• 1 WEEK LEFT: This Target Haunts Me Contest

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

RRS Ascend ball head vs BH-30

Crews

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
  • May 11, 2017
    1,635
    899
    44
    Hallsville, Tx
    It looks like the ball head that comes on the new Ascend tripod can be used to hold a hunting rifle of reasonable weight, based on some of the pictures I’ve seen.

    With that as a reference, would it also be safe to consider the BH-30 ball head capable of doing the same thing? @MPHReallyRightStuff

    I am considering downsizing from TFCT-34 with Anvil 30 to something smaller and shorter. I glass and shoot from sitting exclusively, and want more portability.
     
    @Crews Depends on what you are shooting when you aren't glassing. Lately we have been recommending BH-25 and above for hunters using rifles as well. The Ascend Ballhead will hold but there are limits as it wasn't designed high leverage and people using in a free recoil setting. I personally like the Ascend tripod with platform center column with BH-40 SC or the Anvil. I lose the excess weight of the 2 or 3 series TFCT and I can have a 3 inch center column by removing the bottom portion for smaller adjustments.
     
    I am thinking TFC-14 (no center column), and BH-30 because it saves me a good amount over the BH-40. As long as I am not sorely disappointed on stability. I am only using 10# hunting rifles and certainly not doing any free recoil. In all honesty I only mount a rifle 20% of the time to begin with.
     
    Got in the TFC-14 and BH-30. I am 5’9” so at max height it is just tall enough for me to shoot standing at full extension. I couldn’t stand upright and glass with the 34 anyhow, so no big loss there. I did some dry firing while standing…. I don’t feel like I’ve given up a ton of stability over the TFCT-34 and Anvil 30. From seated and kneeling it’s about the same. The ballhead is definitely a bit nicer for observation, can set the tension for moving binoculars around without them flopping loose like the Anvil 30. The whole package is lighter, and 3”+ shorter so it’ll be easier to fit in the backpack. All in all, I am very happy with the decision to downsize.

    @RMOReallyRightStuff
    @MPHReallyRightStuff
    Thanks for the advise. A very happy customer with 1st and now 2nd RRS product.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: MPHReallyRightStuff
    E3CE2528-D845-4979-82B2-6C64E648ECB7.jpeg

    024F79B8-51DE-4808-9C91-1A8605023F2C.jpeg