through riflescopes) transitioning to RDS is avoiding the impulse to treat the RDS as a mini-scope. Trying, either consciously or semi-consciously, to treat it as you would a riflescope. To bring it up to vision plane, and then "look through" it.

What you really want to do, when learning RDS, is treat it as a frameless dot hanging out there in space. Don't use the aluminum frame as your vision locater. Don't "hunt for" the frame with a perfectly centered dot.

Instead, just do dry fire reps, focused entirely on the target, until you figure out the draw/press-out/presentation that gets you a floating dot right on top of the target. And then dry fire that draw & presentation about 1k times.
 
I ran a vortex that failed, at the worst time, luckily it was just a match. Once I had the cataracts removed, w/i 6 months I pulled the dots and just use the irons.
When we did the testing after mine failed, it was interesting to see how the draw to first bang & split times were effected by those who were so used to the dot always being there.
Aside from cataracts, how is your vision otherwise, pre- and post-surgery?

The problem I had, starting at 60 yrs old, was how slowly my focus changed between irons on pistol, and target. And probably, because I wanted more than a hazy indistinct target before breaking the shot. I could use eyeglasses with reader up top on dominant (R) eye, which I did while learning irons. But w/o that reader/cheater I can't really resolve the front sight clearly. So I lose time if I don't have the cheater lens on R eye up top, and I lose time trying to sort out the target from the hazy background mess.

The thing about training up on RDS, it will get the same results as a many hours practiced iron sights presentation, so that when/if you go back to irons, the presentation already is dialed. Whether you can see those irons is another question though!