Precision Rifle Gear RRS TVC-33 VS 22I
- Thread starter plinkin
- Start date
The 33 has thicker legs, if that’s what you’re asking, and is rated for more weight if that’s relevant. I don’t know that you’ll see a stability difference between them spotting and shooting.
The 22 has a fairly specific use case and for everything else the 33 or 34 makes more sense.
The 22 has a fairly specific use case and for everything else the 33 or 34 makes more sense.
Gotcha I'm trying to buy once cry once, I want the setup to be as solid as possible.
Technically the 22 will be stiffer than the 33 and the 33 over the 34. Less joints = more stiffness
I own a 34 for ease of travel/packability and tight field shooting positions.
Personal opinion, the thing the 22 does better than the 33/34 is deployment speed for glassing or to take a kneeling shot fast. Again, Less joints = less flex but the stiffness you give up on the 33/34 is not worth the loss of versatility.
I think the 34 is the most versatile followed by the 33 and the 22
Reverse that for Speed of deployment
I own a 34 for ease of travel/packability and tight field shooting positions.
Personal opinion, the thing the 22 does better than the 33/34 is deployment speed for glassing or to take a kneeling shot fast. Again, Less joints = less flex but the stiffness you give up on the 33/34 is not worth the loss of versatility.
I think the 34 is the most versatile followed by the 33 and the 22
Reverse that for Speed of deployment
Do you think the difference in stiffness is negligible or enough I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the 22 and the 33?
With perfect form you might see a difference on paper from the first position.
Through the lens of shooting a match or shooting in the desert with my buddies I don’t want to give up the versatility of the 34 for a tiny more amount of stiffness.
I wanna get a 22 in the near future but I see it more as dedicated support for speed than versatility. Halving my pick for a rocky / hilly match location I’ll always grab a 33/34.
That said I know some really good shooters running 22s off scabbards and slings.
There is no size fits all, gotta pick the tool that will fit best for your shooting but the stiffness of the RRS systems to me would be a secondary consideration
Last edited:
10 4 thanks, I'll be on the lookout for a TFCT 33 with anvil.
I have a 34 and bought a 22 both with anvils.
22 slightly steadier. Quicker to deploy make adjustments etc with only one lock and it’s up top.
34 is what you want for travel
I got the 22 for hunting. Quicker deploy , BIG reason was its inverted so dirt sand mud snow stay out of interior legs and locks
Lots of info here
www.snipershide.com
22 slightly steadier. Quicker to deploy make adjustments etc with only one lock and it’s up top.
34 is what you want for travel
I got the 22 for hunting. Quicker deploy , BIG reason was its inverted so dirt sand mud snow stay out of interior legs and locks
Lots of info here
RRS TVC-22i seated position
Can someone that has one of these measure the distance from tripod leg “foot to foot” when shooting from a seated position? I’m 6’ and looking to buy an RRS tripod and have settled on either the TVC-22i or the TFCT-34L. But, I’ve got a particular application where I’m constrained on the...
www.snipershide.com 
I love my 34 with Anvil. It is rock steady even with a 20+ pound AI on it
I have had the 22i and loved it. It was really solid. I traded it for one that collapses down to a small package though. If I were just shooting competitions only it would be my go to.
Another thing about it is you have to spread the legs way out of you are going to be shooting from the sitting position. At least I did.
Another thing about it is you have to spread the legs way out of you are going to be shooting from the sitting position. At least I did.
I was originally torn between the 22 and 33. In order for me to shoot sitting on the ground, the 22 would have to have two legs swung out in the middle position and the third leg out in the third position. The anvil has enough tilt range to let you do this on the 22, but the footprint is rather large. I ended up with the 33 for the greater versatility when setting up on inclines or when a smaller footprint is needed such when seated in a ground blind.
I would be interested in a custom length 22 with shorter legs. I don't need the maximum height of the current production specs. If you don't plan to glass with a 22i, there's no reason for the current leg length. Perhaps a shorter maximum leg length that will max out at your standing shooting height will help reduce the footprint some while seated.
I would be interested in a custom length 22 with shorter legs. I don't need the maximum height of the current production specs. If you don't plan to glass with a 22i, there's no reason for the current leg length. Perhaps a shorter maximum leg length that will max out at your standing shooting height will help reduce the footprint some while seated.
Look what was just announced
TVC-22i Compact
rrssoar.com
TVC-22i Compact
TVC-22i Compact Tripod
Experience the height of precision with Really Right Stuff SOAR. Explore our robust collection of sport optics equipment and advanced tools designed for outdoor enthusiasts seeking unrivaled quality and performance.
rrssoar.com 
