Re: Scope ring lapping???
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hellbender</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Doug S...
If your base would have been properly bedded, you probably would not have seen the result you are experiencing.<span style="color: #33CC00">The base is perfectly flush with the action.</span>
If you remove your rings and hold a straight edge on your base and hold it up to the light, I believe you will see your base is warped. <span style="color: #33CC00">Sorry, no warpage.</span>
Looks like it is low in the center and slightly twisted (guessing by the wear pattern on the rings).
Also, what torque value did you apply to the top ring screws while you are lapping? <span style="color: #33CC00">While lapping, it is impossible to apply the same measured torque to the ring caps, however, the rings are rigid ennough as not to flex under the slight ring pressure. This ensures even pressure against the lapping bar and gives a TRUE ROUND end result.</span>
Of course, it would be impossible to get a reliable, even torque value with lapping compound between the ring halves.
Think that through a little.
I don't mean to be argumentative, but without a perfectly flat and unwarped base, you will just ruin a good set of rings by lapping. On many guns (esp. Remmy's) that will require base bedding.<span style="color: #33CC00">I have Surgeon actions with the rail milled as part of the receiver. These still required lapping and showed similar wear patterns on the rings albeit not as much. The end result is this, these rings are now lapped for this action connected to this base connected to this scope. All other factors are mute at this point.</span>With cheap rings, all bets are off and it may (or may not) be useful. </div></div>