Super Glue and .22..?

Josh Smith

Mosin Fan
Full Member
Minuteman
Oct 27, 2009
189
7
Wabash IN
smith-sights.com
I got this idea as I was playing with chamber pressure numbers the other day for the .45acp - a cartridge I reload.

With increased chamber pressures, if there is sufficient powder, there is usually increased efficiency of the cartridge.

That led me to thinking, what would happen if I were to add a dab of superglue to the area where the bullet enters the cartridge of a .22 Long Rifle?

Probably risking a head blowout so I've not tried it.

I don't recommend you try it either.

Probably just a matter of time before I <span style="font-style: italic">do</span> try it. Probably right after I get a chronograph.

Just curious as to what ya'll might have to say about this practice. Has anyone ever done it? If not, have you heard of anything similar being done?

Josh
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

Yeah, I agree.

I really like my Mk II BTVS though, and it's perfectly possible I won't try this at all.

Mostly I'm just curious as to whether any Darwin Award Winners <span style="font-style: italic">have</span> tried it!

Josh
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

It was dumb ass on RFC and it's dumb ass here.
Factory loads are already at their maximum safe average working pressure.
If you want more velocity than Stingers or Velocitors, just buy a .22 Mag.
It's better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt- Benjamin Franklin.
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

for what gain?
50fps? 100?
Pointless and stupid.

Accuracy (which is EVERYTHING in .22rf's) is most often found at lower velocity.


read more, post less
wink.gif
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

That's like trying to raise the compression ratio of your engine by adding epoxy to the oil.
Stop, or start thinking, before you hurt yourself.
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

I don't think pressures will change at all, with just a dab. I you really put some glue on there you may see some pressure spike. The bullets are already heavily crimped into the case and the adhesion between brass and lead with superglue would not really be enough to make a difference over the pressure it takes to break the crimp. IMO

Still it's a stupid idea, maybe you should get some pliers and crimp them harder, the principal is the same.
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

The nail polish waterproofing thing got me thinking again.

You see, I was thinking about the .45acp cartridge, as I mentioned. Then I got to thinking about the .45 G.A.P. and how it achieves basically the same thing as the A.C.P. in about the same strength package by utilizing higher chamber pressures - 100 years of powder and metallurgy advancements made this possible.

Then I got to thinking about the .22LR and the .22 Magnum. The .22 Magnum developed from an older cartridge (.22 Winchester Rimfire, I think?) designed to keep pressures down, but to also give more speed.

So then I got to thinking, with the metallurgy and powder advances, why can't we just raise the pressures of the .22LR a bit and get around 2000fps with a true jacketed bullet? Winchester was doing this at one time, only the lack of a jacket lead to bad leading problems, and CCI is doing almost the same thing with the Velocitor right now.

The only weakness would be the balloon head. It might blow even with proper support.

I think an all-steel bolt gun like a Savage or CZ should be able to contain the pressures, though. Full case support and all that.

Wouldn't try it in an aluminum receiver.

It's all academic right now. But I think you see where I'm going here... Though the Epperson Cricket may be the better round with which to experiment. Easier to load.

Josh
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

I highly advise against cyanoacrylates "super glue" as well. I sold it for many years and when that stuff cures it is very brittle and sharp possibly damaging your gun. On top of it the outer layer that does not bond to the jacket will possibly adhere to the chamber wall. If it adheres to the wall it will be tough getting the cartridge out. Probably a trip to the gunsmith. I have seen shear loads above 2500 psi on metal to metal. Third any uncured glue will put vapors in your chamber and attach to everything.
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

even without considering any "pressure" damage, stiletto15 made the best points.

even if it doesn't blow up, your going to have problems like he explained, including the uncured glue that remains liquid by being protected by the glue that formed a skin on top.
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Josh Smith</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The nail polish waterproofing thing got me thinking again.

You see, I was thinking about the .45acp cartridge, as I mentioned. Then I got to thinking about the .45 G.A.P. and how it achieves basically the same thing as the A.C.P. in about the same strength package by utilizing higher chamber pressures - 100 years of powder and metallurgy advancements made this possible.

Then I got to thinking about the .22LR and the .22 Magnum. The .22 Magnum developed from an older cartridge (.22 Winchester Rimfire, I think?) designed to keep pressures down, but to also give more speed.

So then I got to thinking, with the metallurgy and powder advances, why can't we just raise the pressures of the .22LR a bit and get around 2000fps with a true jacketed bullet? Winchester was doing this at one time, only the lack of a jacket lead to bad leading problems, and CCI is doing almost the same thing with the Velocitor right now.

The only weakness would be the balloon head. It might blow even with proper support.

I think an all-steel bolt gun like a Savage or CZ should be able to contain the pressures, though. Full case support and all that.

Wouldn't try it in an aluminum receiver.

It's all academic right now. But I think you see where I'm going here... Though the Epperson Cricket may be the better round with which to experiment. Easier to load.

