As the subject says, I'm looking for experienced opinions of guys who have spent time behind both reticles. I hate posting an "X vs. Y" thread but I'd really like some input from anyone who has spent time behind both the S&B and the Kahles as I've only spent time behind the S&B.
I've spent quite a bit of time behind a friend's S&B 5-25 with the H2CMR reticle; I like the glass, the DT turrets are pretty darn good even if the detents are a little close together, and I *really* like the H2CMR reticle for all the holdover & ranging options.
I've done a lot of reading on the Kahles 6-24 and it seems like a great scope. I like the parallax location (even if it lacks the 10m capability of the S&B), I have no doubts about glass quality, and it sounds like the turrets are very positive. One thing that stands out right away to me is that while I like the Mil4 reticle much better than say a P4F it doesn't offer as many fine ranging options as the H2CMR.
To anyone that has spent time behind both of these scopes and reticles and can offer their experience: Did you feel that the Mil4 in the Kahles was lacking in any way over the H2CMR? Any other compelling reasons to spend the extra $450 for the S&B?
I've spent quite a bit of time behind a friend's S&B 5-25 with the H2CMR reticle; I like the glass, the DT turrets are pretty darn good even if the detents are a little close together, and I *really* like the H2CMR reticle for all the holdover & ranging options.
I've done a lot of reading on the Kahles 6-24 and it seems like a great scope. I like the parallax location (even if it lacks the 10m capability of the S&B), I have no doubts about glass quality, and it sounds like the turrets are very positive. One thing that stands out right away to me is that while I like the Mil4 reticle much better than say a P4F it doesn't offer as many fine ranging options as the H2CMR.
To anyone that has spent time behind both of these scopes and reticles and can offer their experience: Did you feel that the Mil4 in the Kahles was lacking in any way over the H2CMR? Any other compelling reasons to spend the extra $450 for the S&B?