I've owned several heavy barreled 700s over the years, from SPS and LTR .223s to fluted Sendero's in .300 Win Mag. I've also owned a couple of 700 5Rs in .308, and they have all shot reasonably well. The 5Rs have been consistently more accurate, although the standard 700s have shot sub MOA. In fact, I have a 20" tactical that is a solid 3/4" rifle, and has held its own against my 5Rs. But, as I mentioned, the 5Rs have always been consistently more accurate.
So, here's my question. Is it just the barrel that makes the 5R a more accurate rifle, or do you think more effort/time is put into machining the 5R action? Do you think the guys at Remington take more pride in the 5Rs, and therefore put a little more time into building them? For 'smiths who've built on both actions, have you found the 5R receiver to be more square? Or, is it just another stainless action with no distinguishing features other than the barrel? Now, I know the stock does make a difference, especially when comparing the HS with the Hogue or plastic fantastic found on the ADL Varmints. But, in comparing just the actions and barrels, is it the barrel making all the difference?
So, here's my question. Is it just the barrel that makes the 5R a more accurate rifle, or do you think more effort/time is put into machining the 5R action? Do you think the guys at Remington take more pride in the 5Rs, and therefore put a little more time into building them? For 'smiths who've built on both actions, have you found the 5R receiver to be more square? Or, is it just another stainless action with no distinguishing features other than the barrel? Now, I know the stock does make a difference, especially when comparing the HS with the Hogue or plastic fantastic found on the ADL Varmints. But, in comparing just the actions and barrels, is it the barrel making all the difference?