• Range Day Contest - Only a Few Hours Left To Enter!

    Tell us about your last day at the range, but there’s a catch: Describe it in just 5 words. Winner gets new limited edition Hide merch. Remember, subscribers have a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Sturm Ruger has bought Anderson Manufacturing

They're a good machine shop with bad firearms standards. Ruger got a new machine shop, that's it. Really nothing to see here other than Ruger keeping up on production more effectively.

Adios to the worst AR manufacturer there was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lash
Something was for sale, someone bought it.

In the grand scheme of things, I guess I’m glad Ruger bought it and is intent to continue operations using the existing workforce.

I’ve read a few posts online speculating as to why Anderson was in a position to sell, but in the end, it doesn’t matter much - American workers who have been building America’s Rifle for many years are going to keep doing so, and doing so under what is apparently a more stable corporation.
 
One shitty gun company bought another shitty brand.

Like what is the point. Poverty pony has zero value as a brand. Better off selling Ruger branded lowers not that they would since Ruger is gay ass fudd shit.
Make me a list of acceptable brands we should all own
 
Like what is the point. Poverty pony has zero value as a brand. Better off selling Ruger branded lowers

Ruger’s announcements directly stated that they bought the manufacturing assets, are discontinuing the Anderson brand, and will be using the facilities and existing workforce to expand their own brand production.
 
I've had zero issues with many anderson products and you could call them and they'd pick up. Bought their version of an m16a4 a few months ago and it's been flawless. Kinda disappointed they're
 
Wonder if they will keep the roll mark or pull it all under Ruger? Anderson doesn't have a good, or even decent, reputation. Would make sense to discard the name entirely.
1751481009428.png

1751481097573.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: vanrichten
One shitty gun company bought another shitty brand.

Like what is the point. Poverty pony has zero value as a brand. Better off selling Ruger branded lowers not that they would since Ruger is gay ass fudd shit.

Not saying that you are completely wrong, but there are people with a limited budget. While they should be spending their money on a BCM, Daniel Defense, etc there can be exceptions. I started with a DPMS and a Bushmaster. The DPMS gave me fits but the Bushmaster was reliable.

Today I depend on BCM at a minimum and KAC at the upper end, and own some PSA stuff that has been fun and reliable. The lower tiered stuff enticed me into the AR world and that will attract the Ruger/Anderson crowd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roostercogburn98
BCM makes a good product for the money.
I’ve ran BCM and PSA with no issues and issues, but everything has the potential for a problem.

Anderson lowers are/were just a vehicle for components and made fine blasters and plinkers.

I just get tired of hearing the constant “trash, trash trash” talk from some people. I don’t lose any sleep over it by any means.
 
I’ve ran BCM and PSA with no issues and issues, but everything has the potential for a problem.

Anderson lowers are/were just a vehicle for components and made fine blasters and plinkers.

I just get tired of hearing the constant “trash, trash trash” talk from some people. I don’t lose any sleep over it by any means.
The Anderson lowers seemed to be a great value for the money. The rest of their stuff, including the LPKs were always suspect. I have seen issues with them.

It really comes down to the intended use. A weekender who occasionally does a couple mag dumps, the training junkie who puts 500 rounds through an AR per day in a class, or the precision shooter trying to win a match all have different goals.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lightning8 and lash