Josh </div></div>

Yes, with the technology advances that we have now there are a lot of really cool things that we "could" do with the 22 cartridge, however it'll never happen. The only thing that will happen is a new catridge very similar to the .22lr will come out, and it'll do those cool thing you would like to see, however it won't chamber in a .22lr rifle. The reason for this is that the .22lr has been around for a REALLY LOOOOONNNNGGG time. And with being around a while, there comes a lot of rifles chambered for that round. Some of those rifles are 50+ years old that are still getting shot to this day. Any ammunition made today that bears the .22lr name, has to be safe in the oldest of firearms that are safe for use.

A great example of this is the .45-70govt. Any factory ammunition (with few exceptions) have to produce ammunition which will be safe to use in the old 'trap door' rifles The .45-70 can be loaded HAWT, and can be a heck of a powerhouse rifle that can take down just about anything on the planet, and the rifles chambered for it are far cheaper than those of the likes of .458mag, lott, ect.. The exception that I mentioned refers to some specialty ammo manufacturers that are producing hot loads with very pronounced warnings to be used only in certain makes of rifles. The easy way around the 'trap door' rifle issue was a new cartridge that did all the cool things that you can do with a .45-70, but won't chamber in a .45-70, and that became the .450Marlin. If the manufactures thought there was a market for what you want, they would make it, but it would have to be something that wouldn't chamber in a .22lr rifle of any make or model.

Branden
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

^+1

Similarly in the paperwork that comes with a CMP Garand there is a warning not to shoot modern .30-06 hunting ammo due to it being loaded hotter than the original U.S. .30 cal.
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dust_Remover</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Josh Smith</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The nail polish waterproofing thing got me thinking again.

You see, I was thinking about the .45acp cartridge, as I mentioned. Then I got to thinking about the .45 G.A.P. and how it achieves basically the same thing as the A.C.P. in about the same strength package by utilizing higher chamber pressures - 100 years of powder and metallurgy advancements made this possible.

Then I got to thinking about the .22LR and the .22 Magnum. The .22 Magnum developed from an older cartridge (.22 Winchester Rimfire, I think?) designed to keep pressures down, but to also give more speed.

So then I got to thinking, with the metallurgy and powder advances, why can't we just raise the pressures of the .22LR a bit and get around 2000fps with a true jacketed bullet? Winchester was doing this at one time, only the lack of a jacket lead to bad leading problems, and CCI is doing almost the same thing with the Velocitor right now.

The only weakness would be the balloon head. It might blow even with proper support.

I think an all-steel bolt gun like a Savage or CZ should be able to contain the pressures, though. Full case support and all that.

Wouldn't try it in an aluminum receiver.

It's all academic right now. But I think you see where I'm going here... Though the Epperson Cricket may be the better round with which to experiment. Easier to load.

Josh </div></div>

Yes, with the technology advances that we have now there are a lot of really cool things that we "could" do with the 22 cartridge, however it'll never happen. The only thing that will happen is a new catridge very similar to the .22lr will come out, and it'll do those cool thing you would like to see, however it won't chamber in a .22lr rifle. The reason for this is that the .22lr has been around for a REALLY LOOOOONNNNGGG time. And with being around a while, there comes a lot of rifles chambered for that round. Some of those rifles are 50+ years old that are still getting shot to this day. Any ammunition made today that bears the .22lr name, has to be safe in the oldest of firearms that are safe for use.

A great example of this is the .45-70govt. Any factory ammunition (with few exceptions) have to produce ammunition which will be safe to use in the old 'trap door' rifles The .45-70 can be loaded HAWT, and can be a heck of a powerhouse rifle that can take down just about anything on the planet, and the rifles chambered for it are far cheaper than those of the likes of .458mag, lott, ect.. The exception that I mentioned refers to some specialty ammo manufacturers that are producing hot loads with very pronounced warnings to be used only in certain makes of rifles. The easy way around the 'trap door' rifle issue was a new cartridge that did all the cool things that you can do with a .45-70, but won't chamber in a .45-70, and that became the .450Marlin. If the manufactures thought there was a market for what you want, they would make it, but it would have to be something that wouldn't chamber in a .22lr rifle of any make or model.

Branden </div></div>

Brandon,

This is the BEST dissertation on the subject I've yet to read. Thank you!

Josh
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

For what gain? How much do you think you will get?
and
Why?
Accuracy is not to be found up there. Little point in having more power without the accuracy is there?

At times it has been possible for some people to get primed .22rf cases. I have not seen anything to suggest those that had them were able to gain anything. Many of these guys know FAR more than you or I.


"But I think you see where I'm going here... "

I think you are the only one who does NOT see where you are going
wink.gif
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

You got it wrong on the pressure/velocity thing. Given the "same" powder in your test load (as in not changing the powder), then for every increase in velocity (energy), you actually "square" the pressure. Yes, a generalization, but also a good rule of thumb.

Thus, when a handloader sees an extra 50 fps out of his rifle load, using only more of the same powder type , you could also interpret another 2500 psi to get there.

Don't "tickle the dragon's belly" unless you REALLY know what you're doing.
 
Re: Super Glue and .22..?

Super-glue It would do nothing for your bullet, I would bet my next paycheck on that.

UNless it leaked through to the powder - then it would render it useless.

Being from r/c flying community let me tell you about super-glue.

It cannot withstand shock - if ever you want to break something from from superglue then give it a fast hard shock.


It's good for porous surfaces such as balsa wood, fingers, but not metal.