Re: Sheriffs = No First Aid?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Zebra308</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well If I may try to expalin something, Its not about us ( LEO ) being lazy or stupid, or not wanting to help. I agree that as First Responders we should be better trained in First Aid besides the basic. Two Dept's here in my tri-county area require that the applicant be both Fire and Police Cert.Now Vicarious Liabiilty and Preponderance of Evidence in a Civil Law Suite. Everything in our job like many others deals with certificates and cred's. Everything from being certifed to drive a Police car to carrying OC or a baton. If you dont have the certificate or cred's to carry or perform a task,and you do it guess what you just broke policy / proceedure and or the law.So how can you break what you are paid to enforce is how some may look at that. Now lets say that in a simular situation an officer who assits a person in medical need and performs a task such as the eppy - pen and the person either passes away, even from another serious medical condition or even though you just saved thier life, they still want to sue you becasue you being the police officer just performed a medical treatment without being trained, certifed or having the cred's or mis diagnosed becasue of the lack of training, certifiaction or cred's. Now it goes to a Civil Law Suite where some hot shot young attorney sues you and or the P.D. on behalf of the family, and guess what, since you broke policy / procedure guess who dont have your back. That's where the Good Sam Clause is supposed to keep that from happening? Again I am not trying to make excuses, just a for instance of how we are at times caught in situations that no matter what we do with good and honorable intent, LEO's are still screwed. </div></div>
Agree completely....and JB Gleason....yup you have a valid argument also....
Unfortunately everything today is about liability....and the way I understand it you WILL end up with a worse outcome if you use medical practices that you are not trained for. Im a Cop and unfortunately you DO need to think about your PERSONAL liability, because thats EXACTLY what it is.
I had a life save the other day. The gal had swallowed and choked on a couple Fentanyl patches (besides the couple she had on her chest.....When I got there she was not breathing and had no pulse. I attempted to clear her airway and was unable to do so but I could just see a portion of the patch. I began CPR on her and was able, to my suprise, to get a pulse after a few seconds of compressions. Unfortunately she was still not breathing on her own or even attempting to breath. I was unable at first to get air into her with a BVM so I had to attempt to jam an oropharyngeal as far back as possible to try to get air past that damn Fentanyl patch. What did she really need? Prob a tracheotomy....was I trained in it....NOPE. There is no damn way I would attempt to do that, even though I was sure I wasnt going to be able to keep her alive much longer.
Its easy for people to say "I would do this" or "I would do that" till you are faced with the liability of it all....and yes it is YOUR liability. In Minnesota I actually have to pay a yearly fee to have legal representation on standby in case someone decides that they want to sue me. If you are not breaking "Policy" with what you have done then MAYBE your department will have your back, but that isnt a gaurentee.
It all comes down to how much are you willing to risk YOUR families way of life for someone else. Its a shitty way to look at it yes, but thats the way today's Lawyers have made things. They have made things so frikin petty you have to be careful on how you word things...say you get someone on a DWI/DUI. I would get torn up in court if I even said I could smell "alcohol" on him, Alcohol does not technically have a smell, its the process of making it drinkable that you can smell, I have to say "the odor of an alcoholic beverage". There are alot of instances like that but you get the point.
As far as the Medical training goes....here in Minnesota it is required to be a cop. Which is great....but it is NOT free.
My training is a step above basic and still cost me $500 PLUS 4 days off from work that I didnt get paid for. EMT-B as far as I know costs about $2,000 and takes a couple days a week for an entire summer, plus Exam fees....now after that you have to continue to get refresher training, which hopefully your department will pay for, but doesnt have to.
Now for the medical equipment. Some departments provide it and some try to get it donated but not all of them have GOOD gear, besides, even if they did have some super life saving gear the basic training that YOU can afford isnt going to cover it.
Did you know that I can even be sued if I use medical gear that I have purchased myself to use? Yup, department aquired, department issued and all Im allowed to use....do I have my own personal bag with my own hand picked stuff, yup, and you know what? Its only for me and my fellow officers/fire/ems persons.....
There is a REASON doctors have Liability/malpractice insurance....
People and Lawyers have made things very difficult to "help" them in a time of need.
Have you ever thought about why Cops have to have in squad video, in squad audio recording, personal audio recording device that links to the video, and then still have a personal recorder.....it does help with convictions yes....but it also prevents liability and lawsuits...
And before I hear the argument that Cops can afford to pay for this stuff, try looking up online and see what Cops REALLY make.....The first job offer I got was for $12 an hour, smaller departments pay up to about $15-16 per hour, big departments may offer up to about $18-19, County is a bit better but you are going to be hard pressed to do better than $20-23 hr with exp.