Send-iT by Long Range Arms ("LRA")

[MCHOG]

I don't usually post reviews of products, but this thing is absolutely amazing. I mounted it vertically on my Spuhr, forward of the parallax knob on my Vortex HD Razor. When I look through my scope with both eyes open, the lights become superimposed in the view of my scope (without distracting from the reticle or the target). In all my research before buying it, I didn't see anyone mention that. Being able to see the lights “inside” the scope is huge, and really sets this apart from the bubble levels. Not having to shift attention outside of the scope will save time on PRS stages.

Also, I confirmed with numerous other devices that the factory-set level point had my AXMC perfectly level. I also like the fact that, when mounted vertically, it did not stick out any further than my parallax knob.

I had high expectations, and this product far exceeded them.

Here is a link: https://long-range-arms.myshopify.com/collections/send-it-products/products/send-it-xsl

PS: I know how Frank feels about leveling devices. But there have been several times when things felt and looked "right," but the built-in level on my Spuhr said otherwise, and vice versa. I guess my senses are not as tuned in as they should be.

 

[SonicBurlap]

You might know the answer to this one, I looked at the instructions on their web site and saw several areas where it mentioned that it can be returned to factory settings after you have set your own zero, but I could not find anywhere how that would be achieved.

 

[MCHOG]

I have just used the factory settings and have not re-zeroed. I scanned the manual that came with it and put a link to it below. I don't see anything in there about resetting to factory, but you can look also. I e-mailed the company a while ago about something else and they were very responsive.

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

 

[SonicBurlap]

I have just used the factory settings and have not re-zeroed. I scanned the manual that came with it and put a link to it below. I don't see anything in there about resetting to factory, but you can look also. I e-mailed the company a while ago about something else and they were very responsive.

Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

I might do that, thanks.

 

[forrestgump01]

There comes a point when all the gadgetry becomes a little too much.
Kinda like the guy with 45 pounds of electronics hanging of his AR. Let me see ......... $25 for a bubble that's guaranteed to work (unless you smash it) or $200 for something else im gonna need a battery for and with my luck would probably take a shit out in the field when I need it the most. . just my opinion.

 

[SonicBurlap]

Personal choice, $25 for bubble levels that are so inaccurate my inner ear does a way better job, and although they are still on some of my rifles, primarily so because I haven't taken the time to remove them yet. Most shooters here spend thousands on actions and chassis, or stocks, what gets me is the outrage over the pricing of $50-$400 accessories from rings to bipods by guys who spend at least upwards of $2,500 for a new base rifle. Then again this is nothing new, Custer rode off to face a vastly greater number of opponents equipped with repeaters with his troops sporting trapdoors and leaving Gatling guns behind because they were too newfangled, expensive, heavy and cumbersome and would just lead to more wasted ammo. Matter of fact most of us are on this forum because we don't want to learn about new equipment, methods, and compare notes and experience - NOT! I admire those who get out their muzzle loaders and hunt like good ol' Davy Crockett but then again I don't build my own hot rods and I enjoy giving some new technology a try if I think it might be of value, doesn't mean you have to do it. I'm not going to tell you how to spend your green; opinion taken for what it's worth.

 

[forrestgump01]

Jusy so we are clear, I was simply giving my opinion. Im not saying someone should or should not buy a device like this . buy whatever you want.
You are correct there are lots of guys on this sight because they want to learn new methods , experience , equipment.
And there are just as many that are trying to use equipment and gadgets to overcome their piss poor shooting skills.

 

[SonicBurlap]

I'm glad you got that out of your system even though that was not what I asked about. As for overcoming piss poor shooting skills, no amount of equipment, new, or old can help there; the only thing that works is to get your butt out to the range and practice. I remember when the Harris bipod was the greatest thing since sliced bread, now most of us agree that compared to today's equipment they are pretty crappy/. Time moves on and so do we.

 

[JOS]

There comes a point when all the gadgetry becomes a little too much.
Kinda like the guy with 45 pounds of electronics hanging of his AR. Let me see ......... $25 for a bubble that's guaranteed to work (unless you smash it) or $200 for something else im gonna need a battery for and with my luck would probably take a shit out in the field when I need it the most. . just my opinion.

All the weapons I have with levels are target weapons. Nothing else has levels. My eye is just fine for them. Extra batteries are very light and small. Some of us are very happy to hit the target. Others seek one hole groups. Both are having fun.

 

[bwall57]

Personal choice, $25 for bubble levels that are so inaccurate my inner ear does a way better job, and although they are still on some of my rifles, primarily so because I haven't taken the time to remove them yet. Most shooters here spend thousands on actions and chassis, or stocks, what gets me is the outrage over the pricing of $50-$400 accessories from rings to bipods by guys who spend at least upwards of $2,500 for a new base rifle. Then again this is nothing new, Custer rode off to face a vastly greater number of opponents equipped with repeaters with his troops sporting trapdoors and leaving Gatling guns behind because they were too newfangled, expensive, heavy and cumbersome and would just lead to more wasted ammo. Matter of fact most of us are on this forum because we don't want to learn about new equipment, methods, and compare notes and experience - NOT! I admire those who get out their muzzle loaders and hunt like good ol' Davy Crockett but then again I don't build my own hot rods and I enjoy giving some new technology a try if I think it might be of value, doesn't mean you have to do it. I'm not going to tell you how to spend your green; opinion taken for what it's worth.

Good reply, nicely done. Exactly why I try to buy the best performance hardware. Buying factory grade hardware and spending money on upgrades that fail to improve accuracy is frustrating. Good hardware helps to improves your shooting skills and better yet its the more fun to use.