Re: Soldier awarded and punished in same battle?
Yeah, I don't know any more than this article alludes to, but I'm of the opinion that he's probably a fall guy for some higher-up that doesn't have the balls to take responsibility. If the Cpt. was at fault for something then he was at fault; if he was a hero then he's a hero. I just cant wrap my mind around the fact that they'd put him in for the third highest commendation if he was in fact in the wrong in one way or another. Sounds fishy enough to make me want to believe that he's being made a patsy.
I'd like to know more, like, what preparations exactly were not made? Why were they not made? Exactly who's decision was it? In almost every job I've ever had, at some point or another, I've been handed a shit sandwich and been told to produce results. It happens all the time in the oil field when some engineer makes us do the stupidest shit. After we try to talk them out of the stupid, we argue, plead, and finally do what we're told, we are the ones who have to answer the question, "why did the well go to shit?"