Sandbag or Sack?

SmallBoreSnipers

Gunny Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Aug 15, 2009
1,204
1
44
Troy, NY
I am looking to maybe get away from my rigid bipod and use something else up front. There are 2 ways I am looking at going, but some argue about which one is more accurate.

1) front bag: I've heard that just using a front and rear sandbag can be more accurate than even using a rifle rest (not looking into heavy rests or vices)
This one here would compliment my stoney point rear bag...
http://www.amazon.com/Stoney-Point-Standard-Front-Shooting/dp/B000G3D7R4/ref=pd_sim_sg_2

2) sack: Some say just resting on one sack or "H Shape" bag that you lay the rifle on is better than using two bags. Something like this...
http://www.exploreproducts.com/caldwell-tack-driver-shooting-rifle-rest-filled.htm

Which way do you guys think is better??
 
Re: Sandbag or Sack?

A swivel model Harris makes things a lot easier. You can adjust the tension any way you like from very loose and floppy to very tight. If you're only shooting benchrest, I'm surprised that you don't want a heavy, adjustable benchrest tripod. I just use an old Hoppes cast iron tripod with leather sandbags front and rear. Doesn't have to be fancy or expensive, just rock steady and stable.
 
Re: Sandbag or Sack?

I have two custom front bags I use. I sometimes only use one, but if I need to get the rifle higher I add the other one ontop of it. Works out great. I've also heard good things about "The Rock" type front rests, but I've never used one to see.